The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Agile supply chain management: where did it come from and where will it go in the era of digital transformation?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“NIT has been widely used in the digital transformation literature to investigate various aspects of digital transformation (Dubey et al., 2018b; Shashi et al., 2020; Verhoef et al., 2021).”
From Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy (2022) · cites this paper as Shashi et al., 2020
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues
Lu, Y. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005 · Cited by 3,012
Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x · Cited by 1,747
Wang, G., Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E. W. T., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.014 · Cited by 1,545
Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology
Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V (2006) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000600 · Cited by 1,063
Srinivasan, R., & Swink, M. (2018) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12746 · Cited by 885
Research works printed but not linked: 163
- Abdollahi, 2015, An integrated approach for supplier portfolio selection: Lean or agile?, Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 679, 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.019 · DOI · Paper page
- Agarwal, 2006, Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 173, 211, 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.12.005 · DOI
- Agrawal, 2001, University-to-industry knowledge transfer: Literature review and unanswered questions, International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 285, 10.1111/1468-2370.00069 · DOI
- Aitken, 2002, Understanding, implementing and exploiting agility and leanness, International Journal of Logistics, 5, 59, 10.1080/13675560110084139 · DOI
- Akter, 2017, Why PLS-SEM is suitable for complex modelling? An empirical illustration in big data analytics quality, Production Planning and Control, 28, 1011, 10.1080/09537287.2016.1267411 · DOI
- Alimardani, 2014, A novel hybrid model based in DEMATEL, ANP and TOPSIS for supplier selection in agile supply chain, International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 18, 179, 10.1504/IJSOM.2014.062000 · DOI
- Alimardani, 2013, A novel hybrid SWARA and VIKOR methodology for supplier selection in an agile environment, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19, 533, 10.3846/20294913.2013.814606 · DOI
- Arteta, 2004, A measure of agility as the complexity of the enterprise system, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 20, 495, 10.1016/j.rcim.2004.05.008 · DOI
- Baker, 2008, The design and operation of distribution centres within agile supply chains, International Journal of Production Economics, 111, 27, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.09.019 · DOI
- Barratt, 2004, Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain, Supply Chain Management: an international journal, 9, 30, 10.1108/13598540410517566 · DOI
- Battistella, 2017, Cultivating business model agility through focused capabilities: A multiple case study, Journal of Business Research, 73, 65, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.007 · DOI
- Beikkhakhian, 2015, The application of ISM model in evaluating agile suppliers selection criteria and ranking suppliers using fuzzy TOPSIS-AHP methods, Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 6224, 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.035 · DOI
- Benckendorff, 2013, A network analysis of tourism research, Annals of Tourism Research, 43, 121, 10.1016/j.annals.2013.04.005 · DOI
- Bidhandi, 2017, Effects of supply chain agility on profitability, Business Process Management Journal, 23, 1064, 10.1108/BPMJ-05-2016-0089 · DOI
- Blome, 2013, Antecedents and enablers of supply chain agility and its effect on performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective, International Journal of Production Research, 51, 1295, 10.1080/00207543.2012.728011 · DOI
- Bottani, 2010, Profile and enablers of agile companies: An empirical investigation, International Journal of Production Economics, 125, 251, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.02.016 · DOI
- Braunscheidel, 2009, The organizational antecedents of a firm's supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response, Journal of Operations Management, 27, 119, 10.1016/j.jom.2008.09.006 · DOI
- Brettel, 2014, How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: An Industry 4.0 Perspective, International journal of mechanical, industrial science and engineering, 8, 37
- Brusset, 2016, Does supply chain visibility enhance agility?, International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 46, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.10.005 · DOI
- Burgess, 1994, Making the leap to agility: defining and achieving agile manufacturing through business process redesign and business network redesign, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14, 23, 10.1108/01443579410068620 · DOI
- Callon, 1983, From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis, Social Science Information, 22, 191, 10.1177/053901883022002003 · DOI · Paper page
- Cegarra-Navarro, 2016, Structured knowledge processes and firm performance: The role of organizational agility, Journal of Business Research, 69, 1544, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.014 · DOI
- Sharifi, 1999, A methodology for achieving agility in a manufacturing organisation: an introduction, International Journal of Production Economics, 62, 7, 10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00217-5 · DOI
- Shashi Centobelli, 2020, Managing supply chain resilience to pursue business and environmental strategies, Business Strategy and the Environment, 29, 1215, 10.1002/bse.2428 · DOI
- Cerruti, 2016, Characterizing agile supply partnerships in the fashion industry, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36, 923, 10.1108/IJOPM-03-2015-0181 · DOI
- Chakravarty, 2013, Information technology competencies, organizational agility, and firm performance: Enabling and facilitating roles, Information Systems Research, 24, 976, 10.1287/isre.2013.0500 · DOI
- Chan, 2017, The effects of strategic and manufacturing flexibilities and supply chain agility on firm performance in the fashion industry, European Journal of Operational Research, 259, 486, 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.11.006 · DOI
- Chiang, 2012, An empirical investigation of the impact of strategic sourcing and flexibility on firm's supply chain agility, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32, 49, 10.1108/01443571211195736 · DOI
- Christopher, 2000, The agile supply chain: Competing in volatile markets, Industrial Marketing Management, 29, 37, 10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00110-8 · DOI
- Coreynen, 2017, Boosting servitization through digitization: Pathways and dynamic resource configurations for manufacturers, Industrial Marketing Management, 60, 42, 10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.04.012 · DOI
- Costantino, 2012, A model for supply management of agile manufacturing supply chains, International Journal of Production Economics, 135, 451, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.08.021 · DOI
- Day, 1994, The capabilities of market-driven organizations, Journal of Marketing, 58, 37, 10.1177/002224299405800404 · DOI
