Short-term change and prediction of suicidal ideation among adolescents: a daily diary study following psychiatric hospitalization
Open accessAbstract
Background: Our understanding of suicidal ideation ( SI ) and its risk precursors is largely informed by studies spanning over wide time intervals (weeks, months, years). Little is known about SI as it occurs in daily lives of individuals at risk for suicide, the extent to which suicidal thoughts are dynamic over short periods of time, and the degree to which theoretically informed risk factors predict near‐term SI . Methods: Thirty‐four adolescents hospitalized due to last‐month suicide attempt and/or last‐week SI (76% female; ages 13–17) responded to daily surveys sent to their cell phones for four consecutive weeks after discharge ( n = 652 observations). Results: There was notable variability in day‐to‐day SI , with half of ideation ratings changing at least one within‐person standard deviation from one day to the next. Results of mixed effects models revealed concurrent (same‐day), but not short‐term prospective (next‐day), associations between SI (frequency, duration, urge) and well‐established predictors (connectedness, burdensomeness, hopelessness). However, synergistic effects of low connectedness with either high burdensomeness or high hopelessness were reliably associated with more severe same‐ and next‐day suicidal ideation. Conclusions: This study adds to emerging literature indicating that suicidal thoughts fluctuate considerably among individuals at risk for suicide, further extending it by focusing on adolescents in the critical posthospitalization period. Fostering high‐risk adolescents’ sense of connectedness to others may be an especially promising intervention target. Frequent assessment of SI and its predictors, independently and in combination, could help identify promising predictors of short‐term risk and meaningful intervention targets in high‐risk teens.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In 34 recently psychiatrically hospitalized adolescents followed with daily surveys for 28 days, suicidal ideation fluctuated substantially day to day, with 43–47% of variance in frequency, duration, and urge due to within-person variability. Connectedness, burdensomeness, and hopelessness showed concurrent but not independent next-day associations with ideation; however, low connectedness combined with high burdensomeness or high hopelessness predicted more severe same- and next-day ideation.
Key findings
- Any suicidal ideation was reported on 24.4% of daily responses (159 events), and 24 of 34 participants (70.6%) endorsed ideation at least once. About half of ideation ratings changed by at least one within-person standard deviation from one day to the next: 54.7% for frequency, 44% for duration, and 43.3% for urge.
- Within-person variability accounted for 43%, 46%, and 47% of the variance in suicidal ideation frequency, duration, and urge, respectively. Predictors also varied day to day: connectedness 37%, burdensomeness 31%, and hopelessness 33%.
- In mixed effects models, lower connectedness, greater burdensomeness, and higher hopelessness had significant same-day, but not next-day, independent associations with suicidal ideation; only previous-day suicidal ideation independently predicted next-day ideation.
- Synergistic effects were found: low connectedness with either high burdensomeness or high hopelessness was associated with more severe same- and next-day suicidal ideation. Prospectively, connectedness × burdensomeness predicted next-day frequency, duration, and urge, while connectedness × hopelessness predicted next-day frequency and duration.
Methods
- Design and sample: ecological momentary assessment/daily diary study of 34 adolescents ages 13–17 hospitalized for last-month suicide attempt and/or last-week suicidal ideation (76% female; mean age 15.5 years, SD=1.35), followed for 28 consecutive days after discharge; abstract reports n=652 observations.
- Procedures: daily surveys sent by text between 5pm and 7pm via Qualtrics/TelEMA; measures included daily suicidal ideation frequency, duration, and urge, plus connectedness, burdensomeness, and hopelessness; baseline suicidal ideation severity used the C-SSRS.
- Analysis: descriptive ICC/within-person variability; linear mixed effects models with random intercept and slope, controlling for pilot intervention group and previous-day suicidal ideation in next-day models; Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons.
Limitations
- Stated: the primarily female and Caucasian sample limits generalizability; survey adherence was 69% and may have been influenced by mood or other factors; single-item EMA measures need further validation; daily surveys have greater recall bias than multiple daily assessments; the study was not powered for between-person moderators; possible underreporting of suicidal thoughts, though daily diaries yielded more disclosure than an end-of-study assessment; and the measure did not assess suicidal intent, plans, or content variability.
- Evident: the small pilot sample (34 adolescents) and short 28-day follow-up limit precision and generalizability; findings may not extend to other high-risk adolescent populations or settings.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 43 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Synergistic effects of low connectedness with either high burdensomeness or high hopelessness were reliably associated with more severe same- and next-day suicidal ideation.
“However, synergistic effects of low connectedness with either high burdensomeness or high hopelessness were reliably associated with more severe same- and next-day suicidal ideation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All participants had at least one instance of suicidal ideation change by at least one within-person standard deviation from one day to the next.
“with all participants having at least one instance of suicidal ideation change by at least one within-person standard deviation from one day to the next day.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was notable variability in day-to-day suicidal ideation, with about half of ideation ratings changing at least one within-person standard deviation from one day to the next.
“There was notable variability in day-to-day suicidal ideation, with half of ideation ratings changing at least one within-person standard deviation from one day to the next.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A total of 24 (70.6%) individual participants endorsed suicidal ideation at least once across the 159 events.
“a total of 24 (70.6%) individual participants endorsed ideation at least once across these 159 events”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The proportion of any suicidal ideation disclosures was fairly consistent across the four weeks: 24.6% in week 1, 22.1% in week 2, 24% in week 3, and 27.3% in week 4.
“The proportion of disclosures of any suicidal ideation was fairly consistent across the four weeks: 24.6% in week 1 (n=46 events), 22.1% (n=38 events) in week 2, 24% (n=36 events) in week 3, and 27.3% (n=39 events) in week 4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Presence of any suicidal ideation was reported in 24.4% of all daily survey responses (n=159 days/events) over the 28-day follow-up.
“Presence of any suicidal ideation was reported in 24.4% of all responses (n=159 days or events) over the 28-day follow-up”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Mixed effects models revealed concurrent (same-day) associations between suicidal ideation (frequency, duration, urge) and well-established predictors (connectedness, burdensomeness, hopelessness).
“Results of mixed effects models revealed concurrent (same-day), but not short-term prospective (next-day), associations between suicidal ideation (frequency, duration, urge) and well-established predictors (connectedness, burdensomeness, hopelessness).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mixed effects models did not reveal short-term prospective (next-day) associations between suicidal ideation (frequency, duration, urge) and well-established predictors (connectedness, burdensomeness, hopelessness).
“Results of mixed effects models revealed concurrent (same-day), but not short-term prospective (next-day), associations between suicidal ideation (frequency, duration, urge) and well-established predictors (connectedness, burdensomeness, hopelessness).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
43%, 46%, and 47% of the variance in suicidal ideation frequency, duration, and urge, respectively, was due to within-person (day-to-day) variability.
“Specifically, 43%, 46%, and 47% of the variance in ideation frequency, duration, and urge, respectively, was due to within-person (1-ICC) variability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When examined prospectively and adjusting for previous-day suicidal ideation, only the combination of connectedness with burdensomeness was significantly associated with next-day suicidal ideation frequency, duration, and urge severity.
“However, when examined prospectively and adjusting for previous day suicidal ideation, only the combination of connectedness with burdensomeness was significantly associated with next-day suicidal ideation frequency, duration, and urge severity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When considered concurrently, all three two-way interactions between connectedness, burdensomeness, and hopelessness were significantly associated with suicidal ideation frequency, duration, and urge severity.
“When considered concurrently, all three two-way interactions were significantly associated with suicidal ideation frequency, duration, and urge severity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
About half of suicidal ideation ratings in this study changed at least one within-person standard deviation from one day to the next.
