The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Health-At-Every-Size and Eating Behaviors: 1-Year Follow-Up Results of a Size Acceptance Intervention
Abstract
Background Poor long-term success observed with current weight-control strategies stresses the relevance to explore new weight management approaches.Objective To assess the effects of a Health-At-Every-Size (HAES) intervention on eating behaviors, appetite sensations, metabolic and anthropometric variables, and physical activity levels in women at 6-month and 1-year postintervention.Design Randomized controlled trial; measurements at baseline, at the end of the intervention period (4 months), and at 6-month and 1-year postintervention (10 months and 16 months, respectively). Intervention and testing took place from September 2003 to August 2006.Participants/setting Premenopausal overweight/obese women (n=144; mean age of 42.3+/-5.6 years), recruited from free-living, general community.Intervention Women were randomly assigned to: HAES group (n=48), social support group (n=48), or control group (n=48).Main outcome measures Eating behaviors (restraint, disinhibition, and susceptibility to hunger), appetite ratings (desire to eat, hunger, fullness, and prospective food consumption), anthropometric and metabolic variables (body mass index, waist and hip circumferences, blood lipid levels, and blood pressure), and engagement in moderate to intense physical activity (energy cost > or =1.2 k cal x kg(-1) x 15 minutes(-1) [> or =4.8 metabolic equivalents]).Statistical analyses performed Changes for each dependent variable were assessed by linear mixed models according to a group (HAES vs social support vs control) by time (baseline vs 4 months vs 10 months vs 16 months) split-plot design.Results Situational susceptibility to disinhibition and susceptibility to hunger significantly decreased over time in both HAES group (-0.9+/-0.2 and -1.3+/-0.5, respectively) and the social support group (-0.4+/- 0.2 and -1.4+/-0.5, respectively). Although eating behavior scores observed at 16 months did not differ between HAES and social support groups (situational susceptibility to disinhibition: 2.5+/-0.2 in HAES group vs 2.7 +/- 0.2 in social support group; susceptibility to hunger: 4.2+/-0.5 in both groups), they were lower in these groups than scores noted in the control group (3.3+/-0.2 for situational susceptibility to disinhibition and 5.9+/-0.5 for susceptibility to hunger).Conclusions These results suggest that, when compared to a control group, an HAES approach could have long-term beneficial effects on eating behaviors related to disinhibition and hunger. In addition, our study did not show distinctive effects of the HAES approach in comparison to a social support intervention.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“adequate prevention of overeating also requires the presence of psychological strategies aimed to increase the awareness of satiation and satiety [117,118].”
From Homeostatic and Circadian Control of Food Intake: Clinical Strategies to Prevent Overconsumption (2013) · cites this paper as [117]
Citations
Cites
Friedewald, W. T., Levy, R. I., & Fredrickson, D. S. (1972) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/18.6.499 · Cited by 32,423
(1998) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e565682010-001 · Cited by 9,453
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger
Stunkard, A. J., & Messick, S. (1985) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8 · Cited by 4,687
Dieting and binging: A causal analysis.
Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (1985) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.40.2.193 · Cited by 1,539
Elfhag, K., & Rössner, S. (2005) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2005.00170.x · Cited by 1,343
Dieting and binging: A causal analysis.
Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (1985) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.40.2.193 · Cited by 1,279
Medicare's search for effective obesity treatments: Diets are not the answer.
Mann, T., Tomiyama, A. J., Westling, E., Lew, A.-M., Samuels, B., & Chatman, J. (2007) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.62.3.220 · Cited by 1,208
Lau, D. C. W., Douketis, J. D., Morrison, K. M., HRAMIAK, I. M., Sharma, A. M., & Ur, E. (2007) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.061409 · Cited by 1,195
A method to assess energy expenditure in children and adults.
Bouchard, C., Tremblay, A., Leblanc, C., Lortie, G., Savard, R., & Thériault, G. (1983) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/37.3.461 · Cited by 924
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Brownell, 1994, The dieting maelstrom, Am Psychol, 49, 781, 10.1037/0003-066X.49.9.781 · DOI
- Hill, 1986, The effects of a high-protein or high-carbohydrate meal on subjective motivation to eat and food preferences, Nut Behav, 3, 133
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Samdal, G. B., Eide, G. E., Barth, T., Williams, G., & Meland, E. (2017) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-017-0494-y · Cited by 788
Weight Science: Evaluating the Evidence for a Paradigm Shift
Bacon, L., & Aphramor, L. (2011) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2891-10-9 · Cited by 833
Weight stigma is stressful. A review of evidence for the Cyclic Obesity/Weight-Based Stigma model
Tomiyama, A. J. (2014) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2014.06.108 · Cited by 690
Review Article Relationships between intuitive eating and health indicators: literature review
Dyke, N. V., & Drinkwater, E. J. (2013) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980013002139 · Cited by 307
A Review of Interventions that Promote Eating by Internal Cues.
Schaefer, J. T., & Magnuson, A. B. (2014) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.024 · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Provencher, V., Bégin, C., Tremblay, A., Mongeau, L., Corneau, L., Dodin, S., Boivin, S., & Lemieux, S.
- Affiliations
- Université Laval (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Lemieux, Simone
- Venue
- Journal of the American Dietetic Association
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1854-1861
- ISSN
- 0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162499119
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (64226_1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- Health at Every Size, dietary habits, appetite, disinhibition, dietary restraint, social support, overweight women, obesity, weight management, physical activity, serum lipids, blood pressure, body mass index, waist and hip circumference, long-term follow-up, weight control strategies, body image, body dissatisfaction, body acceptance
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Appetite, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Image, Body Weight, Diet, Reducing, Feeding Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hunger, Obesity, Physical Fitness, Social Support, Health Behavior, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Linear Models, Treatment Outcome, Premenopause, Overweight
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