- DeGroote, 2013, The impact of IT on supply chain agility and firm performance: An empirical investigation, International Journal of Information Management, 33, 909, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.09.001 · DOI
- Delen, 2018, Research challenges and opportunities in business analytics, Journal of Business Analytics, 1, 2, 10.1080/2573234X.2018.1507324 · DOI
- Dingsøyr, 2012, A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development, Journal of Systems and Software, 85, 1213, 10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.033 · DOI
- Droge, 2012, Does supply chain integration mediate the relationships between product/process strategy and service performance? An empirical study, International Journal of Production Economics, 137, 250, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.005 · DOI
- Dubey, 2018, Big data analytics capability in supply chain agility: the moderating effect of organizational flexibility, Management Decision
- Urciuoli, 2017, Adapting supply chain management strategies to security–an analysis of existing gaps and recommendations for improvement, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 20, 276, 10.1080/13675567.2016.1219703 · DOI
- van Eck, 2014, CitNetExplorer: A new software tool for analysing and visualizing citation networks, Journal of Informetrics, 8, 802, 10.1016/j.joi.2014.07.006 · DOI
- van Eck, 2010, A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 2405, 10.1002/asi.21421 · DOI
- Eckstein, 2015, The performance impact of supply chain agility and supply chain adaptability: The moderating effect of product complexity, International Journal of Production Research, 53, 3028, 10.1080/00207543.2014.970707 · DOI · Paper page
- Eisenhardt, 2000, Dynamic capabilities: what are they?, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105, 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
- Ertz, 2018, Sustainability in the collaborative economy: A bibliometric analysis reveals emerging interest, Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 1073, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.095 · DOI
- Felipe, 2016, An explanatory and predictive model for organizational agility, Journal of Business Research, 69, 4624, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.014 · DOI
- Fisher, 1997, What is the right supply chain for your product?, Harvard Business Review, 75, 105
- Galvagno, 2014, Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review, Managing Service Quality, 24, 643, 10.1108/MSQ-09-2013-0187 · DOI
- Ganguly, 2009, Evaluating agility in corporate enterprises, International Journal of Production Economics, 118, 410, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.12.009 · DOI
- Geng, 2020, Sustainable design for users: a literature review and bibliometric analysis, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 29824, 10.1007/s11356-020-09283-1 · DOI
- Giachetti, 2003, Analysis of the structural measures of flexibility and agility using a measurement theoretical framework, International Journal of Production Economics, 86, 47, 10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00004-5 · DOI
- Gligor, 2014, The role of demand management in achieving supply chain agility, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19, 577, 10.1108/SCM-10-2013-0363 · DOI
- Gligor, 2015, Performance outcomes of supply chain agility: When should you be agile?, Journal of Operations Management, 33–34, 71, 10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.008 · DOI
- Gligor, 2014, The road to supply chain agility: an RBV perspective on the role of logistics capabilities, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 25, 160, 10.1108/IJLM-07-2012-0062 · DOI
- Gligor, 2012, Understanding the role of logistics capabilities in achieving supply chain agility: A systematic literature review, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17, 438, 10.1108/13598541211246594 · DOI
- Gligor, 2016, An exploration of the strategic antecedents of firm supply chain agility: The role of a firm's orientations, International Journal of Production Economics, 179, 24, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.05.008 · DOI
- Gligor, 2013, A multidisciplinary approach to supply chain agility: Conceptualization and scale development, Journal of Business Logistics, 34, 94, 10.1111/jbl.12012 · DOI · Paper page
- Goldman, 1993, Management, technology and agility: the emergence of a new era in manufacturing, International Journal of Technology Management, 8, 18
- Grönroos, 2004, The relationship marketing process: communication, interaction, dialogue, value, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 19, 99, 10.1108/08858620410523981 · DOI
- Gunasekaran, 1998, Agile Manufacturing: Enablers and an Implementation Framework, International Journal of Production Research, 26, 1223, 10.1080/002075498193291 · DOI
- Hasan, 2007, A study of barriers to agile manufacturing, International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 2, 1, 10.1504/IJASM.2007.015679 · DOI
- Hazen, 2017, Enterprise architecture: A competence-based approach to achieving agility and firm performance, International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 566, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.08.022 · DOI
- Hillebrand, 2003, The relationship between internal and external cooperation: Literature review and propositions, Journal of Business Research, 56, 735, 10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00258-2 · DOI
- van Hoek, 2001, Measuring agile capabilities in the supply chain, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21, 126, 10.1108/01443570110358495 · DOI
- Huang, 2012, The role of IT in achieving operational agility: A case study of Haier, China, International Journal of Information Management, 32, 294, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.02.001 · DOI
- Inman, 2011, Agile manufacturing: Relation to JIT, operational performance and firm performance, Journal of Operations Management, 29, 343, 10.1016/j.jom.2010.06.001 · DOI
- Ismail, 2006, A balanced approach to building agile supply chains, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 36, 431, 10.1108/09600030610677384 · DOI
- Jain, 2008, A new approach for evaluating agility in supply chains using Fuzzy Association Rules Mining, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 21, 367, 10.1016/j.engappai.2007.07.004 · DOI
- Jüttner, 2007, Demand chain management-integrating marketing and supply chain management, Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 377, 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.10.003 · DOI
- Katayama, 1999, Agility, adaptability and leanness: A comparison of concepts and a study of practice, International Journal of Production Economics, 60, 43, 10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00129-7 · DOI
- Khalili-Damghani, 2012, A three-stage fuzzy DEA approach to measure performance of a serial process including JIT practices, agility indices, and goals in supply chains, International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 13, 147, 10.1504/IJSOM.2012.048828 · DOI
- Khalili-Damghani, 2011, A hybrid approach based on fuzzy DEA and simulation to measure the efficiency of agility in supply chain: Real case of dairy industry, International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 6, 163, 10.1080/17509653.2011.10671160 · DOI
