Cited by 122Cardiac Health and Mental HealthHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Worsening depressive symptoms are associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure

Open access
Sherwood, Andrew, Blumenthal, James A., Hinderliter, Alan L., Koch, Gary G., Adams, Kirkwood F., Dupree, Carla Sueta, Bensimhon, Daniel R., Johnson, Kristy S. +4 more·2011·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of changes in symptoms of depression over a 1-year period on subsequent clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients.Background Emerging evidence shows that clinical depression, which is prevalent among patients with HF, is associated with a poor prognosis. However, it is uncertain how changes in depression symptoms over time may relate to clinical outcomes.Methods One-hundred forty-seven HF outpatients with ejection fraction of less than 40% were assessed for depressive symptoms using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at baseline and again 1 year later. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, controlling for established risk factors, were used to evaluate how changes in depressive symptoms were related to a combined primary end point of death or cardiovascular hospitalization over a median follow-up period of 5 years (with a range of 4 to 7 years and no losses to follow-up).Results The 1-year change in symptoms of depression, as indicated by higher BDI scores over a 1-year interval (1-point BDI change hazard ratio [HR]: 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02 to 1.12, p = 0.007), was associated with death or cardiovascular hospitalization after controlling for baseline depression (baseline BDI HR: 1.1, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.14, p < 0.001) and established risk factors, including HF cause, age, ejection fraction, plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level, and prior hospitalizations.Conclusions Worsening symptoms of depression are associated with a poorer prognosis in HF patients. Routine assessment of symptoms of depression in HF patients may help to guide appropriate medical management of these patients who are at increased risk for adverse clinical outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.031

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Worsening depression over a year is a bad omen, hinting that regular monitoring could allow early intervention with the aim of improving outcomes.

    “Worsening depression over a year is also a bad omen, hinting that regular monitoring could allow early intervention with the aim of improving outcomes. 100”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherwood, A., Blumenthal, J. A., Hinderliter, A. L., Koch, G. G., Adams, K. F., Dupree, C. S., Bensimhon, D. R., Johnson, K. S., Trivedi, R., Bowers, M., Christenson, R. H., & O'Connor, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Cardiovascular Research Foundation (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Sherwood, Andrew
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
418-423
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029552522
Cited by
122
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 20
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  • National Center for Research Resources
  • National Institutes of Health (M01-RR-30)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
heart failure, depression, depressive symptoms, prognosis, mortality, cardiovascular hospitalization, Beck Depression Inventory, symptom change over time, ejection fraction, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, depression screening
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiac Output, Cause of Death, Depression, Female, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Regression Analysis, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Survival Analysis, Hospital Mortality, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Sickness Impact Profile, Disease Progression, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review