Cited by 417Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation by Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibition

Open access
Schneider, Markus P., Hua, Tsushung A., Böhm, Michael, Wachtell, Kristian, Kjeldsen, Sverre E., Schmieder, Roland E.·2010·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The authors reviewed published clinical trial data on the effects of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition for the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF), aiming to define when RAS inhibition is most effective.Background Individual studies examining the effects of RAS inhibition on AF prevention have reported controversial results.Methods All published randomized controlled trials reporting the effects of treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in the primary or secondary prevention of AF were included.Results A total of 23 randomized controlled trials with 87,048 patients were analyzed. In primary prevention, 6 trials in hypertension, 2 trials in myocardial infarction, and 3 trials in heart failure were included (some being post-hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials). In secondary prevention, 8 trials after cardioversion and 4 trials assessing the medical prevention of recurrence were included. Overall, RAS inhibition reduced the odds ratio for AF by 33% (p < 0.00001), but there was substantial heterogeneity among trials. In primary prevention, RAS inhibition was effective in patients with heart failure and those with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy but not in post-myocardial infarction patients overall. In secondary prevention, RAS inhibition was often administered in addition to antiarrhythmic drugs, including amiodarone, further reducing the odds for AF recurrence after cardioversion by 45% (p = 0.01) and in patients on medical therapy by 63% (p < 0.00001).Conclusions This analysis supports the concept of RAS inhibition as an emerging treatment for the primary and secondary prevention of AF but acknowledges the fact that some of the primary prevention trials were post-hoc analyses. Further areas of uncertainty include potential differences among specific RAS inhibitors and possible interactions or synergistic effects with antiarrhythmic drugs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.043

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wachtell K. Atrial fibrillation, maybe it is not so lone? J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:30 -1.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schneider, M. P., Hua, T. A., Böhm, M., Wachtell, K., Kjeldsen, S. E., & Schmieder, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • Saarland University (DE)
  • Rigshospitalet (DK)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Schmieder, Roland E.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
55
Issue
21
Pages
2299-2307
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W8133324
Cited by
417
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 41
FWCI
31.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KFO 196)
  • DFG
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme
  • Novartis
  • Takeda
  • AstraZeneca
  • Boehringer Ingelheim
  • Roche
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, renin-angiotensin system blockade, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, atrial fibrillation prevention, primary prevention, secondary prevention, heart failure, hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial infarction, cardioversion, antiarrhythmic drugs, amiodarone, atrial fibrillation recurrence
MeSH terms
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Animals, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Primary Prevention, Prognosis, Renin-Angiotensin System, Severity of Illness Index, Survival Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review