Cited by 1,735Mental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major DepressionHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Global burden of depressive disorders in the year 2000

Open access
Üstün, T. B., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., Chatterji, S., Mathers, C., Murray, C. J. L.·2004·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The initial Global Burden of Disease study found that depression was the fourth leading cause of disease burden, accounting for 3.7% of total disability adjusted life years (DALYs) in the world in 1990. AIMS: To present the new estimates of depression burden for the year 2000. METHOD: DALYs for depressive disorders in each world region were calculated, based on new estimates of mortality, prevalence, incidence, average age at onset, duration and disability severity. RESULTS: Depression is the fourth leading cause of disease burden, accounting for 4.4% of total DALYs in the year 2000, and it causes the largest amount of non-fatal burden, accounting for almost 12% of all total years lived with disability worldwide. CONCLUSIONS: These data on the burden of depression worldwide represent a major public health problem that affects patients and society.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.184.5.386

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Üstün, T. B., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., Chatterji, S., Mathers, C., & Murray, C. J. L.
Affiliations
World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Üstün, T. B.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2004-05
Volume
184
Issue
5
Pages
386-392
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2145151017
Cited by
1,735
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 126 · 2016: 88 · 2015: 120 · 2014: 124 · 2013: 134 · 2012: 113
FWCI
83.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01mh035883-17)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH35883)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
depressive disorders, depression, global burden of disease, disability-adjusted life years, years lived with disability, depression prevalence, depression incidence, age of onset, disease duration, disability severity, public health burden
MeSH terms
Adult, Depressive Disorder, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Public Health, Global Health, Incidence, Prevalence, Cost of Illness, Quality-Adjusted Life Years

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review