Cited by 157Cognitive Abilities and TestingEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sex differences in latent cognitive abilities ages 6 to 59: Evidence from the Woodcock–Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intell.2007.11.001

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 83 references

3 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cizek, 2003, Review of the Woodcock–Johnson III, 1020
  2. Sandoval, 2003, Review of the Woodcock–Johnson III, 1024

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–157 of 157

Metadata

Authors
Keith, T. Z., Reynolds, M. R., Patel, P. G., & Ridley, K. P.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Keith, Timothy Z.
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
502-525
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055351353
Cited by
156
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
sex differences, processing speed, quantitative reasoning, visuospatial ability, general intelligence, developmental changes, children, adolescents and adults, missing data methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review