Cited by 37Cognitive Abilities and TestingIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The magnitude and components of change in the black–white IQ difference from 1920 to 1991: A birth cohort analysis of the Woodcock–Johnson standardizations

Murray, Charles·2007·Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intell.2007.02.001

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cattell, 1941, Some theoretical issues in adult intelligence testing, Psychological Bulletin, 38, 592

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murray, C.
Affiliations
American Enterprise Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Murray, Charles
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
305-318
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039254280
Cited by
37
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Justice
  • Woodcock-Muñoz Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
birth cohort analysis, cognitive ability, general intelligence, intelligence test scores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review