Cited by 404ECG Monitoring and AnalysisCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detection of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Using a Convolutional Neural Network-Enabled Electrocardiogram

Open access

Abstract

Background Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an uncommon but important cause of sudden cardiac death. Objectives This study sought to develop an artificial intelligence approach for the detection of HCM based on 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG). Methods A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained and validated using digital 12-lead ECG from 2,448 patients with a verified HCM diagnosis and 51,153 non-HCM age- and sex-matched control subjects. The ability of the CNN to detect HCM was then tested on a different dataset of 612 HCM and 12,788 control subjects. Results In the combined datasets, mean age was 54.8 ± 15.9 years for the HCM group and 57.5 ± 15.5 years for the control group. After training and validation, the area under the curve (AUC) of the CNN in the validation dataset was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94 to 0.97) at the optimal probability threshold of 11% for having HCM. When applying this probability threshold to the testing dataset, the CNN's AUC was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.95 to 0.96) with sensitivity 87% and specificity 90%. In subgroup analyses, the AUC was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.94 to 0.97) among patients with left ventricular hypertrophy by ECG criteria and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90 to 1.00) among patients with a normal ECG. The model performed particularly well in younger patients (sensitivity 95%, specificity 92%). In patients with HCM with and without sarcomeric mutations, the model-derived median probabilities for having HCM were 97% and 96%, respectively. Conclusions ECG-based detection of HCM by an artificial intelligence algorithm can be achieved with high diagnostic performance, particularly in younger patients. This model requires further refinement and external validation, but it may hold promise for HCM screening.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.030

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 30 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–106 of 106

Metadata

Authors
Ko, W.-Y., Siontis, K. C., Attia, Z. I., Carter, R. E., Kapa, S., Ommen, S. R., Demuth, S. J., Ackerman, M. J., Gersh, B. J., Arruda-Olson, A. M., Geske, J. B., Asirvatham, S. J., Lopez-Jimenez, F., Nishimura, R. A., Friedman, P. A., & Noseworthy, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Noseworthy, Peter A.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
75
Issue
7
Pages
722-733
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008117014
Cited by
404
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 17
FWCI
27.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K01HL124045)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, electrocardiogram, convolutional neural networks, artificial intelligence, automated disease detection, left ventricular hypertrophy, sarcomeric mutations, sudden cardiac death, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Cardiovascular, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review