Cited by 158Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyMental Health via Writing

Is social media screen time really associated with poor adolescent mental health? A time use diary study

Open access
Barthorpe, Amber, Winstone, Lizzy, Mars, Becky, Moran, Paul·2020·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background There is increasing concern regarding the potential impact of social media use on the mental health of young people. Previous research has relied heavily on retrospective accounts of social media screen-time. Yet recent evidence suggests that such self-report measures are unreliable, correlating poorly with more objective measures of social media use. In principle, time use diaries provide a less biased measure of social media use. Methods We analysed cross-sectional data from the Millennium Cohort Study to explore associations between social media screen-time as recorded in time use diaries (TUD) and key mental health outcomes - self-harm in the past year, depressive symptoms (Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire), self-esteem (shortened Rosenberg scale) - in adolescence. Social media TUD data were available for 4,032 participants (25.4% aged 13; 73.5% aged 14; 1.1% aged 15). Results Following adjustment for confounders, a greater amount of time spent on social media was associated with an increased risk of self-harm (adjusted OR per 30-minute increase in weekday use: 1.13, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.21) and depression (adjusted B ==0.36, 95%CI 0.22 to 0.50) and lower levels of self-esteem (adjusted B = -0.12, 95%CI -0.20 to -0.04) in females. Findings were similar for weekday and weekend use. Limitations The cross-sectional nature of the data limits inference in relation to the causal direction of these associations. Conclusions Future research should examine the direction of the associations with self-harm and other mental health outcomes and explore gender differences in how adolescents engage with social media as well as how much time they spend online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.106

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social media's impact on mental health tends to be more pronounced in females.

    “research focusing on adolescence reveals that social media’s impact on mental health tends to be more pronounced in females (Barthorpe et al., 2020; Kelly et al., 2019; Twenge et al., 2022).”

    From The associations between social comparison on social media and young adults’ mental health (2025) · cites this paper as Barthorpe et al., 2020

    The available passage from our copy contains only the paper’s title and author information, not findings about sex differences. Searches for females and gender differences returned no further passages, so the claimed stronger association in females cannot be verified from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barthorpe, A., Winstone, L., Mars, B., & Moran, P.
Affiliations
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Winstone, Lizzy
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
274
Pages
864-870
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3029678251
Cited by
158
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3
FWCI
19.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Explore Bristol Research (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (PD‐SPH‐2015)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
social media use, screen time, adolescent mental health, self-harm, depressive symptoms, self-esteem, time diaries, self-report reliability, gender differences, Millennium Cohort Study
MeSH terms
Screen Time, Adolescent, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Mental Health, Retrospective Studies, Self Concept, Cohort Studies, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review