The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A teamwork model for understanding an agile team: A case study of a Scrum project
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data
Langley, A. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248 · Cited by 7,008
Developmental sequence in small groups.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0022100 · Cited by 5,778
A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems1
Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249410 · Cited by 5,263
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259182 · Cited by 3,659
What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300303 · Cited by 3,526
Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review
Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006 · Cited by 2,668 · cited 1×
“However, despite the popularity of the method, a systematic review of empirical studies of agile development [16] found only one case study of Scrum in the research literature prior to 2006.”
Self-citationTightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams
Barker, J. R. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393374 · Cited by 2,305
Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork?
Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496405277134 · Cited by 1,930
Cited by
Self-Organizing Roles on Agile Software Development Teams
Hoda, R., Noble, J., & Marshall, S. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2012.30 · Cited by 330
Challenges of shared decision-making: A multiple case study of agile software development
Moe, N. B., Aurum, A., & Dybå, T. (2012) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2011.11.006 · Cited by 205
Self-citationThe daily stand-up meeting: A grounded theory study
Stray, V., Sjøberg, D. I. K., & Dybå, T. (2016) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2016.01.004 · Cited by 139
Self-citationUlfsnes, R., Moe, N. B., Stray, V., & Skarpen, M. (2024) · Generative AI for Effective Software Development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55642-5_10 · Cited by 62
Self-citationSchloegel, U., Stegmann, S., Maedche, A., & van Dick, R. (2016) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2016.07.041 · Cited by 36
Robertson, E. G., Wakefield, C. E., Cohn, R. J., O'Brien, T., Ziegler, D. S., & Fardell, J. E. (2018) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/resprot.9258 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Moe, N. B., Dingsøyr, T., & Dybå, T.
- Venue
- Information and Software Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 480-491
- ISSN
- 0950-5849 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018944916
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 38.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
