Reduced-Reference Image Quality Assessment Using Divisive Normalization-Based Image Representation
Abstract
Reduced-reference image quality assessment (RRIQA) methods estimate image quality degradations with partial information about the ldquoperfect-qualityrdquo reference image. In this paper, we propose an RRIQA algorithm based on a divisive normalization image representation. Divisive normalization has been recognized as a successful approach to model the perceptual sensitivity of biological vision. It also provides a useful image representation that significantly improves statistical independence for natural images. By using a Gaussian scale mixture statistical model of image wavelet coefficients, we compute a divisive normalization transformation (DNT) for images and evaluate the quality of a distorted image by comparing a set of reduced-reference statistical features extracted from DNT-domain representations of the reference and distorted images, respectively. This leads to a generic or general-purpose RRIQA method, in which no assumption is made about the types of distortions occurring in the image being evaluated. The proposed algorithm is cross-validated using two publicly-accessible subject-rated image databases (the UT-Austin LIVE database and the Cornell-VCL A57 database) and demonstrates good performance across a wide range of image distortions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The DNT-extended KL divergence algorithm depends on a number of parameters that need to be trained on databases.
“However, this algorithm depends on a number of parameters that need to be trained on databases.”
From RRED Indices: Reduced Reference Entropic Differencing for Image Quality Assessment (2012) · cites this paper as [13]
Cites
Elements of Information Theory
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471200611 · Cited by 37,139 · see citing works
Image information and visual quality
Sheikh, H. R., & Bovik, A. C. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2005.859378 · Cited by 4,104 · see citing works
Natural Image Statistics and Neural Representation
Simoncelli, E. P., & Olshausen, B. A. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1193 · Cited by 2,460 · see citing works
Image denoising using scale mixtures of gaussians in the wavelet domain
Portilla, J., Strela, V., Wainwright, M. J., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.818640 · Cited by 2,256 · see citing works
Multifrequency channel decompositions of images and wavelet models
Mallat, S. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/29.45554 · Cited by 1,957 · see citing works
Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex
Heeger, D. J. (1992) · Visual Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/s0952523800009640 · Cited by 1,835 · see citing works
Shiftable multiscale transforms
Simoncelli, E. P., Freeman, W. T., Adelson, E. H., & Heeger, D. J. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.119725 · Cited by 1,331 · see citing works
VSNR: A Wavelet-Based Visual Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Natural Images
Chandler, D. M., & Hemami, S. S. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.901820 · Cited by 1,147 · see citing works
Modern Image Quality Assessment
Wang, Z., & Bovik, A. C. (2006) · Synthesis Lectures on Image, Video, and Multimedia Processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-02238-8 · Cited by 967 · see citing works
Self-citationThe statistics of natural images
Ruderman, D. (1994) · Network Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.1088/0954-898x_5_4_006 · Cited by 945 · see citing works
A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT
Simoncelli, E. P., & Heeger, D. J. (1998) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00183-1 · Cited by 941 · see citing works
No-reference perceptual quality assessment of JPEG compressed images
Wang, Z., Sheikh, H. R., & Bovik, A. C. (2003) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.2002.1038064 · Cited by 839 · see citing works
Self-citationNatural signal statistics and sensory gain control
Schwartz, O., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/90526 · Cited by 835 · see citing works
Noise removal via Bayesian wavelet coring
Simoncelli, E. P., & Adelson, E. H. (2002) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.1996.559512 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
No-reference quality assessment using natural scene statistics: JPEG2000
Sheikh, H. R., Bovik, A. C., & Cormack, L. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2005.854492 · Cited by 575 · see citing works
Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model
Foley, J. M. (1994) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.11.001710 · Cited by 573 · see citing works
Modern Image Quality Assessment
Wang, Z., & Bovik, A. C. (2006) · Synthesis lectures on image, video, and multimedia processing · doi:10.2200/s00010ed1v01y200508ivm003 · Cited by 500 · see citing works
Self-citationPerceptual blur and ringing metrics: application to JPEG2000
Marziliano, P., Frederic Dufaux, A., WINKLER, S. S., & Ebrahimi, T. (2003) · Signal Processing Image Communication · doi:10.1016/j.image.2003.08.003 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Model of visual contrast gain control and pattern masking
Watson, A. B., & Solomon, J. A. (1997) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.14.002379 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Scale Mixtures of Gaussians and the Statistics of Natural Images
Wainwright, M. J., & Simoncelli, E. P. (1999) · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Blind measurement of blocking artifacts in images