“In fact, about half of suicidal ideation ratings in this study changed at least one within-person standard deviation from one day to the next.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Low connectedness in combination with either high burdensomeness or high hopelessness was significantly associated with next-day suicidal ideation, even when controlling for previous-day suicidal ideation.
“Specifically, low connectedness in combination with either high burdensomeness or high hopelessness was significantly associated with next-day suicidal ideation, even when controlling for previous-day suicidal ideation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The combination of hopelessness and burdensomeness did not predict next-day ideation.
“The critical role of connectedness in these synergistic effects is further supported by our finding that the combination of hopelessness and burdensomeness did not predict next-day ideation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Approximately a third of connectedness, burdensomeness, and hopelessness ratings changed day-to-day by at least one within-person standard deviation.
“it is notable that the precursors to suicidal ideation examined in this study also varied considerably, with approximately a third of connectedness, burdensomeness, and hopelessness ratings changing day-to-day by at least one within-person standard deviation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Only previous-day suicidal ideation was independently associated with next-day ideation indicators.
“Only previous-day suicidal ideation was independently associated with next-day ideation indicators.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“In this study, previous-day suicidal ideation was also associated with next-day suicidal ideation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
The interaction between connectedness and hopelessness was significantly associated with next-day suicidal ideation frequency and duration.
“In addition, the interaction between connectedness and hopelessness was significantly associated with next-day suicidal ideation frequency and duration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The combination of high burdensomeness and high hopelessness was associated with increasing same-day suicidal ideation frequency, duration, and urge severity.
“Finally, as shown in Figure 3, the combination of high burdensomeness and high hopelessness was associated with increasing same-day suicidal ideation frequency, duration, and urge severity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Between 43% and 47% of the variance in suicidal ideation was due to within-person, or day-to-day, variability.
“We found that between 43% and 47% of the variance in suicidal ideation was due to within-person, or day-to-day, variability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The link between hopelessness and suicidal ideation and behavior is well-documented in previous work.
“Moreover, the link between hopelessness and suicidal ideation and behavior is also well-documented in previous work (e.g., Beck, Steer, Kovacs, & Garrison, 1985; Smith, Alloy, & Abramson, 2006; Steer, Kumar, & Beck, 1993; Mazza & Reynolds, 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Beck, Steer, Kovacs, & Garrison, 1985
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Smith, Alloy, & Abramson, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Steer, Kumar, & Beck, 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Known individual risk factors appear to have a modest relationship with suicidal thoughts and behavior according to recent meta-analytic studies.
“The importance of considering synergistic effects is also consistent with theoretical models of suicidal behavior and recent meta-analytic studies indicating that known individual risk factors appear to have a modest relationship with suicidal thoughts and behavior (Franklin et al., 2017; Ribeiro et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Franklin et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ribeiro et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The majority of existing studies focusing on suicidal ideation and suicide attempts have relied on longer assessment windows (weeks, months, years), with the average follow-up period being nearly 7 years.
“Given that the majority of existing studies focusing on suicidal ideation and suicide attempts have relied on longer assessment windows (weeks, months, years), with the average follow-up period being nearly 7 years (Ribeiro et al., 2016)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ribeiro et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Relying on longer time intervals between assessments has precluded gaining clinically relevant insight about who might be at imminent or acute suicide risk and when.
“In other words, relying on longer time intervals between assessments has precluded gaining clinically relevant insight about who might be at imminent or acute suicide risk and when (Bagge, Glenn, & Lee, 2013; Glenn & Nock, 2014; Rudd, et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bagge, Glenn, & Lee, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Glenn & Nock, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rudd, et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Recently discharged individuals are at increased risk for suicide.
“Recently discharged individuals are also at an increased risk for suicide (Chung et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chung et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
The primarily female and Caucasian sample limits generalizability of the results.
“The primarily female and Caucasian sample limits generalizability of the results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The combination of low connectedness and high burdensomeness predicting ideation is in line with IPTS and a number of studies.
“The combination of low connectedness and high burdensomeness predicting ideation is in line with IPTS (Joiner, 2005; Van Orden et al., 2010) as well as a number of studies (Chu et al., 2017; Opperman et al., 2015; Stewart et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Joiner, 2005; Van Orden et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Chu et al., 2017; Opperman et al., 2015; Stewart et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Greater severity of suicidal ideation is a strong indicator of ideation the following day, despite fluctuating day-to-day.
“This suggests that, despite fluctuating day-to-day, greater severity of suicidal ideation is a strong indicator of ideation the following day.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Ben-Zeev et al. (2012) found no relationship between hopelessness and near-term ideation.
“This is consistent with Ben-Zeev et al. (2012) who found no relationship between hopelessness and near-term ideation as well as with Kleiman and colleagues’ study (2017) where only suicidal ideation (but not hopelessness, loneliness, or burdensomeness) predicted short-term changes in suicidal ideation assessed multiple times per day.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ben-Zeev et al. (2012)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
This finding contributes to the growing body of literature suggesting that suicidal ideation is dynamic over short periods of time.
“Thus, this finding contributes to the growing body of literature suggesting that suicidal ideation is dynamic over short periods of time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
This study was not sufficiently powered to consider between-person moderators of repeatedly-assessed experiences, such as sex, gender identity, and clinical characteristics (e.g., attempt history).
“This study was also not sufficiently powered to consider between-person moderators of repeatedly-assessed experiences, such as sex, gender identify, and clinical characteristics (e.g., attempt history).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Particular combinations of risk indicators predicted next-day suicidal thoughts.
“While not associated independently, our findings indicate that particular combinations of risk indicators predicted next-day suicidal thoughts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 26
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataApproximately a third of connectedness, burdensomeness, and hopelessness ratings differed from one day to the next by at least one within-person standard deviation: 33.9% for connectedness, 34.5% for burdensomeness, and 32.4% for hopelessness.
“Approximately a third of connectedness, burdensomeness, and hopelessness ratings differed from one day to the next by at least one within-person standard deviation: 33.9% (173/510) for connectedness, 34.5% (176/510) for burdensomeness, and 32.4% (166/512) for hopelessness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor suicidal ideation frequency, duration, and urge, 54.7%, 44%, and 43.3% of daily ideation ratings, respectively, changed from one day to the next by at least one within-person standard deviation from participants' individual mean.
“Specifically, for suicidal ideation frequency, duration, and urge, 54.7% (n=235/519), 44% (n=229/520), and 43.3% (n=225/520) of daily ideation ratings, respectively, changed from one day to the next day by at least one standard deviation from participants’ individual mean.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWithin-person variability for connectedness, burdensomeness, and hopelessness was 37%, 31%, and 33%, respectively.
“The within-person or day-to-day variability for connectedness, burdensomeness, and hopelessness ranged, respectively, from 37% to 31% to 33%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataParticipants' levels of connectedness, burdensomeness, and hopelessness changed from one day to the next, but less so than suicidal ideation.
“Participants’ levels of connectedness, burdensomeness, and hopelessness also changed from one day to the next consecutive day, however less so than for suicidal ideation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNearly all participants had at least one instance of day-to-day change in connectedness (100%), burdensomeness (94.1%), and hopelessness (97.1%) by at least one within-person standard deviation.
“Nearly all participants had at least one instance of day-to-day change in these variables (100% for connectedness; 94.1% for burdensomeness; 97.1% for hopelessness) by at least one within-person standard deviation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe sample was 76.5% female, with a mean age of 15.5 years (SD=1.35).
“The sample’s sex distribution included 76.5% (n=26) female adolescents, with a mean age of 15.5 years (SD=1.35).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe average baseline suicidal ideation severity (range 0-5) was 4.06 (SD=0.92).
