Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 425

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy

Andersen, Thomas Barnebeck·2009·Information Economics and Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.11.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.11.003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Brunetti, 2003, A free press is bad news for corruption, Journal of Public Economics, 87, 1801, 10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00186-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Chinn, 2007, The determinants of the global digital divide: a cross-country analysis of computer and internet penetration, Oxford Economic Papers, 59, 16, 10.1093/oep/gpl024 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ferraz, 2008, Exposing corrupt politicians: the effect of Brazil’s publicly released audits on electoral outcomes, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 703, 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.703 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Forman, 2005, Geographic location and the diffusion of internet technology, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 4, 1, 10.1016/j.elerap.2004.10.005 · DOI
  5. Hall, 1999, Why do some countries produce so much more output than others?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 83, 10.1162/003355399555954 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., Mastruzzi, M., 2007. Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators for 1996–2006. Available online at: <http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/wp-governance.html>. · doi:10.2139/ssrn.718081
  7. Krasker, W., Kuh, E., Welsch, R. 1983. Estimation for dirty data and flawed models. In: Griliches, Z., Intriligator, M.D. (Eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 1, Elsevier (Chapter 11). · DOI
  8. Lau, 2008, Adoption of E-government in three Latin American countries, Telecommunications Policy, 32, 88, 10.1016/j.telpol.2007.07.007 · DOI
  9. Mauro, 1995, Corruption and growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 681, 10.2307/2946696 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Persson, 2003, Electoral rules and corruption, Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 958, 10.1162/154247603322493203 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Reinikka, R., Svensson, J. 2004. The Power of Information: Evidence from a Newspaper Campaign to Reduce Capture. Policy Research Working Paper No. 3239, World Bank. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Rodrik, D., 2008. The New Development Economics: We Shall Experiment, But How Shall We Learn? Mimeo, Harvard University. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Treisman, 2007, What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research?, Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 211, 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.095418 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 425

Metadata

Authors
Andersen, T. B.
Venue
Information Economics and Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
201-210
ISSN
0167-6245 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.11.003
OpenAlex
W2031111227
Cited by
425
References
3
FWCI
35.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.11.003
The paper
Andersen, T. B. (2009). E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy. Information Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.11.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.