Cited by 480Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Client Socio-Demographic and Service Receipt Inventory – European Version: development of an instrument for international research: EPSILON Study 5

Open access
Chisholm, D., Knapp, M. R. J., Knudsen, H. C., Amaddeo, F., Gaite, L., van Wijngaarden, B., EPSILON Study Group·2000·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Cross-cultural comparison of mental health service utilisation and costs is complicated by the heterogeneity of service systems. For data to be locally meaningful yet internationally comparable, a carefully constructed approach to its collection is required. Aims: To develop a research method and instrument for the collection of data on the service utilisation and related characteristics of people with mental disorders, as the basis for calculating the costs of care. Method: Various approaches to the collection of service use data and key stages of instrument development were identified in order to select the most appropriate methods. Results: Based on previous work, and following translation and cross-cultural validation, an instrument was developed: the Client Socio-Demographic and Service Receipt Inventory – European Version (CSSRI–EU). This was subsequently administered to 404 people with schizophrenia across five countries. Conclusion: The CSSRI – EU provides a standardised yet adaptable method for collating service receipt and associated data alongside assessment of patient outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.177.39.s28

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Becker, T., Knapp, M. R. J., Knudsen, H. C., Becker, T., Knapp, M. R. J., Knudsen, H. C., et al et al (1999) (1999) Patient characteristics, needs, service provision Patient characteristics, needs, service provision and costs of care; study methodology. and costs of care; study methodology. British Journal of British Journal of Psychiatry Psychiatry, , 175 175, 514^521. , 514^521.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chisholm, D., Knapp, M. R. J., Knudsen, H. C., Amaddeo, F., Gaite, L., van Wijngaarden, B., & EPSILON Study Group
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • Universidad de Cantabria (ES)
Corresponding author
Chisholm, D.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2000-07
Volume
177
Issue
S39
Pages
s28-s33
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2088040467
Cited by
480
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
13.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nationaal Fonds Geestelijke Volksgezondheid
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
mental health service utilization, cross-cultural validation, instrument development, schizophrenia, mental illness, costs of care, international comparability, patient outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Data Collection, Europe, Health Services Research, Humans, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Schizophrenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review