Cited by 67Mental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Long term outcome of primary care depression

Open access
Yiend, Jenny, Paykel, Eugene, Merritt, Rowena, Lester, Kathryn, Doll, Helen, Burns, Tom·2009·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

We conducted a follow up over 23 years of depressed patients originally presenting to general practice in 1981 and studied in detail at that time. Aims were to assess the long term course and outcome of depression in primary care. Patterns of recovery and recurrence of major depressive episodes, together with other aspects of course, treatment and current state, were assessed at interview. 78% (129) of the original sample were traced to current general practice and outcome data obtained on 54. One third had a prior history of depression. Interview data were obtained on 37 patients. Time to recovery from baseline averaged 10.3 months. The recurrence rate was 64% (23). Most participants suffered at least 2 further episodes that were frequently chronic lasting 2 years on average. Time before first recurrence appeared considerably longer than in comparable psychiatric inpatient samples. No participants were continuously ill. Although loss to follow up limits our conclusions, the course of primary care depression appears worse than suggested by previous, shorter follow ups. Our data suggest that long term risk of a recurrence may be high, but with recurrence delayed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.026

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yiend, J., Paykel, E., Merritt, R., Lester, K., Doll, H., & Burns, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Yiend, Jenny
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
118
Issue
1-3
Pages
79-86
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039788339
Cited by
67
References
8
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
depression, long-term outcomes, primary care, general practice, recurrence, chronic depression, recovery time, major depressive episode, follow-up
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Chronic Disease, Combined Modality Therapy, Counseling, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, London, Long-Term Care, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Primary Health Care, Recurrence, Referral and Consultation, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review