“The average baseline suicidal ideation severity (range 0–5) was 4.06 (SD=0.92).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen either burdensomeness or hopelessness were high, higher levels of connectedness were associated with decreasing same-day suicidal ideation, and the same pattern emerged for next-day suicidal ideation.
“As shown in Figure 3 (online supplemental materials), when either burdensomeness or hopelessness were high, presence of higher levels of connectedness was associated with decreasing same-day suicidal ideation; the same pattern emerged when interactions were plotted for next-day suicidal ideation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt baseline, 52.9% of teens had a previous suicide attempt; 32.4% attempted within a month of hospitalization.
“At baseline, 52.9% (n=18) of the teens had a previous suicide attempt; 32.4% (n=11) attempted within a month of hospitalization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn mixed effects models, lower connectedness, greater burdensomeness, and higher hopelessness had statistically significant concurrent associations with suicidal ideation outcomes, but not short-term prospective associations.
“Results from mixed effects models (Table 2) indicate statistically significant concurrent, but not short-term prospective, relationships between suicidal ideation outcomes and lower connectedness, greater burdensomeness, and higher hopelessness.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Additional findings that warrant discussion include the fact that, despite significant concurrent associations, connectedness, burdensomeness, and hopelessness were not significant predictors of next-day suicidal ideation indicators when accounting for previous-day suicidal ideation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataApproximately a third (32.4%; n=11) of the sample had at least one previous psychiatric hospitalization.
“Approximately a third (32.4%; n=11) of the sample had at least one previous psychiatric hospitalization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the authors' previous study of adolescents followed daily for a month following psychiatric hospitalization, daily assessments of suicidal ideation in the post-discharge period were feasible, acceptable to adolescents, and resulted in more teens reporting thoughts of suicide compared to an end-of-study assessment.
“In our previous study of adolescents who were followed daily for a month following psychiatric hospitalization, we learned that daily assessments of suicidal ideation in the critical post-discharge period were feasible, acceptable to adolescents, and resulted in more teens reporting thoughts of suicide compared to an end-of-study assessment (Czyz, King, Nahum-Shani, 2018b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Czyz, King, Nahum-Shani, 2018b
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe Brief Hopelessness Scale item used has sound psychometrics and is comparable to the full measure of hopelessness.
“This item was from the 6-item Brief Hopelessness Scale (Bolland, McCallum, Lian, Bailey, & Rowan, 2001), adapted from the Hopelessness Scale for Children (Kazdin, Rodgers, & Colbus, 1986). The measure has sound psychometrics and is comparable to the full measure of hopelessness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bolland, McCallum, Lian, Bailey, & Rowan, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kazdin, Rodgers, & Colbus, 1986
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIPTS proposes that the combination of low connectedness and high burdensomeness leads to suicidal desire, which has been supported by previous research among adults and teens.
“IPTS proposes that the combination of these two factors leads to suicidal desire, which has been supported by previous research among adults and teens (Chu et al., 2017; Opperman, Czyz, Gipson, & King, 2015; Stewart, Eaddy, Horton, Hughes, & Kennard, 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Chu et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Opperman, Czyz, Gipson, & King, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Stewart, Eaddy, Horton, Hughes, & Kennard, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis study adds to emerging literature indicating that suicidal thoughts fluctuate considerably among individuals at risk for suicide, and extends it by focusing on adolescents in the critical post-hospitalization period.
“This study adds to emerging literature indicating that suicidal thoughts fluctuate considerably among individuals at risk for suicide, further extending it by focusing on adolescents in the critical post-hospitalization period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationEMA data collection is feasible for repeated assessment of suicide risk-related constructs.
“Existing studies involving repeated assessment of suicide risk-related constructs have demonstrated that EMA data collection is feasible (Davidson, Anestis, & Gutierrez, 2017)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davidson, Anestis, & Gutierrez, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnly one EMA study (Nock et al., 2009) has assessed suicidal ideation in adolescents (ages 12-19), but participants were recruited from the community and reported relatively infrequent suicidal ideation over the two-week follow-up period.
“To our knowledge, only one EMA study (Nock et al., 2009) has assessed suicidal ideation in adolescents (ages 12–19), however participants were recruited from the community and reported relatively infrequent suicidal ideation over the two-week follow-up period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nock et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn two adult samples of previous suicide attempters and psychiatric inpatients, hopelessness, burdensomeness, and loneliness had strong associations with concurrent suicidal ideation, but these risk factors were not associated with next-assessment suicidal ideation when controlling for suicidal ideation at the previous assessment.
“Similarly, in two adult samples of previous suicide attempters and psychiatric inpatients, Kleiman et al. (2017) found that while hopelessness, burdensomeness, and loneliness had strong associations with concurrent suicidal ideation, these risk factors were not associated with next-assessment suicidal ideation when controlling for suicidal ideation at the previous assessment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kleiman et al. (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationHopelessness is conceptualized as both central and proximal to the emergence of suicidal ideation in a cognitive framework.
“Our focus on hopelessness, defined as negative expectations about the future, is guided by a cognitive framework (Wenzel & Beck, 2008) wherein hopelessness is conceptualized as both central and proximal to the emergence of suicidal ideation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wenzel & Beck, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe post-discharge period for psychiatrically hospitalized teens is often characterized by ongoing suicide risk-related crises and fluctuating risk patterns.
“The need to fill these knowledge gaps is especially critical for psychiatrically hospitalized teens, as the post-discharge period is often characterized by ongoing suicide risk-related crises (Brent et al., 2013; Czyz, Berona, & King, 2016; Goldston et al., 1999; Yen et al., 2013) and fluctuating risk patterns (Czyz & King, 2015; Prinstein et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Brent et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Czyz, Berona, & King, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Goldston et al., 1999
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior (IPTS) conceptualizes suicidal desire as arising from low levels of social connectedness (thwarted belongingness) and perception that one is a burden on others (burdensomeness).
“Our focus on connectedness and burdensomeness is informed by the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior (IPTS) (Joiner, 2015; Van Orden et al., 2010), wherein suicidal desire is conceptualized as arising from low levels of social connectedness (i.e. thwarted belongingness) and perception that one is a burden on others (burdensomeness).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Joiner, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Van Orden et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRepeated assessment of suicidal thoughts was not associated with any iatrogenic increase in suicidal thinking.
“and that repeated assessment of suicidal thoughts was not associated with any iatrogenic increase in suicidal thinking (Husky et al., 2014; Law et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Husky et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Law et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) has strong psychometric properties in adult and adolescent samples.
“These two questions were derived from the 15-item Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) (Van Orden, Cukrowicz, Witte, & Joiner, 2012) measuring thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness. The INQ has strong psychometric properties in adult and adolescent samples (Hill et al., 2015; Van Orden et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hill et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Van Orden et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAdditional EMA studies with adults have indicated that suicidal thoughts are dynamic over short periods of time, sometimes fluctuating over an interval of only a few hours.
“Additional EMA studies with adults have indicated that suicidal thoughts are dynamic over short periods of time, sometimes fluctuating over an interval of only a few hours (Hallensleben et al., 2018; Kleiman et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hallensleben et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kleiman et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) has shown strong reliability and validity, including predictive validity for suicide attempts.
“The C-SSRS assesses a range of suicidal thoughts and behaviors, and it has shown strong reliability and validity (Posner et al., 2011), including predictive validity for suicide attempts (Gipson, Agarwala, Opperman, Horwitz, & King, 2015; Horwitz, Czyz, & King, 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Posner et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gipson, Agarwala, Opperman, Horwitz, & King, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Horwitz, Czyz, & King, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataLow connectedness together with high hopelessness was also associated with next-day suicidal ideation, pointing to multiple proximal pathways to suicidal ideation.
