CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 334Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk factors for the incidence and persistence of suicide-related outcomes: A 10-year follow-up study using the National Comorbidity Surveys

Open access
Borges, Guilherme, Angst, Jules, Nock, Matthew K., Ruscio, Ayelet Meron, Kessler, Ronald C.·2008·Journal of Affective Disorders
DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2007.01.036PMC PMC2248274
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background We report prospective associations of baseline risk factors with the first onset and persistence of suicide-related outcomes (SROs; ideation, plans, gestures, and attempts) over a 10-year interval among respondents who participated in both the 1990-02 National Comorbidity Survey (NCS) and the 2000-02 National Comorbidity Survey follow-up (NCS-2).Methods A total of 5001 NCS respondents were re-interviewed (87.6% of baseline sample) in the NCS-2. Three sets of baseline (NCS) risk factors were considered as predictors of the first onset and persistence of SROs: socio-demographics, lifetime DSM-III-R disorders, and SROs.Results New onsets included 6.2% suicide ideation, 2.3% plan, 0.7% gesture, and 0.9% attempts. More than one-third of respondents with a baseline history of suicide ideation continued to have suicide ideation at some time over the intervening decade. Persistence was lower for other SROs. The strongest predictors of later SROs were baseline SROs. Prospective associations of baseline mental disorders with later SROs were largely limited to the onset and persistence of ideation.Limitations Although data were gathered prospectively, they were based on retrospective reports at both baseline and follow-up.Conclusions Baseline history of SROs explained much of the association of mental disorders with later SROs. It is important clinically to note that many of the risk factors known to predict onset of SROs also predict persistence of SROs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2007.01.036

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–333 of 333

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Borges, G., Angst, J., Nock, M. K., Ruscio, A. M., & Kessler, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (MX)
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Kessler, Ronald C.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
105
Issue
1-3
Pages
25-33
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jad.2007.01.036
PMC
PMC2248274
OpenAlex
W2136828172
Cited by
334
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 25
FWCI
10.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (044780)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U01-MH60220)
  • John W. Alden Trust
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA12058)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
suicidal ideation, suicide planning, suicide attempts, risk factors, mental illness, lifetime psychiatric disorders, National Comorbidity Survey, prospective follow-up
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Demography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, Time Factors, United States, Comorbidity, Incidence, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review