- Khalili-Damghani, 2013, A new fuzzy network data envelopment analysis model for measuring the performance of agility in supply chains, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 69, 291, 10.1007/s00170-013-5021-y · DOI
- Khan, 2009, Impact of agile supply chains' delivery practices on firms' performance: cluster analysis and validation, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14, 41, 10.1108/13598540910927296 · DOI
- Khan, 2008, Strategic sourcing for supply chain agility and firms' performance: A study of Indian manufacturing sector, Management Decision, 46, 1508, 10.1108/00251740810920010 · DOI
- Kim, 2017, The impact of supplier innovativeness, information sharing and strategic sourcing on improving supply chain agility: Global supply chain perspective, International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 42, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.007 · DOI
- Koufteros, 2010, Organizational integration for product development: the effects on glitches, on-time execution of engineering change orders, and market success, Decision Sciences, 41, 49, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2009.00259.x · DOI
- Kumar, 1995, A methodology for assessing time-based competitive advantage of manufacturing firms, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15, 36, 10.1108/01443579510080409 · DOI
- Larson, 2016, A review and future direction of agile, business intelligence, analytics and data science, International Journal of Information Management, 36, 700, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.04.013 · DOI · Paper page
- Lee, 2004, The triple-A supply chain, Harvard Business Review, 82, 102
- Lee, 2015, Assessing business impacts of agility criterion and order allocation strategy in multi-criteria supplier selection, Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 1136, 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.041 · DOI
- Li, 2006, Enhancing agility by timely sharing of supply information, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11, 425, 10.1108/13598540610682444 · DOI
- Lim, 2012, A multi-agent system using iterative bidding mechanism to enhance manufacturing agility, Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 8259, 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.160 · DOI
- Lin, 2006, Agility index in the supply chain, International Journal of Production Economics, 100, 285, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.013 · DOI
- Liu, 2013, The impact of IT capabilities on firm performance: The mediating roles of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility, Decision Support Systems, 54, 1452, 10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.016 · DOI
- Liu, 2015, Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: A bibliometric analysis, Scientometrics, 103, 135, 10.1007/s11192-014-1517-y · DOI
- Lowry, 2016, Creating agile organizations through IT: The influence of internal IT service perceptions on IT service quality and IT agility, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 25, 211, 10.1016/j.jsis.2016.05.002 · DOI
- Luo, 2009, Supplier selection in agile supply chains: An information-processing model and an illustration, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 15, 249, 10.1016/j.pursup.2009.05.004 · DOI
- Mason-Jones, 1997, Information enrichment: designing the supply chain for competitive advantage, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2, 137, 10.1108/13598549710191304 · DOI
- Mason-Jones, 1999, Total cycle time compression and the agile supply chain, International Journal of Production Economics, 62, 61, 10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00221-7 · DOI
- Masson, 2007, Managing complexity in agile global fashion industry supply chains, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 18, 238, 10.1108/09574090710816959 · DOI
- Matawale, 2013, Agility appraisement and identification of agile barriers in a supply chain, International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 16, 478, 10.1504/IJSOM.2013.057510 · DOI
- Matawale, 2016, Supplier/partner selection in agile supply chain: Application of vague set as a decision making tool, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23, 866, 10.1108/BIJ-03-2014-0020 · DOI
- Mishra, 2014, Agility evaluation in fuzzy context: Influence of decision-makers’ risk bearing attitude, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 21, 1084, 10.1108/BIJ-04-2012-0026 · DOI
- Mishra, 2015, Application of fuzzy integrated MULTIMOORA method towards supplier/partner selection in agile supply chain, International Journal of Operational Research, 22, 466, 10.1504/IJOR.2015.068562 · DOI
- Mokadem, 2017, The classification of supplier selection criteria with respect to lean or agile manufacturing strategies, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28, 232, 10.1108/JMTM-04-2016-0050 · DOI
- Monahan, 2015, Sharing supply chain data in the digital era, MIT Sloan Management Review, 57, 95
- Moon, 2017, Key drivers of an agile, collaborative fast fashion supply chain: Dongdaemun fashion market, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 21, 278, 10.1108/JFMM-07-2016-0060 · DOI
- Mostaghel, 2016, Innovation and technology for the elderly: Systematic literature review, Journal of Business Research, 69, 4896, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.049 · DOI
- Mussomeli, 2016, The rise of the digital supply network: Industry 4.0 enables the digital transformation of supply chains, Deloitte Insights
- Naylor, 1999, Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain, International Journal of Production Economics, 62, 107, 10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00223-0 · DOI
- Nemkova, 2017, The impact of agility on the market performance of born-global firms: An exploratory study of the “Tech City” innovation cluster, Journal of Business Research, 80, 257, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.04.017 · DOI
- Patel, 2017, Evaluation of agility in supply chains: A case study of an Indian manufacturing organization, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28, 212, 10.1108/JMTM-09-2016-0125 · DOI
- Perkmann, 2007, University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 259, 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x · DOI
- Potdar, 2017, Performance analysis of agile manufacturing: A case study on an Indian auto component manufacturer, Measuring Business Excellence, 21, 117, 10.1108/MBE-04-2016-0024 · DOI
- Power, 2001, Critical success factors in agile supply chain management: An empirical study, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 31, 247, 10.1108/09600030110394923 · DOI
- Prater, 2001, International supply chain agility-Tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21, 823, 10.1108/01443570110390507 · DOI
- Qin, 2016, A categorical framework of manufacturing for industry 4.0 and beyond, Procedia Cirp, 52, 173, 10.1016/j.procir.2016.08.005 · DOI
- Qrunfleh, 2013, Lean and agile supply chain strategies and supply chain responsiveness: The role of strategic supplier partnership and postponement, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18, 571, 10.1108/SCM-01-2013-0015 · DOI
- Radicchi, 2004, Defining and identifying communities in networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 2658, 10.1073/pnas.0400054101 · DOI · Paper page
- Ralston, 2015, A structure–conduct–performance perspective of how strategic supply chain integration affects firm performance, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51, 47, 10.1111/jscm.12064 · DOI
