Cited by 192Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Lack of evidence of increased mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation taking digoxin: findings from post hoc propensity-matched analysis of the AFFIRM trial

Open access
Gheorghiade, M., Fonarow, G. C., van Veldhuisen, D. J., Cleland, J. G. F., Butler, J., Epstein, A. E., Patel, K., Aban, I. B. +3 more·2013·European Heart Journal

Abstract

AIMS: Digoxin is recommended for long-term rate control in paroxysmal, persistent, and permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). While some analyses suggest an association of digoxin with a higher mortality in AF, the intrinsic nature of this association has not been examined in propensity-matched cohorts, which is the objective of the current study. METHODS AND RESULTS: In Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM), 4060 patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF were randomized to rate (n = 2027) vs. rhythm (n = 2033) control strategies. Of these, 1377 received digoxin as initial therapy and 1329 received no digoxin at baseline. Propensity scores for digoxin use were estimated for each of these 2706 patients and used to assemble a cohort of 878 pairs of patients receiving and not receiving digoxin, who were balanced on 59 baseline characteristics. Matched patients had a mean age of 70 years, 40% were women, and 11% non-white. During the 3.4 years of the mean follow-up, all-cause mortality occurred in 14 and 13% of matched patients receiving and not receiving digoxin, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) associated with digoxin use: 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-1.37; P = 0.640]. Among matched patients, digoxin had no association with all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.85-1.09; P = 0.510) or incident non-fatal cardiac arrhythmias (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.37-2.23; P = 0.827). Digoxin had no multivariable-adjusted or propensity score-adjusted associations with these outcomes in the pre-match cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF, we found no evidence of increased mortality or hospitalization in those taking digoxin as baseline initial therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurheartj/eht120

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association between digoxin use and excess mortality in AF patients is likely due to selection and prescription biases rather than harm caused by digoxin, particularly as digoxin is commonly prescribed to sicker patients.

    “Observational studies have associated digoxin use with excess mortality in AF patients, [547][548][549] but this association is likely due to selection and prescription biases rather than harm caused by digoxin, [550][551][552][553] particularly as digoxin is commonly prescribed to sicker patients.225”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cleland JG, Cullington D. Digoxin: quo vadis? Circ Heart Fail 2009;2:81 -85.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gheorghiade, M., Fonarow, G. C., van Veldhuisen, D. J., Cleland, J. G. F., Butler, J., Epstein, A. E., Patel, K., Aban, I. B., Aronow, W. S., Anker, S. D., & Ahmed, A.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Hull York Medical School (GB)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • New York Medical College (US)
  • Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
Corresponding author
Ahmed, A.
Venue
European Heart Journal
Published
2013-04-16
Volume
34
Issue
20
Pages
1489-1497
ISSN
  • 0195-668X (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-9645
OpenAlex
W2128605957
Cited by
192
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 14
FWCI
21.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Touro Scholar (Touro College) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0611-10227)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01-HL085561-S, R01HL097047, R01HL085561)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
digoxin, atrial fibrillation, all-cause mortality, hospitalization, cardiac arrhythmias, rate control, rhythm control, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, persistent atrial fibrillation, AFFIRM trial, propensity score matching
MeSH terms
Aged, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Cause of Death, Digoxin, Female, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Treatment Outcome, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Propensity Score

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review