“Moving beyond IPTS, however, it is noteworthy that low connectedness together with high hopelessness was also associated with next-day suicidal ideation, pointing to multiple proximal pathways to suicidal ideation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: A sense of burdensomeness may contribute to hopelessness, and hopelessness is a broader construct that may reflect struggles in interpersonal and/or non-interpersonal domains.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKleiman and colleagues (2017), in two samples of adults responding to four surveys per day, reported that 33% and 47% of variance was accounted for by within-person variability.
“This is consistent with previous work conducted by Kleiman and colleagues (2017) who, in two samples of adults responding to four surveys per day, reported that 33% and 47% of variance was accounted for by within-person variability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kleiman and colleagues (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataLow connectedness, together with elevated sense of burdensomeness or hopelessness, appears to represent an especially risky state for both the emergence of suicidal ideation and its persistence into the next day.
“With implications for our understanding of suicide risk, low connectedness, together with elevated sense of burdensomeness or hopelessness, appears to represent an especially risky state for not only the emergence of suicidal ideation but also its persistence into the next day.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataThe time-dependent relationship between suicidal thoughts and individual risk factors examined in this study points to the possibility that the dynamic nature of these constructs may require even more fine-grained assessment to improve short-term prediction.
“Finally, the time-dependent relationship between suicidal thoughts and individual risk factors examined in this study points to the possibility that the dynamic nature of these constructs may require even more fine-grained assessment in order to improve short-term prediction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIPTS theory conceptualizes connectedness, burdensomeness, and hopelessness as dynamic.
“In line with IPTS theory, which conceptualizes these as dynamic (Van Orden et al., 2010), it is notable that the precursors to suicidal ideation examined in this study also varied considerably, with approximately a third of connectedness, burdensomeness, and hopelessness ratings changing day-to-day by at least one within-person standard deviation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Orden et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll mixed effects models included a random intercept and slope and controlled for any group effects because the data came from a pilot intervention study.
“All models included a random intercept and slope and, because the data came from a pilot intervention study, also controlled for any group effects1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKleiman and colleagues' study (2017) found that only suicidal ideation (but not hopelessness, loneliness, or burdensomeness) predicted short-term changes in suicidal ideation assessed multiple times per day.
“This is consistent with Ben-Zeev et al. (2012) who found no relationship between hopelessness and near-term ideation as well as with Kleiman and colleagues’ study (2017) where only suicidal ideation (but not hopelessness, loneliness, or burdensomeness) predicted short-term changes in suicidal ideation assessed multiple times per day.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kleiman and colleagues’ study (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataThe dynamic nature of suicidal ideation observed in this study converges with clinical recommendations to closely monitor ideation in the post-discharge period.
“The dynamic nature of suicidal ideation observed in this study also converges with clinical recommendations to closely monitor ideation in the post-discharge period, although much more work is needed to address critical issues related to the feasibility of clinical implementation of more frequent monitoring.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis study adds to the growing literature suggesting that suicidal thoughts fluctuate considerably, highlighting the value of EMA methods.
“Taken together, this study adds to the growing literature suggesting that suicidal thoughts fluctuate considerably, thus highlighting the value of EMA methods in providing a more nuanced understanding of when these thoughts occur as well as the associated contextual factors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataNext-day models controlled for previous-day suicidal ideation corresponding to the outcome.
“All models included the three predictors, and next-day models also controlled for previous-day suicidal ideation corresponding to the outcome (e.g., for next-day duration, previous-day duration was controlled for).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe measure of suicidal thoughts used in this study did not assess suicidal intent or plans, or variability in the content of suicidal thoughts.
“Finally, the measure of suicidal thoughts used in this study did not assess suicidal intent or plans, or, more generally, variability in the content of suicidal thoughts, which could be important to our understanding of transitions in suicidal thinking and precursors to suicidal behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationThe study adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure with a 0.05 false positive discovery rate.
“To adjust for multiple comparisons, we applied the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure (Benjamini & Hochberg, 1995) with a 0.05 false positive discovery rate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Benjamini & Hochberg, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningSurvey adherence (69%) may be a limitation, as it is not possible to rule out that adherence may have been influenced by relevant mood states or factors.
“Although comparable to EMA studies of similar length (e.g., 62.0% reported by Kleiman et al., 2017; 77.8% reported by Torous et al., 2015), survey adherence (69%) may be another limitation, as it is not possible to rule out that adherence may have been influenced by relevant mood states or factors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kleiman et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Torous et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe time-dependent relationships may reflect the dynamic, state-like nature of these constructs, and hopelessness, burdensomeness, and connectedness may be limited in predicting short-term suicidal ideation.
“These time-dependent relationships may be reflective of the dynamic, or state-like, nature of these constructs and, while contrary to what might be expected based on theory and evidence found in existing literature, it may be that hopelessness, burdensomeness, and connectedness are limited in predicting short-term suicidal ideation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSurvey adherence: participants responded to 654 (69.4%) and completed 650 (68.9%) surveys during the 28-day period; on average, participants completed 19.12 (SD=7.07) surveys.
“With regard to survey adherence, participants responded to 654 (69.4%) and completed 650 (68.9%) surveys during the 28-day period. On average, participants completed 19.12 (SD=7.07) surveys.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenDaily surveys employed in this study are subject to greater recall bias relative to multiple daily assessments.
“Daily surveys employed in this study are subject to greater recall bias relative to multiple daily assessments, which would have the advantage of providing even more fine-grained information about teens’ experiences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
There is limited information about the extent to which suicidal ideation and its precursors change over short periods of time among adolescents in the post-discharge period.
“Given limited information about the extent to which suicidal ideation and its precursors change over short periods of time among adolescents in the post-discharge period, we also examined day-to-day variability in suicidal ideation as well as connectedness, burdensomeness, and hopelessness.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most studies ask about severity of suicidal ideation as well as risk indicators over longer time intervals that may not capture short-term changes or states.
“This pattern of variability is worth noting because most studies ask about severity of suicidal ideation as well as risk indicators over longer time intervals that may not capture these changes or states, which, in turn, could be critical to improving risk detection.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
This is the first study employing fine-grained (i.e. daily) assessments among discharged adolescents to understand the dynamic nature of these phenomena and short-term prediction of suicidal ideation.
“To our knowledge, this is the first study employing fine-grained (i.e. daily) assessments among discharged adolescents to understand the dynamic nature of these phenomena and short-term prediction of suicidal ideation.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
This study is the first to provide evidence supporting the importance of these two theory components to our understanding of suicidal ideation or desire using a short-term prospective design.
“However, to our knowledge, this study is the first to provide evidence supporting the importance of these two theory components to our understanding of suicidal ideation or desire using a short-term prospective design.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A sense of burdensomeness may contribute to hopelessness, and hopelessness is a broader construct that may reflect struggles in interpersonal and/or non-interpersonal domains.
“Although a sense of burdensomeness may contribute to hopelessness, hopelessness is a broader construct that may reflect struggles in interpersonal and/or non-interpersonal domains.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most individuals in the reviewed studies experienced substantial variability in suicidal ideation both between days and within days.
“Most individuals experienced substantial variability in suicidal ideation both between- (55) and within-days (47, 56, 58).”
From Don't Miss the Moment: A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Suicide Research (2022) · cites this paper as [55]
Risk factors (negative affect, hopelessness, loneliness, burdensomeness, connectedness, thwarted belongingness) occurred with similar variability and were concurrently associated with suicidal ideation.
“Risk factors (negative affect, hopelessness, loneliness, burdensomeness, connectedness, thwarted belongingness) occurred with similar variability, and were concurrently associated with suicidal ideation (47, 55, 56, 68, 78).”
