Cited by 54Spam and Phishing DetectionImbalanced Data Classification TechniquesMisinformation and Its Impacts

Using Improved Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks to Detect Social Bots on Twitter

Open access
Wu, Bin, Liu, Le, Yang, Yanqing, Zheng, Kangfeng, Wang, Xiujuan·2020·IEEE Access

Abstract

The detection and removal of malicious social bots in social networks has become an area of interest in industry and academia. The widely used bot detection method based on machine learning leads to an imbalance in the number of samples in different categories. Classifier bias leads to a low detection rate of minority samples. Therefore, we propose an improved conditional generative adversarial network (improved CGAN) to extend imbalanced data sets before applying training classifiers to improve the detection accuracy of social bots. To generate an auxiliary condition, we propose a modified clustering algorithm, namely, the Gaussian kernel density peak clustering algorithm (GKDPCA), which avoids the generation of data-augmentation noise and eliminates imbalances between and within social bot class distributions. Furthermore, we improve the CGAN convergence judgment condition by introducing the Wasserstein distance with a gradient penalty, which addresses the model collapse and gradient disappearance in the traditional CGAN. Three common oversampling algorithms are compared in experiments. The effects of the imbalance degree and the expansion ratio of the original data on oversampling are studied, and the improved CGAN performs better than the others. Experimental results comparing with three common oversampling algorithms show that the improved CGAN achieves the higher evaluation scores in terms of F1-score, G-mean and AUC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2020.2975630

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A GAN trained in [33] for creating adversarial examples of social bots improved the training of downstream detectors.

    “A notable example of this kind is represented by the GAN trained in [33] for creating adversarial examples of social bots that improved the training of downstream detectors.”

    From A decade of social bot detection (2020) · cites this paper as [33]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. I. Gulrajani, F. Ahmed, M. Arjovsky, V. Dumoulin, and A. Courville, ''Improved training of wasserstein gans,'' in Proc. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., Dec. 2017, pp. 5767-5777.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • A decade of social bot detection

    Cresci, S. (2020) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3409116 · Cited by 323 · see citing works

    “two networks. Originally, GANs were proposed as a form of generative model – that is, the focus was posed on the generator network. A notable example of this kind is represented by the GAN trained in [33] for creating adversarial examples of social bots that improved the training of downstream detectors. However, with…”
    Background

Authors
Wu, B., Liu, L., Yang, Y., Zheng, K., & Wang, X.
Affiliations
  • Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • Beijing University of Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2020
Volume
8
Pages
36664-36680
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3006859404
Cited by
54
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4
FWCI
8.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2017YFB0802703)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (4202002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
social bot detection, Twitter, conditional generative adversarial networks, data augmentation, class imbalance, model collapse, minority class samples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review