Cited by 149Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

The Parental Overprotection Scale: Associations with child and parental anxiety

Open access
Clarke, Kiri, Cooper, Peter, Creswell, Cathy·2013·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Parental overprotection has commonly been implicated in the development and maintenance of childhood anxiety disorders. Overprotection has been assessed using questionnaire and observational methods interchangeably; however, the extent to which these methods access the same construct has received little attention. Edwards et al. (2008, 2010) developed a promising parent-report measure of overprotection (OP) and reported that, with parents of pre-school children, the measure correlated with observational assessments and predicted changes in child anxiety symptoms. We aimed to validate the use of the OP measure with mothers of children in middle childhood, and examine its association with child and parental anxiety. METHODS: Mothers of 90 children (60 clinically anxious, 30 non-anxious) aged 7-12 years completed the measure and engaged in a series of mildly stressful tasks with their child. RESULTS: The internal reliability of the measure was good and scores correlated significantly with observations of maternal overprotection in a challenging puzzle task. Contrary to expectations, OP was not significantly associated with child anxiety status or symptoms, but was significantly associated with maternal anxiety symptoms. LIMITATIONS: Participants were predominantly from affluent social groups and of non-minority status. Overprotection is a broad construct, the use of specific sub-dimensions of behavioural constructs may be preferable. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the use of the OP measure to assess parental overprotection among 7-12 year-old children; however, they suggest that parental responses may be more closely related to the degree of parental rather than child anxiety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2013.07.007

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parents of anxious children are more likely to be overprotective, which may make them less likely to notice their children's avoidance.

    “Additionally, research has shown that parents of anxious children are more likely to be overprotective (e.g., Clarke et al., 2013), which may make them less likely to notice their children's avoidance, thus potentially normalizing it in some way and discouraging the child's independence and courageous behavior.”

    From Child- and Parent-Report Measures of Behavioral Avoidance (CAMS/CAMP): Portuguese Validation in Clinical and Non-Clinical Samples. (2024) · cites this paper as Clarke et al., 2013

    The citation is attached to the claim that parents of anxious children are more likely to be overprotective. Although the Introduction describes an association reported in earlier research, this paper’s Results found no significant difference in overprotection between mothers of anxious and non-anxious children aged 7–12; the Discussion explicitly calls this contrary to expectations. The later suggestion about noticing avoidance is the citing authors’ inference, not the point cited to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. HMSO The National Statistics Socio-economic Classification User Manual. In The Office for National Statistics 2005 Palgrave, MacMillan Basingstoke

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clarke, K., Cooper, P., & Creswell, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Reading (GB)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Creswell, Cathy
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
151
Issue
2
Pages
618-624
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170136166
Cited by
149
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
parental overprotection, childhood anxiety, maternal anxiety, middle childhood, parent-report measures, observational assessment, internal consistency
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mothers, Parent-Child Relations, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review