The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Block-DEF: A secure digital evidence framework using blockchain
Abstract
Abstract A secure digital evidence system should ensure that evidence cannot be tampered with and that private information cannot be leaked. Blockchain, a distributed tamper-resistant and privacy-preserving ledger, provides a promising solution for decentralized secure digital evidence systems. However, due to the huge number of digital evidences and the contradiction between the traceability and the privacy of evidence, blockchain faces big data and privacy challenges. To solve the above issues, we propose a secure digital evidence framework using blockchain (Block-DEF) with a loose coupling structure in which the evidence and the evidence information are maintained separately. Only the evidence information is stored in the blockchain, and the evidence is stored on a trusted storage platform. To avoid blockchain bloat, a lightweight blockchain combining a mixed block structure with an optimized name-based practical byzantine fault tolerance consensus mechanism is proposed. To support the traceability and the privacy of evidence, the multi-signature technique is adopted for evidence submission and retrieval. The analytical and experimental results show that Block-DEF is a scalable framework, it guarantees the integrity and validity of evidence, and balances privacy and traceability well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications
Stoica, I., Morris, R., Karger, D., Kaashoek, M. F., & Balakrishnan, H. (2001) · Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications · doi:10.1145/383059.383071 · Cited by 9,623
Practical Byzantine fault tolerance
Castro, M., & Liskov, B. H. (1999) · Operating Systems Design and Implementation · doi:10.5555/296806.296824 · Cited by 3,205
Kademlia: A Peer-to-Peer Information System Based on the XOR Metric
Maymounkov, P., & Mazières, D. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45748-8_5 · Cited by 3,004
Decentralizing Privacy: Using Blockchain to Protect Personal Data
Zyskind, G., Nathan, O., & Pentland, A. '. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops · doi:10.1109/spw.2015.27 · Cited by 2,617
IoT security: Review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges
Khan, M. A., & Salah, K. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.11.022 · Cited by 2,488
Hawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart Contracts
Kosba, A., Miller, A., Shi, E., Wen, Z., & Papamanthou, C. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2016.55 · Cited by 2,227
A Digital Signature Based on a Conventional Encryption Function
Merkle, R. C. (1988) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48184-2_32 · Cited by 1,998
Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications
Stoica, I., Morris, R., Karger, D., Kaashoek, M. F., & Balakrishnan, H. (2001) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/964723.383071 · Cited by 1,923
In search of an understandable consensus algorithm
Ongaro, D., & Ousterhout, J. K. (2014) · Cited by 1,909
A Survey of Information-Centric Networking Research
Xylomenos, G., Ververidis, C. N., Siris, V. A., Fotiou, N., Tsilopoulos, C., Vasilakos, X., Katsaros, K. V., & Polyzos, G. C. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.070813.00063 · Cited by 1,348
Cited by
A Survey on the Internet of Things (IoT) Forensics: Challenges, Approaches, and Open Issues
Stoyanova, M., Nikoloudakis, Y., Panagiotakis, S., Pallis, E., & Markakis, E. K. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2962586 · Cited by 852
A Survey on Access Control in the Age of Internet of Things
Qiu, J., Tian, Z., Du, C., Zuo, Q., Su, S., & Fang, B. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2969326 · Cited by 458
Self-citationFederated learning for secure IoMT-applications in smart healthcare systems: A comprehensive review
Rani, S., Kataria, A., Kumar, S., & Tiwari, P. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110658 · Cited by 228
A systematic literature mapping on secure identity management using blockchain technology
Rathee, T., & Singh, P. (2022) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.03.005 · Cited by 78
A survey on differential privacy for medical data analysis
Liu, W., Zhang, Y., Yang, H., & Meng, Q. (2024) · Annals of Data Science · doi:10.1007/s40745-023-00475-3 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Tian, Z., Li, M., Qiu, M., Sun, Y., & Su, S.
- Venue
- Information Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 491
- Pages
- 151-165
- ISSN
- 0020-0255 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2931991156
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 64.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Block-DEF: A secure digital evidence framework using blockchain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ins.2019.04.011
- The paper
- Tian, Z., Li, M., Qiu, M., Sun, Y., & Su, S. (2019). Block-DEF: A secure digital evidence framework using blockchain. Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.04.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
