Cited by 16Psychometric Methodologies and TestingCognitive Abilities and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

Gender differences in figural matrices: The moderating role of item design features

Arendasy, Martin E., Sommer, Markus·2012·Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intell.2012.08.003

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arendasy, M. E., & Sommer, M.
Affiliations
University of Graz (AT)
Corresponding author
Arendasy, Martin E.
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
584-597
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976108583
Cited by
16
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
gender differences, inductive reasoning, fluid intelligence, differential item functioning, test bias, automatic item generation, Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices, measurement bias, latent trait estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review