Cited by 331Mental Health Treatment and AccessTreatment of Major DepressionHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

The epidemiological modelling of major depressive disorder: application for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

Open access
Ferrari, Alize J., Charlson, Fiona J., Norman, Rosana E., Flaxman, Abraham D., Patten, Scott B., Vos, Theo, Whiteford, Harvey A.·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the detrimental impact of major depressive disorder (MDD) at the individual level has been described, its global epidemiology remains unclear given limitations in the data. Here we present the modelled epidemiological profile of MDD dealing with heterogeneity in the data, enforcing internal consistency between epidemiological parameters and making estimates for world regions with no empirical data. These estimates were used to quantify the burden of MDD for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 (GBD 2010). METHOD: Analyses drew on data from our existing literature review of the epidemiology of MDD. DisMod-MR, the latest version of the generic disease modelling system redesigned as a Bayesian meta-regression tool, derived prevalence by age, year and sex for 21 regions. Prior epidemiological knowledge, study- and country-level covariates adjusted sub-optimal raw data. RESULTS: There were over 298 million cases of MDD globally at any point in time in 2010, with the highest proportion of cases occurring between 25 and 34 years. Global point prevalence was very similar across time (4.4% (95% uncertainty: 4.2-4.7%) in 1990, 4.4% (4.1-4.7%) in 2005 and 2010), but higher in females (5.5% (5.0-6.0%) compared to males (3.2% (3.0-3.6%) in 2010. Regions in conflict had higher prevalence than those with no conflict. The annual incidence of an episode of MDD followed a similar age and regional pattern to prevalence but was about one and a half times higher, consistent with an average duration of 37.7 weeks. CONCLUSION: We were able to integrate available data, including those from high quality surveys and sub-optimal studies, into a model adjusting for known methodological sources of heterogeneity. We were also able to estimate the epidemiology of MDD in regions with no available data. This informed GBD 2010 and the public health field, with a clearer understanding of the global distribution of MDD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0069637

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [16]Kessler RC, Ustun TB, editors(2008) The WHO World Mental Health Surveys: global perspectives on the epidemiology of mental disorders. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  2. [26]Flaxman AD, Vos T, Murray CJL, editors(2013) An integrative metaregression framework for descriptive epidemiology. Washington: University of Washington Press, In press.
  3. [63]Angst J, Gamma A, Gastpar M, Lepine JP, Mendlewicz J, et al (2002) Gender differences in depression. Epidemiological findings from the European DEPRES I and II studies. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 252: 201– 209. 12451460

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferrari, A. J., Charlson, F. J., Norman, R. E., Flaxman, A. D., Patten, S. B., Vos, T., & Whiteford, H. A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Ferrari, Alize J.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-07-29
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
e69637
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1504574652
Cited by
330
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 5
FWCI
33.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
major depressive disorder, global burden of disease, disease prevalence, incidence, depression duration, sex differences, conflict zones, age distribution, Bayesian meta-regression, global epidemiology
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Child, Preschool, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review