- Ravald, 1996, The value concept and relationship marketing, European Journal of Marketing, 30, 19, 10.1108/03090569610106626 · DOI · Paper page
- Ren, 2009, A decision-support framework for agile enterprise partnering, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 41, 180, 10.1007/s00170-008-1443-3 · DOI
- Richey, 2016, A global exploration of big data in the supply chain, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 46, 710, 10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2016-0134 · DOI
- Roberts, 2012, Investigating firm's customer agility and firm performance: The importance of aligning sense and respond capabilities, Journal of Business Research, 65, 579, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.009 · DOI
- Routroy, 2015, Measurement of manufacturing agility: A case study, Measuring Business Excellence, 19, 1, 10.1108/MBE-06-2014-0018 · DOI
- Routroy, 2015, Performance analysis of agile supply chain, International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 29, 180, 10.1504/IJMTM.2015.069255 · DOI
- Sahu, 2016, Appraisal of partner enterprises under GTFNS environment: Agile supply chain, International Journal of Decision Support System Technology, 8, 1, 10.4018/IJDSST.2016070101 · DOI
- Samantra, 2013, Agility appraisal for integrated supply chain using generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers set, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68, 1491, 10.1007/s00170-013-4937-6 · DOI
- Sambamurthy, 2003, Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms, MIS Quarterly, 24, 237, 10.2307/30036530 · DOI
- Samdantsoodol, 2017, Predicting the relationships between virtual enterprises and agility in supply chains, Expert Systems with Applications, 84, 58, 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.04.037 · DOI
- Sangari, 2015, Business intelligence competence, agile capabilities, and agile performance in supply chain: An empirical study, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 26, 356, 10.1108/IJLM-01-2013-0012 · DOI
- Sangari, 2015, Developing a practical evaluation framework for identifying critical factors to achieve supply chain agility, Measurement, 62, 205, 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.11.002 · DOI
- Sarkis, 2001, Benchmarking for agility, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 8, 88, 10.1108/14635770110389816 · DOI
- Sarkis, 2007, A strategic model for agile virtual enterprise partner selection, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27, 1213, 10.1108/01443570710830601 · DOI
- Schoenherr, 2015, Data science, predictive analytics, and big data in supply chain management: Current state and future potential, Journal of Business Logistics, 36, 120, 10.1111/jbl.12082 · DOI
- Shams, 2016, Capacity building for sustained competitive advantage: a conceptual Framework, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 34, 671, 10.1108/MIP-08-2015-0161 · DOI
- Shin, 2015, Strategic agility of Korean small and medium enterprises and its influence on operational and firm performance, International Journal of Production Economics, 168, 181, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.015 · DOI · Paper page
- Siddhartha, 2016, Review of agile supply chain implementation frameworks, International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 8, 10.1504/IJBPSCM.2016.075999 · DOI
- Sieger, 2000, A metric for agility measurement in product development, IISE Transactions, 32, 637, 10.1080/07408170008967422 · DOI
- Slater, 1995, Market orientation and the learning organization, Journal of Marketing, 59, 63, 10.1177/002224299505900306 · DOI
- Storey, 2005, The barriers to customer responsive supply chain management, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25, 242, 10.1108/01443570510581853 · DOI
- Swafford, 2006, The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: Scale development and model testing, Journal of Operations Management, 24, 170, 10.1016/j.jom.2005.05.002 · DOI
- Swafford, 2008, Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility, International Journal of Production Economics, 116, 288, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.09.002 · DOI
- Tarafdar, 2017, Agile supply chain strategy and supply chain performance: Complementary roles of supply chain practices and information systems capability for agility, International Journal of Production Research, 55, 925, 10.1080/00207543.2016.1203079 · DOI
- Teece, 1997, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
- Tse, 2016, Embracing supply chain agility: An investigation in the electronics industry, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21, 140, 10.1108/SCM-06-2015-0237 · DOI
- Tsourveloudis, 2002, On the measurement of enterprise agility, Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 33, 329, 10.1023/A:1015096909316 · DOI
- Um, 2017, Improving supply chain flexibility and agility through variety management, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 28, 464, 10.1108/IJLM-07-2015-0113 · DOI
- Um, 2017, The impact of supply chain agility on business performance in a high level customization environment, International Journal of Operational Research, 10, 10
- Vargo, 2008, Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 1, 10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Vendrell-Herrero, 2017, Servitization, digitization and supply chain interdependency, Industrial Marketing Management, 60, 69, 10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.06.013 · DOI
- Vickery, 2010, Supply chain information technologies and organisational initiatives: Complementary versus independent effects on agility and firm performance, International Journal of Production Research, 48, 7025, 10.1080/00207540903348353 · DOI
- Vogel, 2020, A bibliometric review of the leadership development field: How we got here, where we are, and where we are headed, The Leadership Quarterly
- Waller, 2013, Data science, predictive analytics, and Big Data: a revolution that will transform supply chain design and management, Journal of Business Logistics, 34, 77, 10.1111/jbl.12010 · DOI · Paper page
- Weber, 2002, Measuring supply chain agility in the virtual organization, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 32, 577, 10.1108/09600030210442595 · DOI
- Wu, 2009, A model for continuous improvement in supplier selection in agile supply chains, Knowledge and Process Management, 16, 85, 10.1002/kpm.327 · DOI
- Wu, 2010, Formulating partner selection criteria for agile supply chains: A Dempster–Shafer belief acceptability optimisation approach, International Journal of Production Economics, 125, 284, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.02.010 · DOI
- Wu, 2011, A literature review of decision-making models and approaches for partner selection in agile supply chains, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 17, 256, 10.1016/j.pursup.2011.09.002 · DOI
- Wu, 2012, A dynamic feedback model for partner selection in agile supply chains, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32, 79, 10.1108/01443571211195745 · DOI
- Wu, 2014, Partner selection in agile supply chains: A fuzzy intelligent approach, Production Planning and Control, 25, 821, 10.1080/09537287.2013.766037 · DOI
- Wu, 2009, An analytic network process-mixed integer multi-objective programming model for partner selection in agile supply chains, Production Planning and Control, 20, 254, 10.1080/09537280902856047 · DOI