From Don't Miss the Moment: A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Suicide Research (2022) · cites this paper as [55]
Most reports failed to establish independent temporal predictors of suicidal ideation severity: of twelve articles fitting temporal prediction models, four failed to establish significant predictors after accounting for ideation at the previous time point, and five did not control for prior ideation.
“Most reports failed to establish independent temporal predictors of suicidal ideation severity: of twelve articles fitting temporal prediction models (47, 51, 52, 55–57, 60, 73, 74, 76, 77), four failed to establish significant predictors after accounting for ideation at the previous time point (47, 52, 55), and five did not control for prior ideation (51, 60, 73, 74, 76).”
From Don't Miss the Moment: A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Suicide Research (2022) · cites this paper as [55]
Studies examining day-to-day rather than within-day changes in suicidal ideation were less likely to report positive findings.
“Studies examining day-to-day rather than within-day changes in suicidal ideation were less likely to report positive findings (55, 80).”
From Don't Miss the Moment: A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Suicide Research (2022) · cites this paper as [55]
In three studies following adolescents recently discharged from inpatient treatment after a suicide attempt or severe ideation, the incidence of suicide attempts over 28 days was 6%, 8%, and 9%.
“Three studies followed adolescents who were recently discharged from inpatient treatment after a suicide attempt or severe ideation. In 28 days, the incidence of suicide attempts was 6% (55), 8% (72), and 9% (85).”
From Don't Miss the Moment: A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Suicide Research (2022) · cites this paper as [55]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Not every participant could have had a change in suicidal ideation
MinorOnly 24 of the 34 participants endorsed ideation at least once. Participants who never endorsed ideation could not have had a day-to-day change in its reported frequency, duration, or urge, contrary to the claim about all participants.
“with all participants having at least one instance of suicidal ideation change by at least one within-person standard deviation from one day to the next day.”
“a total of 24 (70.6%) individual participants endorsed ideation at least once across these 159 events.”
Ideation-frequency change percentage does not match its count
MinorThe stated 235 of 519 ratings is 45.3%, not 54.7%.
Reported 54.7 · recomputed 45.279383
“54.7% (n=235/519)”
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482 · see citing works
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454 · see citing works
The interpersonal theory of suicide.
Van Orden, K. A., Witte, T. K., Cukrowicz, K. C., Braithwaite, S. R., Selby, E. A., & Joiner, T. E. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0018697 · Cited by 5,292 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Our focus on connectedness and burdensomeness is informed by the interpersonalpsychological theory of suicidal behavior (IPTS) (Joiner, 2015; Van Orden et al., 2010), wherein suicidal desire is conceptualized as arising from low levels of social connectedness (i.e. thwarted belongingness) and…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialPosner, K., Brown, G. K., Stanley, B., Brent, D. A., Yershova, K. V., Oquendo, M. A., Currier, G. W., Melvin, G. A., Greenhill, L., Shen, S., et al. (2011) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704 · Cited by 5,157 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The C-SSRS assesses a range of suicidal thoughts and behaviors, and it has shown strong reliability and validity (Posner et al., 2011), including predictive validity for suicide attempts (Gipson, Agarwala, Opperman, Horwitz, & King, 2015; Horwitz, Czyz, & King, 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRisk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research
Franklin, J. C., Ribeiro, J. D., Fox, K. R., Bentley, K. H., Kleiman, E. M., Huang, X., Musacchio, K. M., Jaroszewski, A. C., Chang, B. P., & Nock, M. K. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000084 · Cited by 3,784 · see citing works
Joiner, T. E. (2007) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjghv2f · Cited by 2,891 · see citing works
Youth risk behavior surveillance-United States, 2017
Kann, L., McManus, T., Harris, W. A., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., Queen, B., Lowry, R., Chyen, D., Whittle, L., Thornton, J., et al. (2018) · MMWR. Surveillance Summaries · doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6708a1 · Cited by 2,502 · see citing works
Nahum-Shani, I., Smith, S. N., Spring, B. J., Collins, L. M., Witkiewitz, K., Tewari, A., & Murphy, S. A. (2018) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-016-9830-8 · Cited by 2,171 · see citing works
Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS)
:unav (2009) · Harvard Dataverse · doi:10.7910/dvn/n8emxe · Cited by 1,803 · see citing works
(1985) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.142.5.559 · Cited by 1,723 · see citing works
Orden, K. A. V., Cukrowicz, K. C., Witte, T. K., & Joiner, T. E. (2011) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0025358 · Cited by 1,415 · see citing works
Adolescent suicide and suicidal behavior
Bridge, J. A., Goldstein, T. R., & Brent, D. A. (2006) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01615.x · Cited by 1,361 · see citing works
Ribeiro, J. D., Franklin, J. C., Fox, K. R., Bentley, K. H., Kleiman, E. M., Chang, B. P., & Nock, M. K. (2016) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291715001804 · Cited by 1,346 · see citing works
Chu, C., Buchman-Schmitt, J. M., Stanley, I. H., Hom, M. A., Tucker, R. P., Hagan, C. R., Rogers, M. L., Podlogar, M. C., Chiurliza, B., Ringer, F. B., et al. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000123 · Cited by 1,231 · cited 2× · see citing works
“IPTS proposes that the combination of these two factors leads to suicidal desire, which has been supported by previous research among adults and teens (Chu et al., 2017; Opperman, Czyz, Gipson, & King, 2015; Stewart, Eaddy, Horton, Hughes, & Kennard, 2017).”
ResultKleiman, E. M., Turner, B. J., Fedor, S., Beale, E. E., Huffman, J. C., & Nock, M. K. (2017) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000273 · Cited by 831 · see citing works
Nock, M. K., Prinstein, M. J., & Sterba, S. K. (2009) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016948 · Cited by 662 · see citing works
Suicide Rates After Discharge From Psychiatric Facilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Chung, D. T., Ryan, C. J., Hadzi-Pavlovic, D., Singh, S. P., Stanton, C., & Large, M. M. (2017) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1044 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
Nahum-Shani, I., Hekler, E. B., & Spruijt-Metz, D. (2015) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000306 · Cited by 568 · see citing works
Warning signs for suicide: theory, research, and clinical applications
Rudd, M. D., Berman, A. L., Joiner, T. E., Nock, M. K., Silverman, M. M., Mandrusiak, M., Van Orden, K., & Witte, T. (2006) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1521/suli.2006.36.3.255 · Cited by 548 · see citing works
A cognitive model of suicidal behavior: theory and treatment
Wenzel, A., & Beck, A. T. (2008) · Applied and Preventive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appsy.2008.05.001 · Cited by 491 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…uthor M anuscript A uthor M anuscript A uthor M anuscript Our focus on hopelessness, defined as negative expectations about the future, is guided by a cognitive framework (Wenzel & Beck, 2008) wherein hopelessness is conceptualized as both central and proximal to the emergence of suicidal ideation.”
The Hopelessness Scale for Children: Psychometric characteristics and concurrent validity.
Kazdin, A. E., Rodgers, A. Y., & Colbus, D. (1986) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.54.2.241 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Moskowitz, D. S., & Young, S. N. (2006) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1139/jpn.0602 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Prinstein, M. J., Nock, M. K., Simon, V., Aikins, J. W., Cheah, C. S. L., & Spirito, A. (2008) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.76.1.92 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
The hopelessness scale for children: psychometric characteristics and concurrent validity
Kazdin, A. E., Rodgers, A., & Colbus, D. (1986) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.54.2.241 · Cited by 396 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This item was selected because it had strong factor loading as well as item-total scale correlation (Kazdin et al., 1986).”
