Cited by 42Eating Disorders and BehaviorsImpact of Technology on AdolescentsBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Social media use and body image issues among adolescents in a vulnerable Louisiana community

Open access
Sagrera, Caroline E., Magner, Johnette, Temple, Jazzlynn, Lawrence, Robert, Magner, Timothy J., Avila-Quintero, Victor J., McPherson, Pamela, Alderman, Laura Lane +3 more·2022·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

Widespread concern has been expressed regarding unrealistic body image and adolescent eating disorder promoting content on social media (SM) platforms. Numerous research studies have examined the impact of SM on body image as well as social vulnerability on negative mental health outcomes. Despite this, few previous studies have examined the impact of SM on body image specifically in vulnerable, underserved, or predominantly minority communities. This study examines the impact of SM on body image issues (BII) in adolescents in a public school system where greater than 50% of the students live in impoverished households. In late 2019, high school student leaders in Northwest Louisiana developed a survey alongside Step Forward, a collective impact initiative. Questions investigated adolescent SM use and mental health in Caddo Parish, namely BII. Teachers within Caddo Parish Public School System administered the survey. Out of the 11,248 total high school students in the school system, nearly 50% were sampled for a sample size of 5,070. Hypotheses included: (1) females were more likely to use SM than males, (2) increasing time spent on SM would correlate with females reporting BII, with males remaining largely unaffected, and (3) highly visual social media (HVSM) platforms would be associated with greater reports of BII than non-HVSM platforms. Results showed females were more likely to use SM (p < 0.001) and report BII (p < 0.001) compared to males, while both sexes reported BII with increasing time spent on SM (p < 0.001). A diversity of platforms were associated with increased BII among SM users compared to non-users (p < 0.001): Pinterest, Reddit, Snapchat, TikTok, Twitter, and YouTube. This conclusion is tempered by the omission of race as a variable in the study design, the use of self-report, and the use of an unvalidated instrument. These findings suggest that the harmful association between SM use and BII may transcend culture and socioeconomic status for a broadly deleterious effect on adolescent mental wellbeing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1001336

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ten studies differentiated the population between active and passive users, while only one conducted a content analysis of posts, hashtags, or videos.

    “Given that, ten studies differentiated the population between active and passive users [42, 67, 70, 72, 74–79], while only one conducted a content analysis of the posts, hashtags, or videos [78].”

    From Scrolling through adolescence: a systematic review of the impact of TikTok on adolescent mental health (2025) · cites this paper as [70]

    The citation to this paper is attached to the claim that one study conducted content analysis of posts, hashtags, or videos. Its Materials and methods (Data collection and Statistical analysis; page unavailable) instead describe a cross-sectional analysis of a student survey using statistical tests and logistic regression. The paper also does not report differentiating active from passive users. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Among included studies, only four reported data about total daily screen time, and four detailed the amount of time spent on TikTok.

    “Among the included studies, only four reported data about total daily screen time [67–70], and four detailed the amount the time spent on TikTok [42, 67, 71, 72].”

    From Scrolling through adolescence: a systematic review of the impact of TikTok on adolescent mental health (2025) · cites this paper as [70]

    In Results (Hypothesis 2; page unavailable), the paper reports daily time spent on social media, but not total daily screen time. Its TikTok tables report whether participants used TikTok, not how long they spent on it. This paper also cannot establish the citing review’s counts of four studies in each category. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The analyzed effects of TikTok use included increased body image concerns and self-esteem issues.

    “The analyzed effects encompassed lower life satisfaction [79], increased depressive symptoms [68], higher levels of anger and loneliness [72], risk of PTU [69, 83, 84], increased body image concerns, and self-esteem issues [42, 70, 80], as well as the rapid spreading of functional tic-like behaviors [76, 77].”

    From Scrolling through adolescence: a systematic review of the impact of TikTok on adolescent mental health (2025) · cites this paper as [70]

    The Results (Hypothesis 2, Table 3) associate TikTok use with higher odds of self-reported body image issues, and the Discussion describes a statistically significant association. The paper does not report a TikTok-specific self-esteem outcome, and its observational association does not establish that TikTok caused the increase. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Four of the included studies assessed wellbeing indicators, like creativity, innovation, life satisfaction, and health habits, while sixteen assessed mental disorder indicators such as depression, anxiety, stress or body image issues.

    “Four of the studies [68, 75, 79, 80] assessed wellbeing indicators, like creativity, innovation, life satisfaction, and health habits, while sixteen assessed mental disorder indicators such as depression, anxiety, stress or body image issues [42, 67, 68, 70–73, 76–79, 81–85].”
  • Eleven studies used self-developed questionnaires for outcome evaluation, of which only six paired it with standardized measures.

    “Eleven studies used self-developed questionnaires for outcome evaluation [42, 67–72, 74, 80–82], of which only six paired it with standardized measures [67–69, 71, 72, 80, 81].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [30]Public School Review,. Caddo Parish School District (2021). Available online at: https://www.publicschoolreview.com/louisiana/caddo-parish-school-district/2200300-school-district (accessed June, 2022).
  2. [38]Gooch K. 10 Best, Worst States for Healthcare. Chicago, IL: Becker’s Hospital Review (2021).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sagrera, C. E., Magner, J., Temple, J., Lawrence, R., Magner, T. J., Avila-Quintero, V. J., McPherson, P., Alderman, L. L., Bhuiyan, M. A. N., Patterson, J. C., & Murnane, K. S.
Affiliations
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Sagrera, Caroline E.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2022-11-03
Volume
13
Pages
1001336-1001336
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4308417186
Cited by
42
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Louisiana State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
social media use, adolescents, eating disorders, high school students, socioeconomic vulnerability, minority groups, gender differences, adolescent mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review