- Wu, 2017, Achieving competitive advantage through supply chain agility under uncertainty: A novel multi-criteria decision-making structure, International Journal of Production Economics, 190, 96, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.027 · DOI
- Wu, 2016, Smart supply chain management: a review and implications for future research, The International Journal of Logistics Management, 27, 395, 10.1108/IJLM-02-2014-0035 · DOI
- Yang, 2012, Boosting firm performance via enterprise agility and network structure, Management Decision, 50, 1022, 10.1108/00251741211238319 · DOI
- Yang, 2014, Supply chain agility: Securing performance for Chinese manufacturers, International Journal of Production Economics, 150, 104, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.12.018 · DOI
- Yang, 2002, Agility evaluation of mass customization product manufacturing, Journal of Material Processing Technology, 129, 640, 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00674-X · DOI
- Yauch, 2011, Measuring agility as a performance outcome, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 22, 384, 10.1108/17410381111112738 · DOI
- Yli-Ojanperä, 2018, Adapting an agile manufacturing concept to the reference architecture model industry 4.0: A survey and case study, Journal of Industrial Information Integration
- Yusuf, 2004, Agile supply chain capabilities: Determinants of competitive objectives, European Journal of Operational Research, 159, 10.1016/j.ejor.2003.08.022 · DOI
- Yusuf, 2014, A relational study of supply chain agility, competitiveness and business performance in the oil and gas industry, International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 531, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.10.009 · DOI
- Yusuf, 2014, A study of the diffusion of agility and cluster competitiveness in the oil and gas supply chains, International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 498, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.010 · DOI
- Yusuf, 1999, Agile manufacturing: The drivers, concepts and attributes, International Journal of Production Economics, 62, 33, 10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00219-9 · DOI
- Zhang, 2011, Towards theory building in agile manufacturing strategies - Case studies of an agility taxonomy, International Journal of Production Economics, 131, 303, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.08.010 · DOI
- Zhang, 2000, A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20, 496, 10.1108/01443570010314818 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo
Kraus, S., Durst, S., Ferreira, J. J., Veiga, P. M., Kailer, N., & Weinmann, A. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102466 · Cited by 1,786
“Shashi, Centobelli, Cerchione, and Ertz (2020) descriptively and analytically reported how technology was addressed within the agile supply chain literature, mapping a nomological network of agile supply chain research.”
BackgroundMastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy
AlNuaimi, B. K., Kumar Singh, S., Ren, S., Budhwar, P., & Vorobyev, D. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.038 · Cited by 820
“NIT has been widely used in the digital transformation literature to investigate various aspects of digital transformation (Dubey et al., 2018b; Shashi et al., 2020; Verhoef et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodBlockchain technology for bridging trust, traceability and transparency in circular supply chain
Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., del Vecchio, P., Oropallo, E., & Secundo, G. (2021) · Information Manager (The) · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103508 · Cited by 729
Self-citationRedesigning Supply Chains using Blockchain-Enabled Circular Economy and COVID-19 Experiences
Nandi, S., Sarkis, J., Hervani, A. A., & Helms, M. M. (2020) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.019 · Cited by 544
Zhuo, C., & Chen, J. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122378 · Cited by 395
Knowledge management and digital transformation for Industry 4.0: a structured literature review
Machado, A. D. B., Secinaro, S., Calandra, D., & Lanzalonga, F. (2021) · Knowledge Management Research & Practice · doi:10.1080/14778238.2021.2015261 · Cited by 315
“For this research, bibliometric analysis can avoid data selection biases because it focuses on quantitative analysis, which could help researchers focus on important and relevant papers (Shashi et al., 2020).”
MethodSustainability trends and gaps in the textile, apparel and fashion industries
Abbate, S., Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Nadeem, S. P., & Riccio, E. (2023) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-022-02887-2 · Cited by 390
“In particular, the co-occurrence analysis of keywords is an effective method for identifying research themes since it helps analyse the paper’s content and assess the co-occurrence relationship between different concepts (Shashi et al., 2020a, 2020b).”
InfluentialSelf-citationModeling the effects of digital transformation in Indian manufacturing industry
Singh, S., Sharma, M., & Dhir, S. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101763 · Cited by 254
Ciampi, F., Faraoni, M., Ballerini, J., & Meli, F. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121383 · Cited by 259
“…analysed by means of different approaches (Nadkarni and Prügl, 2021; Verhoef et al., 2021; Vial, 2019), the digitalization of the supply chain (Shashi et al., 2020), digital innovation in knowledge management systems (Di Vaio et al., 2021), digital servitization in 4 manufacturing (Paschou…”
MethodCartwright, S., Liu, H., & Raddats, C. (2021) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.06.005 · Cited by 240
Distinguishing digitization and digitalization: A systematic review and conceptual framework
Gradillas, M., & Thomas, L. D. W. (2023) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12690 · Cited by 208
Ly, B. (2023) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-023-01377-8 · Cited by 202
“The NIT model has been extensively employed in the literature on DT to examine various aspects of the process (Shashi et al., 2020; Verhoef et al., 2021).”
MethodOrganizational Agility in Industry 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review
Mrugalska, B., & Ahmed, J. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13158272 · Cited by 204
Wang, S., & Zhang, H. (2024) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3152 · Cited by 166
Digital technology deployment and firm resilience: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic
Li, L., Wang, Z., Ye, F., Chen, L., & Zhan, Y. (2022) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.06.002 · Cited by 159
“Given that DTs can help firms monitor and control their supply chains (Shashia et al., 2020), existing studies primarily investigate the effect of specific DTs, such as big data analytics (Papadopoulos et al., 2017) and blockchain technology (Dubey et al., 2020), on a firm ’ s resilience to supply…”
BackgroundInfluentialDigital Transformation and Strategic Management: a Systematic Review of the Literature
Rêgo, B. S., Jayantilal, S., Ferreira, J., & Carayannis, E. (2021) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-021-00853-3 · Cited by 136
“Another article develops a study on the strategy portfolio in the supply chain sector (Shashi et al., 2020).”