MethodGlobal trends in teenage suicide: 2003–2014
McLoughlin, A., Gould, M. S., & Malone, K. M. (2015) · QJM · doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcv026 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Improving the Short-Term Prediction of Suicidal Behavior
Glenn, C. R., & Nock, M. K. (2014) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2014.06.004 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Attempted and Completed Suicide in Adolescence
Spirito, A., & Esposito-Smythers, C. L. (2005) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095323 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Smith, J. M., Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (2006) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1521/suli.2006.36.4.443 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Torous, J., Staples, P., Shanahan, M., Lin, C., Peck, P., Keshavan, M., & Onnela, J.-P. (2015) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.3889 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Hill, R. M., Rey, Y., Marin, C. E., Sharp, C., Green, K. L., & Pettit, J. W. (2014) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12129 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Protecting Adolescents From Self-Harm: A Critical Review of Intervention Studies
Brent, D. A., McMakin, D. L., Kennard, B. D., Goldstein, T. R., Mayes, T. L., & Douaihy, A. B. (2013) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.09.009 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
GOLDSTON, D. B., DANIEL, S. S., REBOUSSIN, D. M., REBOUSSIN, B. A., FRAZIER, P. H., & KELLEY, A. E. (1999) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199906000-00012 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
The Validity of the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide in Adolescence: A Review
Stewart, S. M., Eaddy, M., Horton, S. E., Hughes, J. L., & Kennard, B. D. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2015.1020542 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Digital phenotyping of suicidal thoughts
Kleiman, E. M., Turner, B. J., Fedor, S., Beale, E. E., Picard, R. W., Huffman, J. C., & Nock, M. K. (2018) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.22730 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Horwitz, A. G., Czyz, E. K., & King, C. A. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2014.910789 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Self-citationColumbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale
Gipson, P. Y., Agarwala, P., Opperman, K. J., Horwitz, A. G., & King, C. A. (2014) · Pediatric Emergency Care · doi:10.1097/pec.0000000000000225 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantifying the impact of recent negative life events on suicide attempts
Bagge, C. L., Glenn, C. R., & Lee, H.-J. (2013) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030371 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Mazza, J. J., & Reynolds, W. M. (1998) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/j.1943-278x.1998.tb00972.x · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Czyz, E. K., & King, C. A. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2013.836454 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Self-citationProspective predictors of adolescent suicidality: 6-month post-hospitalization follow-up
Yen, S., Weinstock, L. M., Andover, M. S., Sheets, E. S., Selby, E. A., & Spirito, A. (2013) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291712001912 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Czyz, E. K., Liu, Z., & King, C. A. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2012.651998 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationSelf-reported suicidal ideation in adolescent psychiatric inpatients.
Steer, R. A., Kumar, G., & Beck, A. T. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.61.6.1096 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Kaminski, J. W., Puddy, R. W., Hall, D. M., Cashman, S. Y., Crosby, A. E., & Ortega, L. (2009) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-009-9472-2 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Hallensleben, N., Spangenberg, L., Forkmann, T., Rath, D., Hegerl, U., Kersting, A., Kallert, T. W., & Glaesmer, H. (2018) · Crisis · doi:10.1027/0227-5910/a000464 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Feasibility and validity of ecological momentary assessment in the investigation of suicide risk
Husky, M., Olié, E., Guillaume, S., Genty, C., Swendsen, J., & Courtet, P. (2014) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2014.08.019 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Real-time predictors of suicidal ideation: mobile assessment of hospitalized depressed patients
Ben-Zeev, D., Young, M. A., & Depp, C. A. (2012) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2011.11.025 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Czyz, E. K., King, C. A., & Nahum-Shani, I. (2018) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2018.06.031 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationEcological momentary assessment is a neglected methodology in suicidology
Davidson, C. L., Anestis, M. D., & Gutierrez, P. M. (2017) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2015.1004482 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Czyz, E. K., King, C. A., & Biermann, B. J. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2018.1496442 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationHopelessness and Violence Among Inner-City Youths
Bolland, J. M., McCallum, D. M., Lian, B. E., Bailey, C. J., & Rowan, P. J. (2001) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1023/a:1013028805470 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-reported suicidal ideation in adolescent psychiatric inpatients.
Steer, R. A., Kumar, G., & Beck, A. T. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.61.6.1096 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Husky, M., Swendsen, J., Ionita, A., Jaussent, I., Genty, C., & Courtet, P. (2017) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.035 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Arango, A., Cole-Lewis, Y., Lindsay, R. G., Yegüez, C. E., Clark, M. J., & King, C. A. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2018.1443456 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationDoes assessing suicidality frequently and repeatedly cause harm? a randomized control study
Law, M. K., Furr, R. M., Arnold, E. M., Mneimne, M., Jaquett, C., & Fleeson, W. (2015) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000118 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Opperman, K. J., Czyz, E. K., Gipson, P. Y., & King, C. A. (2015) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2014.957451 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationCzyz, E. K., Berona, J., & King, C. A. (2016) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201400252 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationTelEMA: a low-cost and user-friendly telephone assessment platform
Fernandez, K. C., Johnson, M. R., & Rodebaugh, T. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0287-9 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Annual Research Review: Ecological momentary assessment studies in child psychology and psychiatry
Russell, M. A., & Gajos, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13204 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Hallensleben (2019) · doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.11.003 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Don't Miss the Moment: A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Suicide Research
Kivelä, L., van der Does, W. A. J., Riese, H., & Antypa, N. (2022) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2022.876595 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Use of Ecological Momentary Assessment to Study Suicidal Thoughts and Behavior: a Systematic Review
Sedano-Capdevila, A., Porras-Segovia, A., Bello, H. J., Baca-García, E., & Barrigon, M. L. (2021) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-021-01255-7 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Wang, S. B., Coppersmith, D. D. L., Kleiman, E. M., Bentley, K. H., Millner, A. J., Fortgang, R., Mair, P., Dempsey, W., Huffman, J. C., & Nock, M. K. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0591 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Kuehn, K. S., Dora, J., Harned, M. S., Foster, K. T., Song, F., Smith, M. R., & King, K. M. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01340-8 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Glenn, C. R., Kleiman, E. M., Kandlur, R., Esposito, E. C., & Liu, R. T. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2021.1969654 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Highly variable suicidal ideation: a phenotypic marker for stress induced suicide risk
Oquendo, M. A., Galfalvy, H. C., Choo, T.-H., Kandlur, R., Burke, A. K., Sublette, M. E., Miller, J. M., Mann, J. J., & Stanley, B. H. (2021) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-020-0819-0 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Kleiman, E. M., Glenn, C. R., & Liu, R. T. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2019.1666400 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Using intensive time sampling methods to capture daily suicidal ideation: A systematic review
Ammerman, B. A., & Law, K. C. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.121 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Hamilton, J. L., Tsypes, A., Zelazny, J., Sewall, C. J. R., Rode, N., Merranko, J., Brent, D. A., Goldstein, T. R., & Franzen, P. L. (2023) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13651 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Czyz, E. K., King, C. A., Al‐Dajani, N., Zimmermann, L., Hong, V., & Nahum-Shani, I. B. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28005 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationKirshenbaum, J. S., Pagliaccio, D., Bitran, A., Xu, E., & Auerbach, R. P. (2024) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-024-02914-y · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Czyz, E. K., Glenn, C. R., Busby, D. R., & King, C. A. (2019) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112588 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationCzyz, E. K., Koo, H. J., Al‐Dajani, N., King, C. A., & Nahum-Shani, I. (2021) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291721005006 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationInterpersonal theory of suicide: prospective examination
Forkmann, T., Glaesmer, H., Paashaus, L., Rath, D., Schönfelder, A., Stengler, K., Juckel, G., Assion, H., & Teismann, T. (2020) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjo.2020.93 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Tsai, M. V., Lari, H., Saffy, S., & Klonsky, E. D. (2020) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2020.08.007 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Can passive measurement of physiological distress help better predict suicidal thinking?