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., & Evan, B. L. (2002) · Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101) · doi:10.1109/icip.2000.899622 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Self-citationA generalized block-edge impairment metric for video coding
Wu, H. R., & Yuen, M. (1997) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/97.641398 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Wang, Z., Wu, G., Sheikh, H. R., Simoncelli, E. P., Yang, E.-H., & Bovik, A. C. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2005.864165 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Self-citationVisual adaptation as optimal information transmission
Wainwright, M. J. (1999) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00101-7 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Video Quality Experts Group: current results and future directions
Rohaly, A. M., Corriveau, P. J., Libert, J. M., Webster, A. A., Baroncini, V., Beerends, J. G., Blin, J.-L., Contin, L., Hamada, T., Harrison, D., et al. (2000) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.386632 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Spatial-temporal distortion metric for in-service quality monitoring of any digital video system
Wolf, S., & Pinson, M. (1999) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.371210 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Local Phase Coherence And The Perception of Blur
Wang, Z., Simoncelli, E. P., & Hughes, H. (2003) · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Self-citationAn image quality assessment method based on perception of structural information
Carnec, M., Callet, P. L., & Barba, D. (2004) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.2003.1247212 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Vision-model-based impairment metric to evaluate blocking artifacts in digital video
Yu, Z., Wu, H. R., WINKLER, S. S., & Chen, T. (2002) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.982412 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Nonlinear image representation for efficient perceptual coding
Malo, J., Epifanio, I., Navarro, R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2005.860325 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
A reduced-reference perceptual quality metric for in-service image quality assessment
Kusuma, T. M., & Zepernick, H. (2004) · doi:10.1109/tic.2003.1249092 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Low Bandwidth Reduced Reference Video Quality Monitoring System
Pinson, M. (2005) · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Blind quality assessment for JPEG2000 compressed images
Sheikh, H. R., Wang, Z., Cormack, L. K., & Bovik, A. C. (2003) · Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ACSSC) · doi:10.1109/acssc.2002.1197072 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationVisual features for image quality assessment with reduced reference
Carnec, M., Callet, P. L., & Barba, D. (2005) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.2005.1529777 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Image restoration using Gaussian scale mixtures in the wavelet domain
Portilla, J., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.2003.1246844 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Statistically and perceptually motivated nonlinear image representation
Lyu, S., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2007) · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · doi:10.1117/12.720848 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain
Mittal, A., Moorthy, A. K., & Bovik, A. C. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2012.2214050 · Cited by 6,064 · see citing works
Blind Image Quality Assessment: From Natural Scene Statistics to Perceptual Quality
Moorthy, A. K., & Bovik, A. C. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2011.2147325 · Cited by 1,763 · see citing works
Information content weighting for perceptual image quality assessment
Wang, Z., & Li, Q. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2010.2092435 · Cited by 1,304 · see citing works
Self-citationBlind Prediction of Natural Video Quality
Saad, M. A., Bovik, A. C., & Charrier, C. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2014.2299154 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
RRED Indices: Reduced Reference Entropic Differencing for Image Quality Assessment
Soundararajan, R., & Bovik, A. C. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2011.2166082 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Reduced- and No-Reference Image Quality Assessment
Wang, Z., & Bovik, A. (2011) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2011.942471 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Self-citationSpEED-QA: Spatial Efficient Entropic Differencing for Image and Video Quality
Bampis, C. G., Gupta, P., Soundararajan, R., & Bovik, A. C. (2017) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2017.2726542 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Moorthy, A. K., Chandler, D. M., & Bovik, A. C. (2014) · Signal Processing: Image Communication · doi:10.1016/j.image.2014.05.004 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Assessing Image Quality Issues for Real-World Problems
Chiu, T.-Y., Zhao, Y., & Gurari, D. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00370 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
- Authors
- Li, Q., & Wang, Z.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 202-211
- ISSN
- 1932-4553 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142731874
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 20.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Keywords
- reduced-reference image quality assessment, divisive normalization, Gaussian scale mixture model, wavelet coefficients, statistical features, image distortion, perceptual image quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review