BackgroundDubey, R., Bryde, D., Blome, C., Dwivedi, Y. K., Childe, S. J., & Foropon, C. R. H. (2024) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109166 · Cited by 170
Mathiyazhagan, K., Agarwal, V., Appolloni, A., Saikouk, T., & Gnanavelbabu, A. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120982 · Cited by 123
Albloushi, B., Alharmoodi, A., Jabeen, F., Mehmood, K., & Farouk, S. (2022) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-03-2021-0194 · Cited by 97
Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Esposito, E., & Oropallo, E. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120463 · Cited by 115
Self-citationMalik, M., Raziq, M., Sarwar, N., & Tariq, A. (2024) · Benchmarking : An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-04-2023-0283 · Cited by 90
Ngo, V. M., Nguyen, H. H., Pham, H., Nguyen, H. M., & Truong, P. V. D. (2022) · Operations Management Research · doi:10.1007/s12063-022-00326-z · Cited by 109
“Therefore, utilizing digital technologies is not a new concept in SC management practices (Büyüközkan and Göçer 2018; Shashi et al. 2020).”
MethodInfluentialManaging sustainability in luxury industry to pursue circular economy strategies
Shashi, Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Mittal, A. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2630 · Cited by 78
Self-citationKareem, S., Fehrer, J. A., Shalpegin, T., & Stringer, C. (2024) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3990 · Cited by 69
Yin, W., & Ran, W. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14137690 · Cited by 89
Rajala, A., & Hautala-Kankaanpää, T. (2023) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/jbim-01-2022-0024 · Cited by 65
Hangl, J., Behrens, V. J., & Krause, S. (2022) · Logistics · doi:10.3390/logistics6030063 · Cited by 63
Workforce agility: a systematic literature review and a research agenda proposal
Tessarini, G., & Saltorato, P. (2021) · Innovar · doi:10.15446/innovar.v31n81.95582 · Cited by 61
“Structure Shared goals Sohrabi et al. (2014). Empowerment and decentralization of decision-making Alavi et al. (2014); Muduli (2016, 2017); Muduli and Pandya (2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialFang, M., Liu, F., Xiao, S. S., & Park, K. (2023) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-12-2021-0545 · Cited by 85
The fourth industrial revolution of supply chains: A tertiary study
Barata, J. (2021) · Journal of engineering and technology management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2021.101624 · Cited by 58
“…is an important driver for agility in supply chains but must be integrated with the development of capabilities (e.g., customer service, information sharing, or differentiation ) and relational aspects that are not merely technological, as happens in supplier selection (Shashi et al., 2020).”
Secinaro, S. F., Brescia, V., Lanzalonga, F., & Santoro, G. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.032 · Cited by 64
Atanassova, I., Bednár, P., Khan, H., & Khan, Z. (2024) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.12.008 · Cited by 95
Navigating the manufacturing revolution: identifying the digital transformation antecedents
Bilal, M., Zhao, X.-C., Wu, J.-Y., Sohu, J. M., & Akhta, S. (2024) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-09-2023-1722 · Cited by 52
Yin, W. (2022) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-022-22917-w · Cited by 76
“Digital technologies, for example, appear to be a required but insufficient necessary condition for achieving flexible supply networks in the research of agile supply chains and digital transformation (Shashi et al. 2020).”
BackgroundAlkhatib, S. F., & Momani, R. A. (2023) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci13020040 · Cited by 72
“Many firms have used SCF to build capabilities and adapt changes to match market requirements so that they may achieve a competitive advantage and superior business performance (Centobelli et al. 2020).”
BackgroundMethodLu, Q., Zhou, Y., Luan, Z., & Song, H. Z. (2023) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-10-2022-0684 · Cited by 58
The Factors Affecting Digital Transformation in Vietnam Logistics Enterprises
Viet, H. L., & Quoc, H. D. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12081825 · Cited by 43
“NIT refers to many resources, factors, and barriers affecting the digital transformation process, as well as to advantages and disadvantages when implementing digital transformation in enterprises [14].”
BackgroundKnowledge hiding in organization: A comprehensive literature review and future research agenda
Garg, N., Kumar, C., & Ganguly, A. (2021) · Knowledge and Process Management · doi:10.1002/kpm.1695 · Cited by 43
Industry 4.0 and supply chain. A Systematic Science Mapping analysis
Núñez‐Merino, M., Marín, J. M. M., Moyano‐Fuentes, J., & Castaño-Moraga, C. A. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121788 · Cited by 50
Yang, H., Shi, X., Bhutto, M. Y., & Ertz, M. (2024) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2024.100462 · Cited by 56
Self-citationSupply chain agility and performance: evidence from a meta-analysis
Alfalla-Luque, R., Luján-García, D., & Marin-Garcia, J. A. (2023) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-05-2022-0316 · Cited by 63
What we learn is what we earn from sustainable and circular construction
Shashi, Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Ertz, M., & Oropallo, E. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135183 · Cited by 38
Self-citationEldem, B., Kluczek, A., & Baginski, J. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14105855 · Cited by 38
Efficiency measures of emergency departments: an Italian systematic literature review
Laura, D. D., D’Angiolella, L. S., Mantovani, L. G., Squassabia, G., Clemente, F., Santalucia, I., Improta, G., & Triassi, M. (2021) · BMJ Open Quality · doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001058 · Cited by 80
Heikinheimo, M., Hautamäki, P., Julkunen, S., & Koponen, J. P. (2025) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.01.006 · Cited by 53
The effect of supply chain digitalisation on a firm’s performance
Wang, M., & Prajogo, D. I. (2024) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-09-2023-0629 · Cited by 69
Enterprise digital transformation and supply chain stability
Shi, H., Liu, Y., & Yang, Y. (2024) · Finance research letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2024.105299 · Cited by 41
Massari, G. F., Nacchiero, R., & Giannoccaro, I. (2023) · Resources Conservation & Recycling Advances · doi:10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200189 · Cited by 54
Munir, A., Hussain, A., Farooq, M. U., Habib, M. S., & Shahzad, F. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151410896 · Cited by 43
Lill, P. A., & Wald, A. E. (2021) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102276 · Cited by 41
Koç, E., Delibaş, M. B., & Anadol, Y. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14148928 · Cited by 34
Supply Chain Digitalization and Agility: How Does Firm Innovation Matter in Companies?
