Cited by 4,481Wound Healing and TreatmentsImmune cells in cancerCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 129 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Macrophages in Tissue Repair, Regeneration, and Fibrosis

Open access

Abstract

Inflammatory monocytes and resident tissue macrophages are key regulators of tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Following tissue injury, monocytes and macrophages undergo marked phenotypic and functional changes to play critical roles during the initiation, maintenance, and resolution phases of tissue repair. Disturbances in macrophage function can lead to aberrant repair, with uncontrolled inflammatory mediator and growth factor production, deficient generation of anti-inflammatory macrophages, or failed communication between macrophages and epithelial cells, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and stem or tissue progenitor cells all contributing to a state of persistent injury, which may lead to the development of pathological fibrosis. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms that instruct macrophages to adopt pro-inflammatory, pro-wound healing, pro-fibrotic, anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, pro-resolving, and tissue regenerating phenotypes following injury, and highlight how some of these mechanisms and macrophage activation states could be exploited therapeutically.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.015

Cites

129 of 129 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 129 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4,481

Metadata

Authors
Wynn, T. A., & Vannella, K. M.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Wynn, Thomas A.
Venue
Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
450-462
ISSN
1074-7613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2301044272
Cited by
4,481
References
129
Citations by year
2026: 673 · 2025: 638 · 2024: 564 · 2023: 511 · 2022: 504 · 2021: 475 · 2020: 399 · 2019: 299 · 2018: 228 · 2017: 136 · 2016: 35
FWCI
29.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Z01AI001019, Z01AI000829)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Keywords
macrophages, tissue repair, tissue regeneration, fibrosis, inflammatory monocytes, macrophage polarization, wound healing, inflammation resolution, macrophage-targeted therapy
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Communication, Cell Differentiation, Fibrosis, Humans, Macrophage Activation, Macrophages, Phenotype, Regeneration, Wound Healing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review