Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 657

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Media Metrics — A Framework and Guidelines for Managing Social Media

Open access
Peters, Kay, Chen, Yubo, Kaplan, Andreas M., Ognibeni, Björn, Pauwels, Koen·2013·Journal of Interactive Marketing

Abstract

Social media are becoming ubiquitous and need to be managed like all other forms of media that organizations employ to meet their goals. However, social media are fundamentally different from any traditional or other online media because of their social network structure and egalitarian nature. These differences require a distinct measurement approach as a prerequisite for proper analysis and subsequent management. To develop the right social media metrics and subsequently construct appropriate dashboards, we provide a tool kit consisting of three novel components. First, we theoretically derive and propose a holistic framework that covers the major elements of social media, drawing on theories from marketing, psychology, and sociology. We continue to support and detail these elements — namely ‘motives,’ ‘content,’ ‘network structure,’ and ‘social roles & interactions’ — with recent research studies. Second, based on our theoretical framework, the literature review, and practical experience, we suggest nine guidelines that may prove valuable for designing appropriate social media metrics and constructing a sensible social media dashboard. Third, based on the framework and the guidelines we derive managerial implications and suggest an agenda for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.007

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Ambler Tim, 2003, Marketing and the Bottom Line
  2. Batra Rajeev, 1985, Psychological Processes and Advertising Effects, 13
  3. De Haan Evert, 2013, MSI Working Paper, Report 13–104
  4. Freeman Linton The Development of Social Network Analysis 2006 Empirical Press Vancouver
  5. Hoffman Donna L., 2010, MIT Sloan Management Review, 52, 41
  6. Mead George, 1934, Mind, Self and Society
  7. Pauwels Koen, 2008, MSI Working Paper, Marketing Science Institute, Report 08-203
  8. Reibstein David, 2005, Marketing Science Institute Special Report, 85

Cited by

See all 657

Metadata

Authors
Peters, K., Chen, Y., Kaplan, A. M., Ognibeni, B., & Pauwels, K.
Venue
Journal of Interactive Marketing
Published
2013-11
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
281-298
ISSN
  • 1094-9968 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6653
OpenAlex
W2070513048
Cited by
657
References
80
FWCI
110.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Media Metrics — A Framework and Guidelines for Managing Social Media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.007
The paper
Peters, K., Chen, Y., Kaplan, A. M., Ognibeni, B., & Pauwels, K. (2013). Social Media Metrics — A Framework and Guidelines for Managing Social Media. Journal of Interactive Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.