Wang, M., Hill, A., Liu, Y., Hwang, K., & Lim, M. K. (2025) · Journal of Business Logistics · doi:10.1111/jbl.70007 · Cited by 40
“Digital technologies may contribute to SC agility (Shashi et al. 2020; Swafford, Ghosh, and Murthy 2008; Vial 2019).”
InfluentialLi, H., Tang, H., Zhou, W., & Wan, X. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.971971 · Cited by 40
Ngo, V. M., Pham, H., & Nguyen, H. H. (2022) · International Journal of Emerging Markets · doi:10.1108/ijoem-10-2021-1561 · Cited by 63
Organizational agility and firm performance: The role of architectural marketing capabilities
Bekos, G. S., Jaakkola, M., & Chari, S. (2025) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.01.005 · Cited by 38
Avinash, B., & Joseph, G. (2024) · Journal of Health Organization and Management · doi:10.1108/jhom-03-2024-0076 · Cited by 31
Digital transformation for crisis preparedness: service employees’ perspective
Leo, C., Laud, G., & Chou, C. Y. (2022) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-07-2021-0249 · Cited by 47
Abbas, M. G., Wang, Z., Ullah, H., Mohsin, M., Abbas, H., & Mahmood, M. R. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-17542-y · Cited by 36
RetractedGhosh, S., Hughes, M., Hughes, P., & Hodgkinson, I. R. (2025) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103240 · Cited by 34
Chouhan, M., Rajesh, R., & Sahu, R. (2024) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2024.100735 · Cited by 28
A holonic architecture for the supply chain performance in industry 4.0 context
Zekhnini, K., Cherrafi, A., Bouhaddou, I., Benabdellah, A. C., & Raut, R. D. (2021) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2021.1999912 · Cited by 29
Digital transformation in supply chains: Current applications, contributions and challenges
Özkanlısoy, Ö., & Akkartal, E. (2021) · Business And Management Studies An International Journal · doi:10.15295/bmij.v9i1.1673 · Cited by 65
“Centobelli et al. (2020) examined 90 articles on agile supply chains in their studies and presented an integrative effect of these digitalisation articles.”
BackgroundLi, G., Du, K., Liu, L., & Su, F. P. (2025) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102934 · Cited by 31
Operationalizing Mass Customization in Manufacturing SMEs—A Systematic Literature Review
Bouchard, S., Gamache, S., & Abdul-Nour, G. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15043028 · Cited by 35
Xiong, L., Ning, J., Wang, J., & Dong, Y. (2021) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108358 · Cited by 30
Leadership style's role in fostering supply chain agility amid geopolitical shocks
Ali, I., Gligor, D. M., Balta, M., & Papadopoulos, T. (2025) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.11.015 · Cited by 26
Jong, C., & Ganzaroli, A. (2023) · VOLUNTAS - International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations · doi:10.1007/s11266-023-00597-5 · Cited by 25
“DT strategies are often associated with the adoption of lean and agile approaches to management (Centobelli et al., 2020; Moi & Cabiddu, 2021).”
Adoption of Electric Vehicles: Purchase Intentions and Consumer Behaviors Research in Turkey
Şenyapar, H. N. D., Akil, M., & Dokur, E. (2023) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440231180586 · Cited by 25
“Objectivity has been ensured in the data accessed by the application of the specified definition and limitation processes in the selection of the articles to be used in the bibliometric analysis (Centobelli et al., 2020).”
MethodLi, G., Yu, H., & Lu, M. (2022) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr10101958 · Cited by 25
“The agile supply chain is a vital example of digital transformation, and it can cope with market instability, handle competitive pressures, and strengthen operational and organizational performance [50].”
BackgroundAgility and Industry 4.0 Implementation Strategy in a Quebec Manufacturing SME
Bouchard, S., Abdulnour, G., & Gamache, S. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14137884 · Cited by 25
Bhattacharyya, S., & Kumar, S. (2021) · Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management · doi:10.1108/jstpm-06-2021-0084 · Cited by 25
Additive manufacturing technology adoption for supply chain agility: a systematic search and review
Naghshineh, B. (2024) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2024.2356629 · Cited by 29
“To this end, many firms tend to capitalise on digital technology adoption and transformation, particularly AM adoption (Centobelli, Cerchione, and Ertz 2020; Iftikhar et al. 2022).”
Guo, H., Shen, Z., Chen, Y., & Dong, M. (2025) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109524 · Cited by 27
Guo, X., Chen, S., & Guo, Y.-M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-04254-0 · Cited by 23
“According to Shashi et al. (2020), bibliometric analysis mitigates bias in data selection through its reliance on quantitative techniques, allowing researchers to prioritize essential and relevant articles.”
Digital technologies and green infrastructure: Advancing a resilient circular supply chain
Agarwal, R., Mehrotra, A., Alofaysan, H., & Mahto, R. V. (2025) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103329 · Cited by 27
Artificial intelligence and policy making; can small municipalities enable digital transformation?
