Cited by 31ECG Monitoring and AnalysisPotassium and Related DisordersNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Serum Potassium Monitoring Using AI-Enabled Smartwatch Electrocardiograms

Open access
Chiu, I-Min, Wu, Po-Jung, Zhang, Huan, Hughes, J. Weston, Rogers, Albert J., Jalilian, Laleh, Perez, Marco, Lin, Chun-Hung Richard +3 more·2024·JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology

Abstract

Background Hyperkalemia, characterized by elevated serum potassium levels, heightens the risk of sudden cardiac death, particularly increasing risk for individuals with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Traditional laboratory test monitoring is resource-heavy, invasive, and unable to provide continuous tracking. Wearable technologies like smartwatches with electrocardiogram (ECG) capabilities are emerging as valuable tools for remote monitoring, potentially allowing for personalized monitoring with artificial intelligence (AI)-ECG interpretation.Objectives The purpose of this study was to develop an AI-ECG algorithm to predict serum potassium level in ESRD patients with smartwatch-generated ECG waveforms.Methods A cohort of 152,508 patients with 293,557 ECGs paired serum potassium levels obtained within 1 hour at Cedars Sinai Medical Center was used to train an AI-ECG model ("Kardio-Net") to predict serum potassium level. The model was further fine-tuned on 4,337 ECGs from 1,463 patients with ESRD using inputs from 12- and single-lead ECGs. Kardio-Net was evaluated in held-out test cohorts from Cedars Sinai Medical Center and Stanford Healthcare (SHC) as well as a prospective international cohort of 40 ESRD patients with smartwatch ECGs at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.Results The Kardio-Net, when applied to 12-lead ECGs, identified severe hyperkalemia (>6.5 mEq/L) with an AUC of 0.852 (95% CI: 0.745-0.956) and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.527 mEq/L. In external validation at SHC, the model achieved an AUC of 0.849 (95% CI: 0.823-0.875) and an MAE of 0.599 mEq/L. For single-lead ECGs, Kardio-Net detected severe hyperkalemia with an AUC of 0.876 (95% CI: 0.765-0.987) in the primary cohort and had an MAE of 0.575 mEq/L. In the external SHC validation, the AUC was 0.807 (95% CI: 0.778-0.835) with an MAE of 0.740 mEq/L. Using prospectively obtained smartwatch data, the AUC was 0.831 (95% CI: 0.693-0.975), with an MAE of 0.580 mEq/L.Conclusions We validate a deep learning model to predict serum potassium levels from both 12-lead ECGs and single-lead smartwatch data, demonstrating its utility for remote monitoring of hyperkalemia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.07.023

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiu, I.-M., Wu, P.-J., Zhang, H., Hughes, J. W., Rogers, A. J., Jalilian, L., Perez, M., Lin, C.-H. R., Lee, C.-T., Zou, J., & Ouyang, D.
Affiliations
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW)
  • National Sun Yat-sen University (TW)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
10
Issue
12
Pages
2644-2654
ISSN
2405-500X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403271828
Cited by
31
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 1
FWCI
9.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JACC. Clinical electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NIH
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Potassium and Related Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
hyperkalemia, wearable ECG, end-stage renal disease, chronic kidney disease, remote patient monitoring, single-lead ECG, sudden cardiac death risk, external validation, hospital readmission prediction
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Hyperkalemia, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Middle Aged, Potassium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review