Cited by 62Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Work-related CBT versus vocational services as usual for unemployed persons with social anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled pilot trial

Open access
Himle, Joseph A., Bybee, Deborah, Steinberger, Edward, Laviolette, Wayne T., Weaver, Addie, Vlnka, Sarah, Golenberg, Zipora, Levine, Debra Siegel +2 more·2014·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

We designed and pilot-tested a group-based, work-related cognitive-behavioral therapy (WCBT) for unemployed individuals with social anxiety disorder (SAD). WCBT, delivered in a vocational service setting by vocational service professionals, aims to reduce social anxiety and enable individuals to seek, obtain, and retain employment. We compared WCBT to a vocational services as usual control condition (VSAU). Participants were unemployed, homeless, largely African American, vocational service-seeking adults with SAD (N = 58), randomized to receive either eight sessions of WCBT plus VSAU or VSAU alone and followed three months post-treatment. Multilevel modeling revealed significantly greater reductions in social anxiety, general anxiety, depression, and functional impairment for WCBT compared to VSAU. Coefficients for job search activity and self-efficacy indicated greater increases for WCBT. Hours worked per week in the follow-up period did not differ between the groups, but small sample size and challenges associated with measuring work hours may have contributed to this finding. Overall, the results of this study suggest that unemployed persons with SAD can be effectively treated with specialized work-related CBT administered by vocational service professionals. Future testing of WCBT with a larger sample, a longer follow-up period, and adequate power to assess employment outcomes is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2014.10.005

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Mini-SPIN threshold of 5 or more was selected because previous research indicates it maximizes sensitivity and specificity and produces acceptable diagnostic accuracy.

    “We selected a score of ≥ 5 on the Mini-SPIN as a screening threshold given that our previous research with this population indicates that a score of 5 or more maximizes sensitivity and specificity and produces an acceptable diagnostic accuracy rate (Himle et al., 2014).”

    From Work-Related Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for racially and economically diverse unemployed persons with social anxiety: A randomized clinical trial (2024) · cites this paper as Himle et al., 2014

    The Method > Measures passage says the study used a Mini-SPIN screening threshold of 4 or greater, not 5 or greater. It says research with this population found that a score of 4 maximized sensitivity and specificity, with a diagnostic accuracy rate of 83.4%. (LLM, conf=0.95)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This effect size is conservative compared to the LSAS total effect size of 1.10 at 3-month follow-up in the pilot randomized controlled trial.

    “This effect size is conservative compared to the LSAS total effect size of 1.10 at 3-month follow-up in the pilot RCT (Himle et al., 2014).”

    From Work-Related Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for racially and economically diverse unemployed persons with social anxiety: A randomized clinical trial (2024) · cites this paper as Himle et al., 2014

    The Results (Outcomes by Condition over Time; page unavailable) report significant follow-up differences between work-related CBT and usual vocational services, with mental-health effect sizes ranging from d = −0.86 to −1.37. The Methods (Data Analysis; page unavailable) identify the follow-up as the point used to estimate condition effects. Our copy does not give an LSAS total effect size of 1.10, so the specific number cannot be verified. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • VSAU-alone improvement was not observed in the prior RCT.

    “VSAU-alone improvement was not observed in our prior RCT (Himle et al., 2014).”

    From Work-Related Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for racially and economically diverse unemployed persons with social anxiety: A randomized clinical trial (2024) · cites this paper as Himle et al., 2014

    The Results (Outcomes by Condition over Time; page unavailable) report that the proportion meeting social anxiety disorder diagnostic criteria remained at 100% in the VSAU group, supporting no improvement on that measure. The claim does not specify an outcome, however, and the paper does not establish that VSAU showed no improvement on every measure. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the pilot randomized controlled trial, gains were maintained at three-month follow-up.

    “Gains were maintained at three-month follow-up (Himle et al., 2014).”
  • All primary and secondary outcome measures were successfully used in the prior randomized controlled trial of WCBT.

    “All primary and secondary outcome measures were successfully used in our prior RCT of WCBT which included a sample primarily comprised of participants identifying as racial and/or ethnic minorities (Himle et al., 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Guy W 1976 ECDEU Assessment for Psychopharmacology, Revised Edition Rockville, MD NIMH Publication
  2. Levine DS Himle JA Vlnka S Steinberger E Laviolette WT Bybee D 2013 Effectiveness of the Mini-Social Phobia Inventory (Mini-SPIN) as a screener for social anxiety disorder in a low-income, job-seeking sample under review

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Himle, J. A., Bybee, D., Steinberger, E., Laviolette, W. T., Weaver, A., Vlnka, S., Golenberg, Z., Levine, D. S., Heimberg, R. G., & O'Donnell, L. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Himle, Joseph A.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
63
Pages
169-176
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070578705
Cited by
62
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH083031)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, unemployment, vocational services, employment retention, job search behavior, self-efficacy, functional disability, depression, general anxiety, homeless adults, African American adults, group therapy
MeSH terms
Phobia, Social, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Medically Underserved Area, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Psychotherapy, Group, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Unemployment, Cohort Studies, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review