Cited by 19Digital Mental Health InterventionsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMental Health Treatment and Access

Cost-effectiveness of different formats for delivery of cognitive behavioral therapy for depression: a systematic review based economic model

Open access
Wu, Qi, Li, Jinshuo, Parrott, Steve, López-López, José Antonio, Davies, Sarah R., Caldwell, Deborah M., Churchill, Rachel C., Peters, Tim J. +7 more·2020·Value in Health

Abstract

Objectives Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for depression. Different CBT delivery formats (face-to-face [F2F], multimedia, and hybrid) and intensities have been used to expand access to the treatment. The aim of this study is to estimate the long-term cost-effectiveness of different CBT delivery modes.Methods A decision-analytic model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different CBT delivery modes and variations in intensity in comparison with treatment as usual (TAU). The model covered an average treatment period of 4 months with a 5-year follow-up period. The model was populated using a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and various sources from the literature.Results Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of treatments compared with the next best option after excluding all the dominated and extended dominated options are: £209/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for 6 (sessions) × 30 (minutes) F2F-CBT versus TAU; £4 453/QALY for 8 × 30 F2F versus 6 × 30 F2F; £12 216/QALY for 8 × 60 F2F versus 8 × 30 F2F; and £43 072/QALY for 16 × 60 F2F versus 8 × 60 F2F. The treatment with the highest net monetary benefit for thresholds of £20 000 to £30 000/QALY was 8 × 30 F2F-CBT. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis illustrated 6 × 30 F2F-CBT had the highest probability (32.8%) of being cost-effective at £20 000/QALY; 16 × 60 F2F-CBT had the highest probability (31.0%) at £30 000/QALY.Conclusions All CBT delivery modes on top of TAU were found to be more cost-effective than TAU alone. Four F2F-CBT options (6 × 30, 8 × 30, 8 × 60, 16 × 60) are on the cost-effectiveness frontier. F2F-CBT with intensities of 6 × 30 and 16 × 60 had the highest probabilities of being cost-effective. The results, however, should be interpreted with caution owing to the high level of uncertainty.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jval.2020.07.008

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, Q., Li, J., Parrott, S., López-López, J. A., Davies, S. R., Caldwell, D. M., Churchill, R. C., Peters, T. J., Lewis, G., Tallon, D., Dawson, S., Taylor, A., Kessler, D. S., Wiles, N., & Welton, N. J.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • Universidad de Murcia (ES)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Wu, Qi
Venue
Value in Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
23
Issue
12
Pages
1662-1670
ISSN
1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3048942964
Cited by
19
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Value in Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, depression, cost-effectiveness, treatment delivery format, face-to-face therapy, hybrid therapy, treatment intensity, quality-adjusted life years, net monetary benefit, decision-analytic model, access to mental health care, long-term outcomes, treatment as usual comparison, probabilistic sensitivity analysis, health technology assessment
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Depression, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Health Care Costs, Models, Economic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review