Kleiman, E. M., Bentley, K. H., Maimone, J. S., Lee, H.-I., Kilbury, E. N., Fortgang, R. G., Zuromski, K. L., Huffman, J. C., & Nock, M. K. (2021) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-021-01730-y · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Characteristics of Suicidal Ideation: A Systematic Review
Reeves, K. W., Vasconez, G., & Weiss, S. J. (2022) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2021.2022551 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Rabasco, A., & Sheehan, K. G. (2021) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2021.1903635 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Heterogeneity in suicide risk: Evidence from personalized dynamic models
Coppersmith, D. D. L., Kleiman, E. M., Millner, A. J., Wang, S. B., Arizmendi, C., Bentley, K. H., DeMarco, D., Fortgang, R. G., Zuromski, K. L., Maimone, J. S., et al. (2024) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2024.104574 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Czyz, E. K., Koo, H. J., Al‐Dajani, N., Kentopp, S. D., Jiang, A., & King, C. A. (2022) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.06.050 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationHamilton, J. L., Dalack, M. N., Boyd, S. I., Jorgensen, S. L., Dreier, M. J., Sarna, J., & Brent, D. A. (2024) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13996 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Horwitz, A. G., Czyz, E. K., Al‐Dajani, N., Dempsey, W., Zhao, Z., Nahum-Shani, I. B., & Sen, S. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.06.064 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationWolford‐Clevenger, C., Stuart, G. L., Elledge, L. C., McNulty, J. K., & Spirito, A. (2019) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12585 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Jacobucci, R., McClure, K. E., & Ammerman, B. A. (2022) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12933 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Saving Lives: Recognizing and Intervening with Youth at Risk for Suicide
Arango, A., Gipson, P. Y., Votta, J. G., & King, C. A. (2021) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-103740 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationCzyz, E. K., Yap, J., King, C., & Nahum-Shani, I. (2020) · Assessment (Odessa, Fla.) · doi:10.1177/1073191120939168 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationSelecting an Ecological Momentary Assessment Platform: Tutorial for Researchers
Henry, L. M., Hansen, E., Chimoff, J., Pokstis, K., Kiderman, M., Naim, R., Kossowsky, J., Byrne, M. E., López-Guzmán, S., Kircanski, K., et al. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/51125 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Relevance of the interpersonal theory of suicide in an adolescent psychiatric inpatient population
King, C. D., Joyce, V. W., Kleiman, E. M., Buonopane, R. J., Millner, A. J., & Nash, C. C. (2019) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112590 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationAl-Dajani, N., & Uliaszek, A. A. (2021) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114027 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
24-hour warning signs for adolescent suicide attempts
King, C. A., Gipson Allen, P. Y., Ahamed, S. I., Webb, M., Casper, T. C., Brent, D., Grupp-Phelan, J., Rogers, T. A., Arango, A., Al-Dajani, N., et al. (2024) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291723003112 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationJanssens, J. J., Kiekens, G., Jaeken, M., & Kirtley, O. J. (2024) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102467 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Winstone, L., Heron, J., John, A. M., Kirtley, O. J., Moran, P., Muehlenkamp, J. J., O’Connor, R. C., & Mars, B. (2024) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/63132 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
van Ballegooijen, W., Littlewood, D. L., Nielsen, E., Kapur, N., & Gooding, P. A. (2022) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjo.2022.68 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Intensive Longitudinal Assessment of Adolescents to Predict Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors
Auerbach, R. P., Lan, R., Galfalvy, H., Alqueza, K. L., Cohn, J. F., Crowley, R. N., Durham, K., Joyce, K. J., Kahn, L. E., Kamath, R. A., et al. (2023) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2023.03.018 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Bai, S., Babeva, K. N., Kim, M. I., & Asarnow, J. R. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2020.1815208 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Esposito, E. C., Duan, A., Kearns, J. C., Kleiman, E. M., Conwell, Y., & Glenn, C. R. (2022) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-022-00907-3 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Al‐Dajani, N., & Czyz, E. K. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2022.2051525 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationTesting the interpersonal theory of suicide in adolescents: A multi‐wave longitudinal study
Pagliaccio, D., Bitran, A., Kirshenbaum, J. S., Alqueza, K. L., Durham, K., Chernick, L. S., Joyce, K. J., Lan, R., Porta, G., Brent, D. A., et al. (2023) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13868 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Hetrick, S. E., Gao, C. X., Filia, K. M., Menssink, J. M., Rickwood, D. J., Herrman, H., Hickie, I., McGorry, P., Telford, N., Parker, A. G., et al. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.053 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Schatten, H. T., Brick, L. A., Holman, C. S., & Czyz, E. (2021) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114174 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationProspective association of psychological pain and hopelessness with suicidal thoughts
Ballard, E. D., Farmer, C. A., Gerner, J., Bloomfield-Clagett, B., Park, L. T., & Zarate, C. A. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.033 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Rath, D., Teismann, T., Höller, I., Glaesmer, H., Paashaus, L., Schönfelder, A., Juckel, G., & Forkmann, T. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.23159 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Fortune, S., & Hetrick, S. (2022) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/00048674221107316 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Hutchinson, E., Scott, L. N., Choukas‐Bradley, S., & Silk, J. S. (2025) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579424001810 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
A Safety and Coping Planning Intervention for Suicidal Adolescents in Acute Psychiatric Care
O’Brien, K. H. M., Almeida, J., View, L., Schofield, M., Hall, W. J., Aguinaldo, L. D., Ryan, C. A., & Maneta, E. (2019) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2019.08.003 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Miller, A. B., Jenness, J. L., Elton, A., Pelletier‐Baldelli, A., Patel, K. K., Bonar, A. S., Martin, S., Dichter, G. S., Giletta, M., Slavich, G. M., et al. (2023) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.10.015 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Schulte-Frankenfeld, P. M., Breedvelt, J., Brouwer, M. E., van der Spek, N., Bosmans, G., & Bockting, C. (2024) · Clinical Psychology in Europe · doi:10.32872/cpe.13717 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Zietz, S., Iritani, B. J., Otieno, F. A., Ongili, B. O., Odongo, F. S., Rennie, S., & Luseno, W. K. (2020) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441692.2020.1782964 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Littlefield, A. K., Cooke, J. T., Bagge, C. L., Glenn, C. R., Kleiman, E. M., Jacobucci, R., Millner, A. J., & Steinley, D. (2021) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702620961067 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Kuehn, K. S., Foster, K. T., Czyz, E. K., & King, C. A. (2022) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12841 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationKivelä, L. M. M., Fried, E. I., van der Does, W. A. J., & Antypa, N. (2024) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329172400151x · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Fitzpatrick, S., Varma, S., & Ip, J. (2021) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2021.1932647 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Understanding Patterns of Adolescent Suicide Ideation: Implications for Risk Assessment
Miranda, R., Ortin‐Peralta, A., Rosario‐Williams, B., Kelly, T. F., Macrynikola, N., & Sullivan, S. R. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82465-5_9 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Suicidal Ideation in Iraqi Medical Students Based on Research Using PHQ-9 and SSI-C
Al-Imam, A., Motyka, M. A., Hoffmann, B., Basil, S., & Al-Hemiary, N. J. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20031795 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Miller, A. B., & Eisenlohr-Moul, T. A. (2019) · Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports · doi:10.1007/s40473-019-00185-2 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
The subcomponents of affect scale (SAS): validating a widely used affect scale
Jenkins, B. N., Cross, M. P., Donaldson, C. D., Pressman, S. D., Fortier, M. A., Kain, Z. N., Cohen, S., Martin, L. T., & Farkas, G. (2021) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2021.2000612 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Mandel, A. A., Revzina, O., Hunt, S., & Rogers, M. L. (2024) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2024.104602 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Smartphone-based text obtained via passive sensing as it relates to direct suicide risk assessment
