Cited by 566Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

J-Point Elevation in Survivors of Primary Ventricular Fibrillation and Matched Control Subjects

Open access
Rosso, Raphael, Kogan, Evgeni, Belhassen, Bernard, Rozovski, Uri, Scheinman, Melvin M., Zeltser, David, Halkin, Amir, Steinvil, Arie +4 more·2008·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine whether J-point elevation is a marker of arrhythmic risk.Background J-point elevation has been considered an innocent finding among healthy young individuals (the "early repolarization" pattern). However, this electrocardiogram (ECG) finding is increasingly being associated with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (VF).Methods In a case-control study, the ECG of 45 patients with idiopathic VF were compared with those of 124 age- and gender-matched control subjects and with those of 121 young athletes. We measured the height of J-point and ST-segment elevation and counted the presence of slurring in the terminal portion of the R-wave.Results J-point elevation was more common among patients with idiopathic VF than among matched control subjects (42% vs. 13%, p = 0.001). This was true for J-point elevation in the inferior leads (27% vs. 8%, p = 0.006) and for J-point elevation in leads I to aVL (13% vs. 1%, p = 0.009). J-point elevation in V(4) to V(6) occurred with equal frequency among patients and matched control subjects (6.7% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.86). Male subjects had J-point elevation more often than female subjects and young athletes had J-point elevation more often than healthy adults but less often than patients with idiopathic VF. The presence of ST-segment elevation or QRS slurring did not add diagnostic value to the presence of J-point elevation.Conclusions J-point elevation is found more frequently among patients with idiopathic VF than among healthy control subjects. The frequency of J-point elevation among young athletes is intermediate (higher than among healthy adults but lower than among patients with idiopathic VF).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.010

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early repolarization ECG pattern (>1 mm) in the inferior/lateral leads occurs in 1% to 13% of the general population.

    “Early repolarization ECG pattern (>1 mm) in the inferior/lateral leads occurs in 1% to 13% of the general population and in 15% to 70% of idiopathic VF cases (352–354).”

    From 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope (2017) · cites this paper as [353]

    Table 1 reports J-point elevation in healthy matched controls, including 13.0% with any elevation in any lead. But with the claimed >1 mm threshold, the figure is 8.9% in any lead, and the study’s matched controls are not a general-population sample. The cited 1%–13% range therefore does not establish the claim as qualified. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Early repolarization pattern is associated with increased risk of cardiac death in population-based studies.

    “Furthermore, it has been shown in population-based studies to be associated with increased risk of cardiac death (352,353,355–357).”

    From 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope (2017) · cites this paper as [353]

    The Discussion reports that J-point elevation was more frequent in patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation than in matched healthy controls. This was a case-control study, not a population-based study of cardiac death. The Study limitations section also cautions that an incidental J-wave found during screening should not be interpreted as a marker of increased risk. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The presence of a J wave increases the risk of VF from 3.4/100,000 to 11.0/100,000.

    “One study showed that the presence of a J wave increased the risk of VF from 3.4/100,000 to 11.0/100,000 (353).”

    From 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope (2017) · cites this paper as [353]

    The “Diagnostic power of J-point elevation” section gives the stated increase from 3.4 to 11 per 100,000, but specifically for the probability of idiopathic VF in a person aged 35–45 with a J wave. The citing sentence omits those limits and describes the figure as the risk of VF generally. The “Study limitations” section also cautions against interpreting an incidental J wave as a marker of increased risk. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Early repolarization ECG pattern (>1 mm) in the inferior/lateral leads occurs in 15% to 70% of idiopathic VF cases.

    “Early repolarization ECG pattern (>1 mm) in the inferior/lateral leads occurs in 1% to 13% of the general population and in 15% to 70% of idiopathic VF cases (352–354).”
  • The J-point ST elevation (early repolarization) pattern may become a marker of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation.

    “and may thus become a marker of this life-threatening condition.”

    From The Year of 2008 in Electrocardiology (2010) · cites this paper as [5]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosso, R., Kogan, E., Belhassen, B., Rozovski, U., Scheinman, M. M., Zeltser, D., Halkin, A., Steinvil, A., Heller, K., Glikson, M., Katz, A., & Viskin, S.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Corresponding author
Viskin, Sami
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
52
Issue
15
Pages
1231-1238
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W71601869
Cited by
566
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 61
FWCI
22.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Keywords
J-point elevation, idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, early repolarization, arrhythmia risk, electrocardiographic markers, youth athletes, ST-segment elevation, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sports, Ventricular Fibrillation, Tachycardia, Ventricular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review