Cited by 3Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchTreatment of Major Depression

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk of dementia among antidepressant elderly users: A population-based cohort analysis in Spain

Open access
Santandreu, Javier, Caballero, Francisco Félix, Gómez-Serranillos, M. Pilar, González-Burgos, Elena·2024·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

The use of antidepressants with anticholinergic effects has been associated with an increased risk of dementia. However, the results published are contradictory. The aim of the study is to compare the risk of developing dementia in elderly who were prescribed tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) versus those who were prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and other antidepressants (OA). A prospective population-based cohort study was performed using the Spanish Database for Pharmacoepidemiological Research in Primary Care (BIFAP) data (from 2005 to 2018). The cohort study included 62,928 patients age ≥ 60 without dementia and with antidepressant long-term monotherapy. Patients were divided into exposure antidepressant groups based on ATC system [TCA, SSRIs users and OAs users]. The risk of dementia was calculated by Cox regression models, providing hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals. The Kaplan-Meier model was used for survival analysis. Chi2 test was used as association test. The results showed SSRI users had higher dementia risk than TCA users (HR = 1.864; 95%CI = 1.624-2.140). Moreover, OA users had also significant risk of dementia (HR = 2.103; 95%CI = 1.818-2.431). Several limitations are the variation of the trend in the prescription of antidepressants, the small number of patients that use some antidepressants, the lack of information related to the dose, or socioeconomic characteristics, the use of antidepressant drugs for other indications, or the therapeutic compliance. Our findings showed that older users of SSRI and OA have more risk of developing dementia than TCA elderly users. However, additional studies would be needed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.002

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Santandreu, J., Caballero, F. F., Gómez-Serranillos, M. P., & González-Burgos, E.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (ES)
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
349
Pages
54-61
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390649999
Cited by
3
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
dementia risk, antidepressants, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, anticholinergic effects, older adults, pharmacovigilance, primary care, pharmacoepidemiology
MeSH terms
Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic, Dementia, Humans, Prospective Studies, Spain, Cohort Studies, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review