The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Media Metrics — A Framework and Guidelines for Managing Social Media
Open accessAbstract
Social media are becoming ubiquitous and need to be managed like all other forms of media that organizations employ to meet their goals. However, social media are fundamentally different from any traditional or other online media because of their social network structure and egalitarian nature. These differences require a distinct measurement approach as a prerequisite for proper analysis and subsequent management. To develop the right social media metrics and subsequently construct appropriate dashboards, we provide a tool kit consisting of three novel components. First, we theoretically derive and propose a holistic framework that covers the major elements of social media, drawing on theories from marketing, psychology, and sociology. We continue to support and detail these elements — namely ‘motives,’ ‘content,’ ‘network structure,’ and ‘social roles & interactions’ — with recent research studies. Second, based on our theoretical framework, the literature review, and practical experience, we suggest nine guidelines that may prove valuable for designing appropriate social media metrics and constructing a sensible social media dashboard. Third, based on the framework and the guidelines we derive managerial implications and suggest an agenda for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225469 · Cited by 40,491
Kytle, J., & Bandura, A. (1978) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2065952 · Cited by 25,422
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S. S., & Faust, K. (1994) · Cited by 17,962
Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 · Cited by 17,875
Self-citationSocial Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557 · cited 1×
“In the realm of sociology, and in particular social (network) theory and analysis, social networks are social structures made up of a set of social actors (i.e., individuals, groups or organizations) with a complex set of dyadic ties among them (Wasserman and Faust 1994, pp 1–27).”
BackgroundMind, Self, and Society: The Definitive Edition
Mead, G. H., Joas, H., Huebner, D. R., & Morris, C. W. (2015) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226112879.001.0001 · Cited by 11,018
The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited
Granovetter, M. (1983) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.2307/202051 · Cited by 8,263
(2017) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods · doi:10.4135/9781483381411.n575 · Cited by 6,008
Dimensions of Consumer Expertise
Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209080 · Cited by 4,375
(1967) · Cited by 3,831
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Ambler Tim, 2003, Marketing and the Bottom Line
- Batra Rajeev, 1985, Psychological Processes and Advertising Effects, 13
- De Haan Evert, 2013, MSI Working Paper, Report 13–104
- Freeman Linton The Development of Social Network Analysis 2006 Empirical Press Vancouver
- Hoffman Donna L., 2010, MIT Sloan Management Review, 52, 41
- Mead George, 1934, Mind, Self and Society
- Pauwels Koen, 2008, MSI Working Paper, Marketing Science Institute, Report 08-203
- Reibstein David, 2005, Marketing Science Institute Special Report, 85
Cited by
Li, F., Larimo, J., & Leonidou, L. C. (2021) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-020-00733-3 · Cited by 996
Boerman, S. C., Willemsen, L. M., & Van Der Aa, E. P. (2017) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2016.12.002 · Cited by 581
Babić Rosario, A., de Valck, K., & Sotgiu, F. (2020) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00706-1 · Cited by 462
Colicev, A., Malshe, A., Pauwels, K., & O'Connor, P. (2018) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.16.0055 · Cited by 370
Self-citationThe use of Web analytics for digital marketing performance measurement
Järvinen, J., & Karjaluoto, H. (2015) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.04.009 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Peters, K., Chen, Y., Kaplan, A. M., Ognibeni, B., & Pauwels, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Interactive Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 281-298
- ISSN
- 1094-9968 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6653
- OpenAlex
- W2070513048
- Cited by
- 657
- References
- 80
- FWCI
- 110.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Media Metrics — A Framework and Guidelines for Managing Social Media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.007
- The paper
- Peters, K., Chen, Y., Kaplan, A. M., Ognibeni, B., & Pauwels, K. (2013). Social Media Metrics — A Framework and Guidelines for Managing Social Media. Journal of Interactive Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.