Cited by 17Cognitive Abilities and TestingIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesSchool Choice and Performance

Changes over time in the black–white difference on mental tests: Evidence from the children of the 1979 cohort of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth

Murray, Charles·2006·Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intell.2006.07.004

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murray, C.
Affiliations
American Enterprise Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Murray, Charles
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
527-540
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975924713
Cited by
17
References
21
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Michigan
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
Black-White achievement gap, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, family background

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review