Cited by 149Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionCardiovascular Effects of Exercise

Cardiac computed tomography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for risk stratification in asymptomatic individuals without known cardiovascular disease: a position statement of the Working Group on Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology

Open access
Perrone-Filardi, Pasquale, Achenbach, Stephan, Möhlenkamp, Stefan, Reiner, Zeljko, Sambuceti, Gianmario, Schuijf, Joanne D., Van der Wall, Ernst, Kaufmann, Philip A. +3 more·2011·European Heart Journal

Abstract

Cardiovascular events remain one of the most frequent causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. The majority of cardiac events occur in individuals without known coronary artery disease (CAD) and in low- to intermediate-risk subjects. Thus, the development of improved preventive strategies may substantially benefit from the identification, among apparently intermediate-risk subjects, of those who have a high probability for developing future cardiac events. Cardiac computed tomography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) by single photon emission computed tomography may play a role in this setting. In fact, absence of coronary calcium in cardiac computed tomography and inducible ischaemia in MPS are associated with a very low rate of major cardiac events in the next 3–5 years. Based on current evidence, the evaluation of coronary calcium in primary prevention subjects should be considered in patients classified as intermediate-risk based on traditional risk factors, since high calcium scores identify subjects at high-risk who may benefit from aggressive secondary prevention strategies. In addition, calcium scoring should be considered for asymptomatic type 2 diabetic patients without known CAD to select those in whom further functional testing by MPS or other stress imaging techniques may be considered to identify patients with significant inducible ischaemia. From available data, the use of MPS as first line testing modality for risk stratification is not recommended in any category of primary prevention subjects with the possible exception of first-degree relatives of patients with premature CAD in whom MPS may be considered. However, the Working Group recognizes that neither the use of computed tomography for calcium imaging nor of MPS have been proven to significantly improve clinical outcomes of primary prevention subjects in prospective controlled studies. This information would be crucial to adequately define the role of imaging approaches in cardiovascular preventive strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq235

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Hoff JA, Chomka EV, Krainik AJ, Daviglus M, Rich S, Kondos GT. Age and gender distribution of coronary artery calcium detected by electron beam tomography. Am J Cardiol 2001;87:1335 -1339.
  2. Erbel R, Mo ¨hlenkamp S, Lehmann N, Schmermund A, Roggenbuck U, Moebus S, Nico Dragano N, Ka ¨lsch H, Hoffmann B, Stang A, Broecker-Preuss M, Gro ¨nemeyer D, Seibel R, Mann K, Jo ¨ckeet KH. Net reclassification improvement is particularly high when coronary artery calcium scoring is focused on intermedi- ate risk subjects: The Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study. Circulation 2009;120:S425.
  3. American Diabetes Association. Standard of medical care in diabetes-2007. Diabetes Care 2007;30:S1-S41.
  4. Houslay ES, Cowell SJ, Prescott RJ, Reid J, Burton J, Northridge DB, Boon NA, Newby DE, on behalf of Scottish Aortic Stenosis, Lipid Lowering Therapy. Impact on regression (SALTIRE) trial Investigators. Heart 2006;92:1207 -1212.
  5. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, Poon M, Hendel RC, Carr JC, Gerstad NA, Gillam LD, Hodgson JM, Kim RJ, Kramer CM, Lesser JR, Martin ET, Messer JV, Redberg RF, Rubin GD, Rumsfeld JS, Taylor AJ, Weigold WG, Woodard PK, Brindis RG, Hendel RC, Douglas PS, Peterson ED, Wolk MJ, Allen JM, Patel MR. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriate- ness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Stra- tegic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angio- graphy and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1475 -1497.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perrone-Filardi, P., Achenbach, S., Möhlenkamp, S., Reiner, Z., Sambuceti, G., Schuijf, J. D., Van der Wall, E., Kaufmann, P. A., Knuuti, J., Schroeder, S., & Zellweger, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Federico II University of Naples 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Sciences and Immunology , , Via Pansini, 5, 80131, Napoli ,
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen (DE)
  • University Hospital Centre Zagreb 4 Department of Internal Medicine , ,
  • University of Genoa (IT)
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Leiden University Medical Centre 6 Department of Cardiology , , Leiden ,
  • University Hospital Zurich 7 Cardiovascular Centre, Nuclear Cardiology, Cardiac Imaging , ,
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • Klinik am Eichert 9 Department of Cardiology , , Goeppingen ,
  • University Hospital of Basel (CH)
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2010-07-14
Volume
32
Issue
16
Pages
1986-1993
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2110141547
Cited by
149
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
15.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Keywords
risk stratification, asymptomatic individuals, primary prevention, coronary artery disease, cardiac CT, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, coronary artery calcium score, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular events, secondary prevention
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Calcinosis, Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Angiopathies, Humans, Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II, Kidney Diseases, Pedigree, Prognosis, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Disease Progression, Risk Assessment, Early Diagnosis, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review