Cited by 73COVID-19 and Mental HealthStudent Stress and CopingMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

An evaluation of mental health and emotion regulation experienced by undergraduate nursing students in China during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.

Open access
Zhu, Yuanyuan, Wang, Hongyun, Wang, Aihong·2021·International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak negatively impacted the mental health and emotions of many individuals. The study presented here explores the mental health and emotion regulation experienced by undergraduate nursing students in China during the pandemic. Potential risk factors related to negative mental health symptoms were identified in this study. An online cross-sectional study including 342 respondents was performed from March 6, 2020, to April 1, 2020, at a University in China. A Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) were used to evaluate mental health and emotions. The statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22. The prevalence of anxiety, depression, or comorbid anxiety and depression were 55.0%, 56.4%, and 31.6%, respectively. The mean score of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression was 29.36 ± 8.00 and 15.55 ± 5.14. Lower scores for cognitive reappraisal and higher scores for expressive suppression were susceptible to symptoms of anxiety, depression, or comorbid anxiety and depression. Issues with mental health occurred in nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings from this study provide a better understanding of the association between mental health and emotion regulation, which will help direct psychological intervention that relieves these issues during the pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/inm.12867

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A cross-sectional study on the mental health of Chinese undergraduate nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic showed that the prevalence of anxiety and depression was 55.0% and 56.4%, while 31.6% of nursing students suffered from the two disorders simultaneously, which was higher than among other medical students.

    “A cross-sectional study on the mental health of Chinese undergraduate nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic showed that the prevalence of anxiety and depression was 55.0 and 56.4%, while 31.6% of nursing students suffered from the two disorders simultaneously, which was higher than those among other medical students (16).”

    From Mindfulness-based online intervention on mental health among undergraduate nursing students during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Beijing, China: A randomized controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as [16]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Brooks, S.K. , Webster, R.K. , Smith, L.E. et al. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce. The Lancet, 395, 912–920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. He, X. , Li, C. , Qian, J. et al. (2010). Reliability and validity of a generalized anxiety disorder scale in general hospital outpatients. Shanghai Jingshen Yixue, 22, 200–203. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang, L. , Liu, H. , Li, Z. et al. (2017). Reliability and validity of emotion regulation Queationnaire Chinese revised version. China Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 503–505. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, Y., Wang, H., & Wang, A.
Affiliations
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhu, Yuanyuan
Venue
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-04-13
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
1160-1169
ISSN
  • 1445-8330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0349
OpenAlex
W3153391857
Cited by
73
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 6
FWCI
9.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (2019YSHL027)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, nursing students, mental health, emotion regulation, anxiety, depression, comorbid depression and anxiety, cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, risk factors, psychological intervention
MeSH terms
Emotional Regulation, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Anxiety, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Mental Health, Students, Nursing, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review