Cited by 102Image and Video Quality AssessmentDigital Media Forensic DetectionImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

C-DIIVINE: No-reference image quality assessment based on local magnitude and phase statistics of natural scenes

Zhang, Yi, Moorthy, Anush K., Chandler, Damon M., Bovik, Alan C.·2014·Signal Processing: Image Communication

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.image.2014.05.004

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Moorthy, A. K., Chandler, D. M., & Bovik, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Oklahoma State University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Yi
Venue
Signal Processing: Image Communication
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
725-747
ISSN
0923-5965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131676517
Cited by
102
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Signal Processing Image Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
no-reference image quality assessment, wavelet coefficient statistics, wrapped Cauchy distribution, structural similarity index, image distortion detection, natural image statistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review