Cited by 323Image and Video Quality AssessmentImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesDigital Media Forensic Detection

Reduced-Reference Image Quality Assessment Using Divisive Normalization-Based Image Representation

Li, Qiang, Wang, Zhou·2009·IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing

Abstract

Reduced-reference image quality assessment (RRIQA) methods estimate image quality degradations with partial information about the ldquoperfect-qualityrdquo reference image. In this paper, we propose an RRIQA algorithm based on a divisive normalization image representation. Divisive normalization has been recognized as a successful approach to model the perceptual sensitivity of biological vision. It also provides a useful image representation that significantly improves statistical independence for natural images. By using a Gaussian scale mixture statistical model of image wavelet coefficients, we compute a divisive normalization transformation (DNT) for images and evaluate the quality of a distorted image by comparing a set of reduced-reference statistical features extracted from DNT-domain representations of the reference and distorted images, respectively. This leads to a generic or general-purpose RRIQA method, in which no assumption is made about the types of distortions occurring in the image being evaluated. The proposed algorithm is cross-validated using two publicly-accessible subject-rated image databases (the UT-Austin LIVE database and the Cornell-VCL A57 database) and demonstrates good performance across a wide range of image distortions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jstsp.2009.2014497

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Q., & Wang, Z.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing
Published
2009-04
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
202-211
ISSN
1932-4553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142731874
Cited by
323
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 27
FWCI
20.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
reduced-reference image quality assessment, divisive normalization, Gaussian scale mixture model, wavelet coefficients, statistical features, image distortion, perceptual image quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review