The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does Chatter Matter? The Impact of User-Generated Content on Music Sales
Open accessAbstract
The Internet has enabled a new era of user-generated content, threatening the hegemony of traditional content generators as the primary sources of “legitimate” information. In this study, we examine the usefulness of such content, consisting of data from blogs and social networking sites, in predicting sales in the music industry. We track changes in online chatter for a sample of 108 albums for four weeks before and after their release dates. We identify the significance of variables on the observation date in predicting future album unit sales one, two, and three weeks ahead. Our findings are that future sales are positively correlated with (a) the volume of blog posts about an album, and (b) traditional factors such as whether the album is released by a major label and reviews from mainstream sources like Rolling Stone. More generally, the study provides some preliminary answers for marketing managers interested in assessing the relative importance of the burgeoning number of “Web 2.0” information metrics that are becoming available on the Internet. The study also provides a framework for thinking about when user-generated content influences decision making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews
Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345 · Cited by 6,003
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.10073 · Cited by 5,916 · cited 1×
“…documented the fact that online users are motivated to write reviews for a number of reasons; in online communities, users often write reviews to increase their influence and status (Hennig-Thurau et al. 2004; Bagozzi and Dholakia 2002) or to provide useful input to other members of the community.”
Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication
Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2004) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0071 · Cited by 2,601
Flow online: lessons learned and future prospects.
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2009) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2008.10.003 · Cited by 954
Online peer and editorial recommendations, trust and choice in virtual markets
Smith, D., Menon, S., & Sivakumar, K. (2005) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20041 · Cited by 683
Probability Models for Customer-Base Analysis
Fader, P. S., & Hardie, B. G. S. (2009) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2008.11.003 · Cited by 204
Cited by
Lamberton, C., & Stephen, A. T. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0415 · Cited by 1,127
How Does Brand-related User-generated Content Differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter?
Smith, A. N., Fischer, E., & Yongjian, C. (2012) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.002 · Cited by 1,044
What We Know and Don't Know about Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature
King, R. A., Racherla, P., & Bush, V. D. (2014) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2014.02.001 · Cited by 1,017
Managing Brands in the Social Media Environment
Gensler, S., Völckner, F., Liu-Thompkins, Y., & Wiertz, C. (2013) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.004 · Cited by 911
Goh, K. Y., Heng, C. S., & Lin, Z. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2048614 · Cited by 799
Metadata
- Authors
- Dhar, V., & Chang, E. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Interactive Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 300-307
- ISSN
- 1094-9968 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6653
- OpenAlex
- W3122522978
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 81.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does Chatter Matter? The Impact of User-Generated Content on Music Sales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.intmar.2009.07.004
- The paper
- Dhar, V., & Chang, E. A. (2009). Does Chatter Matter? The Impact of User-Generated Content on Music Sales. Journal of Interactive Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2009.07.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.