Cited by 233Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesLanguage Development and Disorders

A Multisite Randomized Controlled Two-Phase Trial of the Early Start Denver Model Compared to Treatment as Usual

Open access
Rogers, Sally J., Estes, Annette, Lord, Catherine, Munson, Jeff, Rocha, Marie, Winter, Jamie, Greenson, Jessica, Colombi, Costanza +6 more·2019·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective This single-blind, randomized, multisite, intent-to-treat study was designed to replicate and extend Dawson et al.'s (Pediatrics. 2010;125: e17-e23) randomized controlled trial testing the effects of the Early Start Denver Model (ESDM), an intensive play- and routines-based intervention delivered in natural settings.Method A randomized controlled trial was conducted at 3 universities. One hundred eighteen children 14 to 24 months old with autism spectrum disorder were enrolled and randomly assigned to ESDM or community interventions for 27 months. Eighty-one children completed the full treatment course and all assessments; data from all 118 children were used in analyses. Children assigned to the ESDM intervention received 3 months of weekly parent coaching followed by 24 months of 15 hour per week (on average) 1:1 treatment weekly on average in homes or daycare settings from supervised therapy assistants while parents received coaching 4 hours monthly from a certified ESDM therapist.Results For the primary analyses, there were time-by-group and time-by-group-by-site interactions for language outcome. In the significant 3-way interaction involving site, 2 sites showed a significant ESDM advantage and the third site showed no significant group differences. In the planned 2-way analysis that pooled data across all 3 sites, there was a significant advantage found for the ESDM group. For the secondary analyses, there were no significant differences between the ESDM and community groups involving developmental quotient, autism severity, or adaptive behavior. The treatment effect of group on language outcomes was not moderated by baseline developmental quotient, autism severity, or language.Conclusion Results of the primary analysis provide a partial replication of Dawson et al.'s 2010 language findings.Clinical trial registration information Intensive Intervention for Toddlers with Autism; https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT00698997.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.01.004

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial studies suggest moderate benefits of generic interventions targeting co-occurring emotional and behavioural problems adapted for youths with ASD.

    “Increasingly, more generic interventions that target co-occurring emotional and behavioural problems are being adapted for youths with ASD, and initial studies suggest moderate benefits 189 .”

    From Autism spectrum disorder (2020) · cites this paper as [189]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports language benefits from the Early Start Denver Model for young children with ASD, not benefits from generic interventions adapted to treat co-occurring emotional or behavioural problems in youths. Searches for those problems and for moderate benefits found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Sparrow SS, Cicchetti DV, Balla DA. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (Vineland-II). 2nd ed. 2005, San Antonio, TX: Pearson.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogers, S. J., Estes, A., Lord, C., Munson, J., Rocha, M., Winter, J., Greenson, J., Colombi, C., Dawson, G., Vismara, L. A., Sugar, C. A., Hellemann, G., Whelan, F., & Talbott, M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Rogers, Sally J.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
58
Issue
9
Pages
853-865
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913192595
Cited by
233
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 9
FWCI
20.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH081757)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
Early Start Denver Model, autism spectrum disorder, toddlers, language outcomes, parent coaching, intensive intervention, community-based intervention, replication, developmental quotient, adaptive behavior, autism severity, naturalistic intervention
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child, Preschool, Family Therapy, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Models, Psychological, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Risk, Time Factors, United States, Early Intervention, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review