Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantifying the proportion of severe asthma exacerbations attributable to inhaled corticosteroid nonadherence

Open access
Williams, L. Keoki, Peterson, Edward L., Wells, Karen, Ahmedani, Brian K., Kumar, Rajesh, Burchard, Esteban G., Chowdhry, Vimal K., Favro, David, Lanfear, David E., Pladevall, Manel·2011·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Background Asthma is an inflammatory condition often punctuated by episodic symptomatic worsening, and accordingly, individuals with asthma may have waxing and waning adherence to controller therapy. Objective To measure changes in inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) adherence over time, and to estimate the effect of this changing pattern of use on asthma exacerbations. Methods ICS adherence was estimated from electronic prescription and fill information for 298 participants in the Study of Asthma Phenotypes and Pharmacogenomic Interactions by Race-ethnicity (SAPPHIRE). For each individual we calculated a moving average of ICS adherence for each day of follow-up. Asthma exacerbations were defined as the need for oral corticosteroids, an asthma-related emergency department visit, or an asthma-related hospitalization. Proportional hazard models were used to assess the relationship between ICS medication adherence and asthma exacerbations. Results Adherence to ICS medications began to increase prior to the first asthma exacerbation and continued afterward. Adherence was associated with a reduction in exacerbations, but was only statistically significant among individuals whose adherence was >75% of the prescribed dose (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41–0.90) when compared with individuals whose adherence was ≤25%. This pattern was largely confined to individuals whose asthma was not well controlled initially. An estimated 24% of asthma exacerbations were attributable to ICS medication non-adherence. Conclusions Inhaled corticosteroid adherence varies in the time period leading up to and following an asthma exacerbation, and non-adherence likely contributes to a large number of these exacerbations. High levels of adherence are likely required to prevent these events. [ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01142947]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.09.011

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Williams, L. K., Peterson, E. L., Wells, K., Ahmedani, B. K., Kumar, R., Burchard, E. G., Chowdhry, V. K., Favro, D., Lanfear, D. E., & Pladevall, M.
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
128
Issue
6
Pages
1185-1191.e2
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062940257
Cited by
347
References
42
FWCI
19.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying the proportion of severe asthma exacerbations attributable to inhaled corticosteroid nonadherence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jaci.2011.09.011
The paper
Williams, L. K., Peterson, E. L., Wells, K., Ahmedani, B. K., Kumar, R., Burchard, E. G., Chowdhry, V. K., Favro, D., Lanfear, D. E., & Pladevall, M. (2011). Quantifying the proportion of severe asthma exacerbations attributable to inhaled corticosteroid nonadherence. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2011.09.011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.