Cited by 56Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Prevalent and incident heart failure in cardiovascular outcome trials of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Open access
Greene, Stephen J., Vaduganathan, Muthiah, Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb, Bakris, George L., Weir, Matthew R., Seltzer, Jonathan H., Sattar, Naveed, McGuire, Darren K. +3 more·2018·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Despite multiple examples of glucose-lowering therapies affecting heart failure (HF) risk, ascertainment of HF data in cardiovascular outcome trials of these medications has not been systematically characterized. In this review, large (n >1,000) published phase III and IV cardiovascular outcome trials evaluating glucose-lowering therapies through June 2017 were identified. Data were abstracted from publications, U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory committee records, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration labeling documents. Overall, 21 trials including 152,737 patients were evaluated. Rates and definitions of baseline HF and incident HF were inconsistently provided. Baseline ejection fraction data were provided in 3 studies but not specific to patients with HF. No trial reported functional class, ejection fraction, or HF therapy at the time of incident HF diagnosis. HF hospitalization data were available in 15 trials, but only 2 included HF-related events within the primary composite endpoint. This systematic review highlights gaps in HF data capture within cardiovascular outcome trials of glucose-lowering therapies and outlines rationale and strategies for improving HF characterization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.047

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [47]Scirica BM Braunwald E Raz I Heart Failure, Saxagliptin, and Diabetes Mellitus: Observations from the SAVOR-TIMI 53 Randomized Trial Circulation 2015 132 e198 26459088
  2. [50]Butler J Hamo CE Filippatos G The potential role and rationale for treatment of heart failure with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors Eur J Heart Fail 2017 28836359

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greene, S. J., Vaduganathan, M., Khan, M. S., Bakris, G. L., Weir, M. R., Seltzer, J. H., Sattar, N., McGuire, D. K., Januzzi, J. L., Stockbridge, N., & Butler, J.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Butler, Javed
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
71
Issue
12
Pages
1379-1390
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790767749
Cited by
56
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 5
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • Singulex
  • European Commission
  • Eisai
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Akebia Therapeutics
  • Esperion Therapeutics
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32hl069749-20, T32 HL069749)
  • Relypsa
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32-HL069749, T32HL069749-14, U10HL110302, T32HL007604)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM115428)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092949)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
heart failure, type 2 diabetes, glucose-lowering therapy, cardiovascular outcome trials, heart failure hospitalization, heart failure incidence, heart failure prevalence, ejection fraction, heart failure functional class, heart failure treatment, drug labeling
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Heart Failure, Humans, Incidence, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review