Cited by 17Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research Topics

Validation of a brief tool to assess and monitor suicidal ideation: The Youth Suicide Ideation Screen (YSIS-3)

Open access
Hetrick, Sarah E., Gao, Caroline X., Filia, Kate M., Menssink, Jana M., Rickwood, Debra J., Herrman, Helen, Hickie, Ian, McGorry, Patrick +3 more·2021·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background . Suicidal ideation is common in young people. Assessment and monitoring can help to understand its dynamic nature and inform treatment planning.Aims . The aims were to evaluate psychometric properties of a brief screening tool - the Youth Suicide Ideation Screen-3 item (YSIS-3) and determine its correlation with the Suicidal Ideation Question-Junior (SIQ-JR) and measures of depressive and anxiety symptoms a.Method . Cronbach's alpha (α) was used to evaluate internal consistency of the YSIS-3 in 1107 young people. Convergent validity was evaluated using network analysis based on individual item polychoric correlations. Structural equation modelling was used to understand latent constructs; pearson product moment correlations to validate the integrity of the underlying construct. and two-way mixed Intraclass Correlation Coefficient to examine longitudinal stability and Cohen's d to assess sensitivity to change.Results . The YSIS-3 was found to have internal consistency, convergent validity and criteria validity almost identical to the 15-item SIQ-JR. There was a high correlation (0.91) between the latent factor underpinning YSIS-3 and SIQ-JR. The YSIS-3 was more sensitive to change among those presenting with suicidal ideation at baseline.Conclusions . The YSIS-3 is a valid measure for the assessment and monitoring of suicidal ideation, and is sensitive to change. This brief measure can contribute to regular monitoring of the presence and nature of suicidal ideation, which when included in comprehensive assessment, will inform the clinical management of those at risk of suicide.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.053

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional risk screening tools shown to be effective in youth populations include the SIQ-JR, YSIS-3, and CHRT-SR.

    “Additional risk screening tools shown to be effective in youth populations include the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ-JR),43 Youth Suicide Ideation Screen (YSIS-3),44 and the Concise Health Risk Tracking Self-Report (CHRT-SR) 45”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hetrick, S. E., Gao, C. X., Filia, K. M., Menssink, J. M., Rickwood, D. J., Herrman, H., Hickie, I., McGorry, P., Telford, N., Parker, A. G., & Cotton, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of Canberra (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Victoria University (AU)
Corresponding author
Cotton, Sue M.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
295
Pages
235-242
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3198851626
Cited by
17
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • University of Melbourne
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1076940)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
suicidal ideation, suicide risk screening, psychometric validation, adolescents, internal consistency, convergent validity, sensitivity to change, longitudinal stability, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Humans, Mass Screening, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review