CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 122Cognitive Functions and MemoryTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive training in affective disorders improves memory: A preliminary study using the NEAR approach

Naismith, Sharon L., Redoblado-Hodge, M. Antoinette, Lewis, Simon J.G., Scott, Elizabeth M., Hickie, Ian B.·2010·Journal of Affective Disorders
DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.028
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Neuropsychological deficits in depression include difficulties with psychomotor speed, executive functions and memory. Some of these changes persist despite antidepressant treatment. While research in other areas of psychiatry has shown cognitive training techniques to be effective, only one study has evaluated this approach in depression.Methods Sixteen patients (mean age=33.5years) with a lifetime diagnosis of major depressive disorder were administered a standardised battery of neuropsychological tests and allocated to treatment (n=8) or waitlist control (n=8) conditions. The treatment consisted of 10-weeks of twice weekly cognitive training using the Neuropsychological Educational Approach to Remediation. All participants were re-assessed after 10-weeks by interviewers blinded to group allocation.Results Participants in the treatment condition demonstrated greater improvements on tests of memory encoding and memory retention than the waitlist control group. There were no observable benefits in terms of psychomotor speed or executive functions or in self-reported levels of disability. Affective symptoms also remained stable.Limitations This study included a small sample of participants and treatment allocation was not randomised.Conclusions Cognitive training in affective disorders improves memory performance. It may be an effective non-pharmacological treatment option for improving cognitive functions, which in turn, may improve psychosocial functioning and reduce disability. This study supports theories suggesting cognitive training may promote neuroplasticity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.028

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 122

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Naismith, S. L., Redoblado-Hodge, M. A., Lewis, S. J. G., Scott, E. M., & Hickie, I. B.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Naismith, Sharon L.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
121
Issue
3
Pages
258-262
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.028
OpenAlex
W2064581735
Cited by
122
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
10.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Sydney
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cognitive training, major depressive disorder, memory, neuropsychological deficits, memory encoding, memory retention, psychomotor speed, executive function, neuroplasticity, non-pharmacological treatment, cognitive remediation
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition Disorders, Combined Modality Therapy, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Psychomotor Performance, Psychotropic Drugs, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Remedial Teaching, Retention, Psychology, Treatment Outcome, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review