Cited by 10Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionChild Abuse and TraumaSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Violence and Psychosocial Stress: A 10-Year Time Trend Analysis

dos Santos, Alane Tamyres, Soares, Fernanda Cunha, Lima, Rodrigo Antunes, dos Santos, Simone José, Silva, Caroline Ramos de Moura, Bezerra, Jorge, de Barros, Mauro Virgilio Gomes·2021·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Aim The aim of this study was to analyze the temporal trend of psychosocial stress and its association between exposure to violence in adolescents.Methods This is a cross-sectional study of temporal trends based on three school-based and statewide surveys with regular intervals of five years. The target population consisted of high school students from public schools. A total of 4,207 adolescents were evaluated in 2006, 6,264 in 2011, and 6,002 in 2016. The psychosocial stress indicator was the dependent study variable and was analyzed according to questions: a) Feeling of loneliness; b) Feeling of sadness; c) Difficulty sleeping due to worry; d) Number of close friends; e) Suicide ideation. Exposure variables were exposure to physical violence, involvement in fights and bullying. Logistic and linear regressions were used to verify the temporal trend of psychosocial stress, and to analyze the association between exposure of violence and psychosocial stress.Results Regardless of gender, the psychosocial stress score increasing trend between 2006 and 2016. The girls showed a variation in the feeling of loneliness from 18.7% to 22.8%, and suicide ideation increased from 10.4% to 14.2% between 2006 and 2016. All types of violence were associated with greater psychosocial stress for both boys and girls.Conclusion Adolescents had a higher prevalence of feelings of loneliness, difficulty sleeping due to worry and suicide ideation during the period from 2006 to 2016, regardless of gender. Exposure to violence is associated with psychosocial stress in both genders, however, the strongest associations occurred in girls.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.011

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
dos Santos, A. T., Soares, F. C., Lima, R. A., dos Santos, S. J., Silva, C. R. D. M., Bezerra, J., & de Barros, M. V. G.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (ES)
  • Universidade de Pernambuco (BR)
Corresponding author
Soares, Fernanda Cunha
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
295
Pages
116-122
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3195147823
Cited by
10
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (432144/2016-1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
psychosocial stress, bullying, physical violence, suicidal ideation, loneliness, sleep disorders, high school students, temporal trends, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Schools, Stress, Psychological, Violence, Bullying, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review