Cited by 119Cognitive Abilities and TestingIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesRace, History, and American Society

Black Americans Reduce the Racial IQ Gap: Evidence From Standardization Samples

Dickens, William T., Flynn, James R.·2006·Psychological Science

Abstract

It is often asserted that Black Americans have made no IQ gains on White Americans. Until recently, there have been no adequate data to measure trends in Black IQ. We analyzed data from nine standardization samples for four major tests of cognitive ability. These data suggest that Blacks gained 4 to 7 IQ points on non-Hispanic Whites between 1972 and 2002. Gains have been fairly uniform across the entire range of Black cognitive ability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01802.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Farley R., 1995, State of the union: America in the 1990s
  2. Roid G.H., 2003, Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales (5th ed.), technical manual
  3. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1979). Statistical abstract of the United States, 1979, 100th annual edition . Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  4. Wonderlic. (2006). [Norms by race and age for the Wonderlic Personnel Test N: Normative studies done in 1970, 1983, 1992, and 2001]. Unpublished raw data.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dickens, W. T., & Flynn, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Brookings Institution (US)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Flynn, James R.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2006-10
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
913-920
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2135842529
Cited by
119
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
FWCI
9.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
Keywords
African Americans, IQ trends, cognitive ability, standardization sample, cognitive test scores, racial differences in intelligence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aptitude, Black or African American, Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Male, Psychometrics, Reference Standards, United States, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review