Cited by 76Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesWorkplace Health and Well-beingMental Health Treatment and Access

Occupational impairment and social anxiety disorder in a sample of primary care patients

Open access
Moitra, Ethan, Beard, Courtney, Weisberg, Risa B., Keller, Martin B.·2011·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is the second most prevalent psychiatric condition in the US. Because of the inherent nature of SAD, it may cause impairments in workplace functioning, particularly compared to other anxiety disorders that do not necessarily lead to social impairments. In this study, we compared workplace functioning in primary care patients with SAD to patients with other anxiety disorders and comorbid Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).Methods Data are obtained from the Primary Care Anxiety Project (PCAP), a naturalistic, longitudinal study of anxiety disorders in 539 primary care patients. We examined intake demographic and interviewer-assessed ratings of workplace functioning.Results Results revealed that patients with SAD and MDD had significantly decreased workplace functioning, compared to individuals with other anxiety disorders. Furthermore, results showed that patients with SAD were greater than two-times more likely to be unemployed, but expected to work, than all other patients.Limitations Workplace functioning was not measured objectively and the sample may not be representative of the general population.Conclusions These findings highlight the particular need to assess for the presence of undereducation and underperformance at work and/or underemployment in individuals with SAD, as they are at most risk for these impairments. Additionally, early detection and intervention in individuals with or at risk for SAD may curb the future impact of social anxiety on occupational attainment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2010.09.024

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longitudinal studies show higher unemployment among individuals with social anxiety disorder than among persons with other mental disorders.

    “Longitudinal studies of individuals with SAD show higher levels of unemployment compared to persons with other mental disorders (Keller, 2006; Moitra et al., 2011; Tolman et al., 2009).”

    From Work-Related Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for racially and economically diverse unemployed persons with social anxiety: A randomized clinical trial (2024) · cites this paper as Moitra et al., 2011

    The Results (Primary analyses, page unavailable) report that patients with SAD were more than twice as likely to be unemployed as the comparison patients. However, Methods (Procedures, page unavailable) says this paper analyzed only baseline data from a longitudinal project. It therefore supports the unemployment comparison, but not the characterization of this finding as longitudinal. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moitra, E., Beard, C., Weisberg, R. B., & Keller, M. B.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Moitra, Ethan
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
130
Issue
1-2
Pages
209-212
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169145181
Cited by
76
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer Inc
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F32 MH083330, K23 MH069595)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, occupational impairment, workplace functioning, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, unemployment, underemployment, primary care patients, psychiatric comorbidity
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Phobic Disorders, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Unemployment, Comorbidity, Linear Models, Logistic Models, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review