Koliousis, I. G., Al-Surmi, A., & Bashiri, M. (2024) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109324 · Cited by 31
“…that organisations that actively acquire, share, and apply knowledge through coopetitive relationships are better equipped to innovate and adapt to changing market dynamics, resulting in enhanced performance (Centobelli et al., 2020; Lin and Lin, 2023; Liu et al., 2024; Meena et al., 2023).”
BackgroundKorucuk, S., Tırkolaee, E. B., Aytekın, A., Karabašević, D., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2023) · Operations Management Research · doi:10.1007/s12063-023-00360-5 · Cited by 45
Resilient agility under the practice-based view
Lotfi, M., & Sodhi, M. (2022) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2022.2121778 · Cited by 21
Embracing the employee orientation: does customer relationship matter in brand building?
Jhamb, D., Kampani, N., & Arya, V. (2021) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-12-2020-0614 · Cited by 29
Al-Zoubi, L., & Ramayah, T. (2025) · Supply Chain Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-09-2024-0558 · Cited by 28
Nasereddin, A. (2024) · Uncertain Supply Chain Management · doi:10.5267/j.uscm.2023.11.004 · Cited by 19
“Over the past ten years, extensive research has investigated how supply chain operations and digital transformation connect (Centobelli, Cerchione, & Ertz, 2020).”
BackgroundInfluentialLow-carbon business models: Review and typology
Sairanen, M., & Aarikka‐Stenroos, L. (2024) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.10.001 · Cited by 25
Assessing the evolution of banking reputation literature: a bibliometric analysis
Carè, R., Fatima, R., & Lévy, N. (2024) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-07-2023-0417 · Cited by 18
Supply chain flexibility fit and green practices: evidence from the event industry
Yoo, J. J.-E., & Cho, M. (2021) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-09-2020-0999 · Cited by 25
The balancing act: Organizational agility in fast-growing international ventures
Hagen, B., Ghauri, P. N., & Macovei, V. (2024) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.09.007 · Cited by 20
Groening, C., Ngoh, C., & Luchs, R. (2022) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.2319 · Cited by 17
Wu, W., Wang, H., Lu, L., Ma, G., & Gao, X. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0282854 · Cited by 22
Shashi, S., Ertz, M., Cerchione, R., & Kumar, V. (2025) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/jbim-02-2024-0074 · Cited by 23
Self-citationData-Driven FinTech and Agile Supply Chain Systems: Mechanisms and Impacts
Guo, Y.-X., & Wang, W. (2025) · International Review of Economics & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.iref.2025.104253 · Cited by 14
Cui, J. (2024) · Journal of Integrated Social Sciences and Humanities · doi:10.62836/jissh.v1i1.192 · Cited by 14
“To sum up, we know that the there is a linear relationship between digital leadership, organizational digital agility, digital strategy, and digital transformation [32, 33].”
BackgroundTransformation digitale de la supply chain : caractéristiques, enjeux et voies de recherche futures
Abbad, H., Bentahar, O., & Benzidia, S. (2022) · Logistique & Management · doi:10.1080/12507970.2022.2142022 · Cited by 14
Tavana, M., Caprio, D. D., & Rostamkhani, R. (2025) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2024.100633 · Cited by 13
“Shashi et al. (2020) Dynamic business environment and agile SCM. Jana (2021) Analyzing different supply chain structures in lean apparel manufacturing.”
Does lean inventory management alleviate financing constraints?
Wang, J., Yao, X., Zhu, X., & Li, B. (2024) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/jmtm-10-2023-0468 · Cited by 19
Identifying Barriers in the Implementation of Agile Methodologies in Automotive Industry
Soares, D., da Silva, F. J. G., Ramos, S., Kirytopoulos, K., Sá, J., & Ferreira, L. P. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14095453 · Cited by 13
“[47], and the present study also confirms it as a barrier to adopting agile methodologies.”
Determinants of Digitalization in Unorganized Localized Neighborhood Retail Outlets in India
Bhattacharjee, B., Kumar, S., Verma, P., & Maiti, M. (2024) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer19030083 · Cited by 11
“Digital technologies, however, are cost-effective and help to cause low operational costs in the long run [45].”
BackgroundZhu, Z., & Tang, X. (2023) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-03-2022-0092 · Cited by 12
Supanut, A., Maisak, R., & Ratchatakulpat, T. (2024) · Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental · doi:10.24857/rgsa.v18n3-121 · Cited by 11
Digital transformation in SMEs: a literature review on optimizing supply chain management
Kohli, A., & Malik, O. P. (2025) · Journal of Data Information and Management · doi:10.1007/s42488-025-00151-6 · Cited by 9
“The digitalization of supply chains also supports more accurate demand forecasting, risk mitigation, and the development of agile business models that can adapt to market fluctuations (Deiva Ganesh and Kalpana 2022 ; Shashi et al., 2020 ; Zhao et al. 2023 ).”
Tsang, Y.-P., Tang, V., Wu, C.-H., & Li, F. (2024) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.361710 · Cited by 9
Supply chain and logistics in smart cities: A systematic literature review
Chmet, F., Brescia, V., Degregori, G., & Biancone, P. (2024) · Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development · doi:10.24294/jipd.v8i7.5525 · Cited by 9
“The large number of sources justifies a quantitative bibliometric approach to support the analysis as it allows researchers to focus on the topic (Centobelli et al., 2020; Secinaro et al., 2022).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Shashi, Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Ertz, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Naples Federico II (IT)
- Parthenope University of Naples (IT)
- Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Centobelli, Piera
- Venue
- Industrial Marketing Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 90
- Pages
- 324-345
- ISSN
- 0019-8501 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3048809289
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 32.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Industrial Marketing Management (publishedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (Parthenope University of Naples) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Collaboration in agile enterprises
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
- Keywords
- agile supply chain management, digitization, digital transformation, supply chain technology, demand chain management, nomological network, research agenda, supply chain performance, technology adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review