Cited by 44Mental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major DepressionHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

The epidemiological modelling of dysthymia: Application for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

Charlson, Fiona J., Ferrari, Alize J., Flaxman, Abraham D., Whiteford, Harvey A.·2013·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background In order to capture the differences in burden between the subtypes of depression, the Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study for the first time estimated the burden of dysthymia and major depressive disorder separately from the previously used umbrella term 'unipolar depression'. A global summary of epidemiological parameters are necessary inputs in burden of disease calculations for 21 world regions, males and females and for the year 1990, 2005 and 2010. This paper reports findings from a systematic review of global epidemiological data and the subsequent development of an internally consistent epidemiological model of dysthymia.Methods A systematic search was conducted to identify data sources for the prevalence, incidence, remission and excess-mortality of dysthymia using Medline, PsycINFO and EMBASE electronic databases and grey literature. DisMod-MR, a Bayesian meta-regression tool, was used to check the epidemiological parameters for internal consistency and to predict estimates for world regions with no or few data.Results The systematic review identified 38 studies meeting inclusion criteria which provided 147 data points for 30 countries in 13 of 21 world regions. Prevalence increases in the early ages, peaking at around 50 years. Females have higher prevalence of dysthymia than males. Global pooled prevalence remained constant across time points at 1.55% (95%CI 1.50-1.60). There was very little regional variation in prevalence estimates.Limitations There were eight GBD world regions for which we found no data for which DisMod-MR had to impute estimates.Conclusion The addition of internally consistent epidemiological estimates by world region, age, sex and year for dysthymia contributed to a more comprehensive estimate of mental health burden in GBD 2010.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.060

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Charlson, F. J., Ferrari, A. J., Flaxman, A. D., & Whiteford, H. A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
151
Issue
1
Pages
111-120
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166748277
Cited by
44
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
dysthymia, major depressive disorder, depression subtypes, global burden of disease, prevalence, incidence, remission, excess mortality, sex differences, age differences, epidemic modeling, Bayesian meta-regression, mental health burden
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Global Health, Models, Statistical, Incidence, Prevalence, Cost of Illness, Dysthymic Disorder, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review