Ammerman, B. A., Kleiman, E. M., O’Brien, C., Knorr, A. C., Bell, K., Ram, N., Robinson, T. N., Reeves, B., & Jacobucci, R. (2025) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291725001199 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Social anxiety and interpersonal risk for suicidal ideation: A longitudinal daily diary analysis
Brown, B. A., Rottenberg, J. A., & Goodman, F. R. (2023) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12996 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Shaygan, M., Negad, S. S., & Motazedian, S. (2021) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2021.1913636 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Van Wyk, J., & Gibson, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.925830 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Pediatric suicide: Review of a preventable tragedy
Greydanus, D. E., Nazeer, A., Qayyum, Z., Patel, D. R., Rausch, R., Hoang, L.-N., Miller, C., Chahin, S. S., Apple, R. W., Saha, G. K., et al. (2024) · Disease-a-Month · doi:10.1016/j.disamonth.2024.101725 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Gracini, C. L. D. O., Nascimento, G. G., Vidigal, M. T. C., de Oliveira, M. N., Herval, Á. M., Blumenberg, C., Vieira, W. D. A., Lima, R. R., & Paranhos, L. R. (2024) · Sao Paulo Medical Journal · doi:10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0641.r2.23012024 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Love, H. A., Morgan, P. C., & Smith, P. N. (2024) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.13125 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Ecological Momentary Assessment
Rabasco, A., & Andover, M. S. (2021) · Comprehensive Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818697-8.00189-8 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Spangenberg, L., Böhler, L., Hoke, T.-M., Serebriakova, J., Eimen, J., Forkmann, T., Strauß, M., Stengler, K., & Glaesmer, H. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251339265 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Clark, K. A., Phillips, K. F. V., Park, E., Argiros, A. P., Nikolaidis-Konstas, A., Sexton, J., Cyperski, M. A., Kleiman, E. M., & Pachankis, J. E. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0330204 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Crosby, E. S., Zuromski, K. L., & Witte, T. K. (2020) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.12716 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-rated risk as a predictor of suicide attempts among high-risk adolescents
Rockstroh, F., Reichl, C., Lerch, S., Fischer-Waldschmidt, G., Ghinea, D., Koenig, J., Resch, F., & Kaess, M. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.110 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
King, C. A., Harness, J. A., Arango, A., & Czyz, E. K. (2025) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-025-01620-w · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationBaryshnikov, I., Rosenström, T. H., & Isometsä, E. T. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.12.091 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Marraccini, M. E., Anonick, R., Delgaty, L. E., Middleton, T. J., Toole, E. N., Ying, J., & Hubal, R. C. (2024) · Psychological Services · doi:10.1037/ser0000874 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Operationalizing Engagement With an Interpretation Bias Smartphone App Intervention: Case Series
Ramadurai, R., Beckham, E. E., McHugh, R. K., Björgvinsson, Þ., & Beard, C. (2022) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/33545 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Nelson, B. W., Pollak, O. H., Clayton, M. G., Telzer, E. H., & Prinstein, M. J. (2023) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579423000251 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Sachs, R., Nakonezny, P. A., Balzen, K. M., Heerschap, J. K., Kennard, B. D., Emslie, G. J., & Stewart, S. M. (2024) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.13062 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Martin, B., Rasmussen, S. A., Russell, K., Crawford, M., Whittaker, S., Thomson, S., & Greenwood, A. (2026) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph23010084 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Ammerman, B. A., Knorr, A. C., McClure, K. E., O’Brien, C., & Xu, I. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.23747 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Blacutt, M. E., Jacobucci, R., & Ammerman, B. A. (2025) · Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science · doi:10.1037/abn0001048 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Oakey‐Frost, N., Harris, J. A., Roberge, E. M., Andres, W. C., Rugo, K. F., Bryan, A. O., & Bryan, C. J. (2020) · Archives of Suicide Research · doi:10.1080/13811118.2020.1848670 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Krall, H. R., Ruork, A. K., Rizvi, S. L., & Kleiman, E. M. (2024) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-024-10472-2 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
How do adolescents consider life and death? A cognition-to-action framework for suicide prevention
Benzekri, A., & Morris‐Perez, P. (2024) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579424001160 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Hendley, T., Gerner, J. L., Bolner, J., Moscardini, E. H., Tucker, R. P., & Hill, R. M. (2025) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-025-10214-y · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Weires, E., Edershile, E., Goel, D., Walsh, R. F. L., Burke, T. A., & Liu, R. T. (2025) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291725102547 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Pizzoli, S. F. M., Monzani, D., Conti, L., Ferraris, G., Grasso, R., & Pravettoni, G. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1103703 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Toukhy, N., Raviv, B., Haruvi-Catalan, L., Fennig, S., & Barzilay, S. (2024) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.13118 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Rabasco, A., Wallace, G. T., & Andover, M. S. (2024) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-024-10516-7 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide and Relationship Satisfaction: A Daily Diary Study
Love, H. A., & Morgan, P. C. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14121138 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
MacNeil, S., Renaud, J., & Gouin, J. (2024) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2024.43.5.492 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Grocott, L. R., Mair, A., Galione, J. N., Armey, M. F., Huang, J. J. S., & Nugent, N. R. (2022) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1002/jad.12060 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Zhu, J., Hou, X., Tao, H., Lin, K., Zhou, L., & Niu, L. (2025) · Asian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2025.104718 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Victor, S. E., Christensen, K., Johnson, S. L., Allen, J. V., & Brick, L. A. D. (2022) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/38582 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Predicting adolescents’ suicidal desire using Balanced Random Forest
Ishii, R. (2023) · The Japanese journal of psychology · doi:10.4992/jjpsy.94.22005 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Campos, S., Núñez, D. E., Pérez, J. C., & Robinson, J. (2024) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/57038 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Psychological Models of Suicide
Barzilay, S., & Lawrence, O. C. (2023) · doi:10.1093/med/9780197582718.003.0002 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Clifton, R. L., McCarty, C. A., Richardson, L. P., & Adrian, M. C. (2025) · Current Pediatrics Reports · doi:10.1007/s40124-025-00367-5 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Jang, Y., Chang, Y., Park, J., Jeon, S. W., Seo, B., Park, J. H., Kang, J., Kwon, R., Lim, G., Kim, K. H., et al. (2025) · Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences · doi:10.1017/s2045796025100334 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Bourke, M., Sippel, F., & Fortnum, K. (2026) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2026.04.033 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Henry, L. M., Pandya, U., Malone, E. P., Miller, C., Agyemang, S., Tandilashvili, E., Lewis, K., Haeffner, C. E., Lee, K., Livinski, A. A., et al. (2026) · NPP—Digital Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s44277-026-00058-z · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Czyz, E. K., Horwitz, A. G., Arango, A., & King, C. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Czyz, Ewa K.
- Venue
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-09-24
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 732-741
- ISSN
- 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7610
- PMC
- PMC6726492
- OpenAlex
- W2894519176
- Semantic Scholar
- aba196e596a3d9a097fc027553960d4b5f0e97ba
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 11.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
- Keywords
- suicidal ideation, adolescents, suicide attempts, psychiatric hospitalization, daily fluctuations, connectedness, perceived burdensomeness, hopelessness, risk prediction, post-discharge period, suicide prevention
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Female, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Male, Patient Discharge, Prognosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Suicide, Attempted, Time Factors, Suicidal Ideation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review