Cited by 314Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental HealthCancer survivorship and care

The prevalence of moderate-to-high posttraumatic growth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Wu, Xiaoli, Kaminga, Atipatsa C, Dai, Wenjie, Deng, Jing, Wang, Zhipeng, Pan, Xiongfeng, Liu, Aizhong·2019·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Posttraumatic growth (PTG) is positive psychological changes after encountering challenging events. The main purpose of this meta-analysis was to summarize the prevalence of moderate-to-high PTG in people who experienced traumatic events and to understand what social-demographic and trauma characteristics distinguish those who show a high rate of PTG from those of low level. Methods Six electronic databases were searched. Loney's appraisal criteria were used to evaluate the quality of studies. Freeman-Turkey double arcsine transformation method was used to calculate the combined prevalence. Age, time since event, type of trauma and trauma form were analyzed as subgroup factors. According to the source of the trauma, the type of trauma was divided into three different categories: disease, accident and specific profession. Specific profession refers to firefighters, veterans, intensive care staff, etc. The complex working environment, irregular lifestyle, various unpredictable factors, as well as the frequently adverse stimuli from others contribute to great physical and mental pressure. Results Twenty-six articles were deemed as qualified for this systematic review and meta-analysis. The level of PTG across studies ranged from 10% to 77.3%, and heterogeneity tests showed high heterogeneity (I 2 = 92.3%, 95%CI = 90.1%-94.0%, p Limitations Because the included studies haven't provided adequate PTG-related information, these factors could not be used to performed subgr…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.023

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, X., Kaminga, A. C., Dai, W., Deng, J., Wang, Z., Pan, X., & Liu, A.
Affiliations
Central South University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Aizhong
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
243
Pages
408-415
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891592894
Cited by
314
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
posttraumatic growth, prevalence, traumatic events, sociodemographic factors, trauma characteristics, occupational injuries, firefighters, veterans, intensive care staff, age, time since trauma, direct trauma, psychological resilience
MeSH terms
Posttraumatic Growth, Psychological, Humans, Models, Statistical, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review