Cited by 139Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

How durable is the effect of low intensity CBT for depression and anxiety? Remission and relapse in a longitudinal cohort study

Open access
Ali, Shehzad, Rhodes, Laura, Moreea, Omar, McMillan, Dean, Gilbody, Simon, Leach, Chris, Lucock, Mike, Lutz, Wolfgang +1 more·2017·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Background Depression and anxiety disorders are relapse-prone conditions, even after successful treatment with pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is known to prevent relapse, but there is little evidence of the durability of remission after low intensity forms of CBT (LiCBT).Method This study aimed to examine relapse rates 12 months after completing routinely-delivered LiCBT. A cohort of 439 LiCBT completers with remission of symptoms provided monthly depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7) measures during 12 months after treatment. Survival analysis was conducted to model time-to-relapse while controlling for patient characteristics.Results Overall, 53% of cases relapsed within 1 year. Of these relapse events, the majority (79%) occurred within the first 6 months post-treatment. Cases reporting residual depression symptoms (PHQ-9 = 5 to 9) at the end of treatment had significantly higher risk of relapse (hazard ratio = 1.90, p < 0.001).Conclusions The high rate of relapse after LiCBT highlights the need for relapse prevention, particularly for those with residual depression symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2017.04.006

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In major depressive disorder, 18-77% of patients experienced a relapse.

    “Likewise, with regard to major depressive disorder (MDD), 18–77% of patients experienced a relapse [22–28].”

    From Psychological interventions to prevent relapse in anxiety and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Time-to-event analysis reports that 52.8% of cases relapsed within 12 months, which falls within the claimed range. But the Sample characteristics and Outcome definitions describe a cohort with depression and/or anxiety, not an MDD-only relapse rate; the paper does not establish the 18–77% bounds. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A longitudinal study of low-intensity CBT using an RCI of ≤5 demonstrated a reliable change in 43.8% (181/439) of participants.

    “A longitudinal study of low-intensity CBT using an RCI of ≤5 demonstrated a reliable change in 43.8% (181/439) of the participants [71]”

    From Clinical Efficacy and Psychological Mechanisms of an App-Based Digital Therapeutic for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial (2021) · cites this paper as [71]

    The paper’s Table 1 reports 181 participants (43.8%) with an early response during low-intensity CBT, defined in its footnote as symptom reduction greater than the reliable change index between sessions 1 and 3. Section 2.2 specifies an RCI of ≥5 points, not ≤5; the table does not present 43.8% as the overall rate of reliable change. The stated fraction, 181/439, also does not equal 43.8%. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Residual depression symptoms in the non-depressed range strongly predict time to relapse/recurrence, including over long-term follow-up.

    “based on previous studies which show that residual symptoms in the non-depressed range are a strong predictor of time to relapse/recurrence, even over long-term follow-ups (Ali et al. 2017; Judd et al. 1997; Pintor et al. 2004).”
  • In the absence of long-term follow-up, a reduction in residual symptoms of depression can be regarded as an imperfect proxy for reduction in risk of relapse.

    “In the absence of long-term follow-up of service users, a reduction in residual symptoms of depression can also be regarded an imperfect proxy for reduction in risk of relapse (Ali et al. 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Richards DA, & Whyte M (2009). Reach out: National programme educator materials to support the delivery of training for psychological wellbeing practitioners delivering low intensity interventions (2nd ed.). London, UK: Rethink.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ali, S., Rhodes, L., Moreea, O., McMillan, D., Gilbody, S., Leach, C., Lucock, M., Lutz, W., & Delgadillo, J.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (GB)
  • University of Huddersfield (GB)
  • Universität Trier (DE)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Delgadillo, Jaime
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
94
Pages
1-8
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2605428381
Cited by
139
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 1
FWCI
13.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust, United Kingdom (FSF2010/11/08.11.2010)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy, depression, anxiety disorders, relapse, remission, relapse prevention, residual symptoms, treatment durability, post-treatment follow-up
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Remission Induction, Time Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review