Cited by 48Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityPhytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications

Plants used in folk medicine: The potential of their hydromethanolic extracts against Candida species

Open access
Martins, Natália, Ferreira, Isabel C.F.R., Barros, Lillian, Carvalho, Ana Maria, Henriques, Mariana, Silva, Sónia·2015·Industrial Crops and Products

Abstract

Currently, opportunistic fungal infections are considered a serious problem regarding public health. Despite the advances towards the synthesis of new antifungal agents, an increasing incidence of drug-resistant microorganisms has been observed. In this sense, other alternatives are necessary. In the present work, the antifungal activity of extracts from ten different plants, commonly used in folk medicine, were evaluated against nineteen Candida strains, including C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis species. Although the majority of the extracts had no antimicrobial effect, Juglans regia extract was very effective, exerting an inhibitory effect against all the tested Candida strains, while Eucalyptus globulus was effective against seventeen of them. Pterospartum tridentatum and Rubus ulmifolius presented similar antifungal effects, being effective against six Candida strains. The diameter of halo ranged, respectively, between 9–14mm and 9–21mm to the mentioned plant extracts, and the MIC50 values evidenced mainly a fungistatic activity. Both extracts showed similar MIC50 values for C. albicans strains, while C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata were more sensible to E. globulus. Otherwise, all the C. tropicalis strains were more sensible to J. regia. Overall, hydromethanolic plant extracts could constitute promissory alternatives to the traditional antifungal agents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.12.033

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effects of Juglans regia and Eucalyptus globulus were assessed in more detail revealing a fungistatic and not fungicidal activity.

    “The effects of Juglans regia and Eucalyptus globulus were assessed in more detail revealing a fungistatic and not fungicidal activity [240].”

    From Candida glabrata Biofilms: How Far Have We Come? (2017) · cites this paper as [240]

  • Extracts from Juglans regia, Eucalyptus globulus, Pterospartum tridentatum, and Rubus ulmifolius were effective against several Candida species, especially C. glabrata, followed by C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis.

    “Extracts from Juglans regia, Eucalyptus globulus, Pterospartum tridentatum, and Rubus ulmifolius were also effective against several Candida species, especially C. glabrata, followed by C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis.”

    From Candida glabrata Biofilms: How Far Have We Come? (2017) · cites this paper as [240]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martins, N., Ferreira, I. C. F. R., Barros, L., Carvalho, A. M., Henriques, M., & Silva, S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Politécnica de Bragança (PT)
  • University of Minho (PT)
Corresponding author
  • Ferreira, Isabel C.F.R.
  • Silva, Sónia
Venue
Industrial Crops and Products
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
66
Pages
62-67
ISSN
0926-6690 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983793251
Cited by
48
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Industrial Crops and Products (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Programa Operacional Temático Factores de Competitividade
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PEst-OE/EQB/LA0023/2013, RECI/EBB-EBI/0179/2012, PTDC/SAU-MIC/119069/2010, PEst-OE/AGR/UI0690/2011, SFRH/BD/87658/2012)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications
Keywords
antifungal activity, Candida, Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis, plant extracts, folk medicine, Juglans regia, Eucalyptus globulus, Pterospartum tridentatum, Rubus ulmifolius, hydromethanolic extract, fungistatic activity, minimum inhibitory concentration, opportunistic fungal infection, drug-resistant fungi

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review