The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
IgM in microbial infections: Taken for granted?
Open accessAbstract
Much has been learned about the structure, function, and production of IgM, since the antibody's initial characterization. It is widely accepted that IgM provides a first line of defense during microbial infections, prior to the generation of adaptive, high affinity IgG responses that are important for long-lived immunity and immunological memory. Although IgM responses are commonly used as a measure of exposure to infectious diseases, it is perhaps surprising that the role of and requirement for IgM in many microbial infections has not been well explored in vivo. This is in part due to the lack of capabilities, until relatively recently, to evaluate the requirement for IgM in the absence of coincident IgG responses. Such evaluations are now possible, using gene-targeted mouse strains that produce only IgM, or isotype-switched IgG. A number of studies have revealed that IgM, produced either innately, or in response to antigen challenge, plays an important and perhaps underappreciated role in many microbial infections. Moreover, the characterization of the roles of various B cell subsets, in the production of IgM, and in host defense, has revealed important and divergent roles for B-1a and B-1b cells. This review will highlight studies in which IgM, in its own right, has been found to play an important role, not only in early immunity, but also in long-term protection, against a variety of microbial pathogens. Observations that long-lived IgM responses can be generated in vivo suggest that it may be feasible to target IgM production as part of vaccination strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Muramatsu, M., Kinoshita, K., Fagarasan, S., Yamada, S., Shinkai, Y., & Honjo, T. (2000) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00078-7 · Cited by 3,474
The Instructive Role of Innate Immunity in the Acquired Immune Response
Fearon, D. T., & Locksley, R. M. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5258.50 · Cited by 1,719
Martin, F., Oliver, A. M., & Kearney, J. F. (2001) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00129-7 · Cited by 985
Control of Early Viral and Bacterial Distribution and Disease by Natural Antibodies
Ochsenbein, A. F., Fehr, T., Lutz, C., Suter, M., Brombacher, F., Hengartner, H., & Zinkernagel, R. M. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5447.2156 · Cited by 910
Natural autoantibodies: from ‘horror autotoxicus’ to ‘gnothi seauton’
Avrameas, S. (1991) · Immunology Today · doi:10.1016/s0167-5699(05)80045-3 · Cited by 766
Impairment of T-cell-dependent B-cell responses and B-l cell development in CD19-deficient mice
Rickert, R. C., Rajewsky, K., & Roes, J. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/376352a0 · Cited by 664
Haas, K. M., Poe, J. C., Steeber, D. A., & Tedder, T. F. (2005) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2005.04.011 · Cited by 628
Role of natural and immune IgM antibodies in immune responses
Boes, M. (2000) · Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0161-5890(01)00025-6 · Cited by 602
Baumgarth, N., Herman, O. C., Jager, G. C., Brown, L. E., Herzenberg, L. A., & Chen, J. (2000) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.192.2.271 · Cited by 582
Origin of Murine B Cell Lineages
Kantor, A. B., & Herzenberg, L. A. (1993) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.iy.11.040193.002441 · Cited by 575
Cited by
Li, Z., Yi, Y., Luo, X., Xiong, N., Liu, Y., Li, S., Sun, R., Wang, Y., Hu, B., Chen, W., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.25727 · Cited by 1,771
The double life of a B-1 cell: self-reactivity selects for protective effector functions
Baumgarth, N. (2011) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2901 · Cited by 969
Bouquet, J., Soloski, M. J., Swei, A., Cheadle, C., Federman, S., Billaud, J.-N., Rebman, A. W., Kabre, B., Halpert, R., Boorgula, M., et al. (2016) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00100-16 · Cited by 101
Liegner, K. B. (2019) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics8020072 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Racine, R., & Winslow, G. M.
- Venue
- Immunology Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 79-85
- ISSN
- 0165-2478 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983538138
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IgM in microbial infections: Taken for granted? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.imlet.2009.06.003
- The paper
- Racine, R., & Winslow, G. M. (2009). IgM in microbial infections: Taken for granted? Immunology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2009.06.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.