Cited by 63Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Nutrition Labels Decrease Energy Intake in Adults Consuming Lunch in the Laboratory

Temple, Jennifer L., Johnson, Karena, Recupero, Kelly, Suders, Heather·2010·Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Abstract

Increased visibility of food labels is a potential method to reduce the rate of obesity. However, few empirical studies have investigated the impact of nutrition labeling on food selection or energy intake. This study tested the hypothesis that nutrition labeling in combination with nutrition label education would promote reductions in energy intake using a laboratory-based paradigm. Forty-seven male (n=24) and female (n=23) participants visited the Nutrition and Health Research Laboratory for a single lunch session during the months of May through August 2009. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two video groups (Nutrition Labeling Education or Organic Food Movement) and one of two labeling conditions (Nutrition Labels or No Labels). Participants watched a short educational video and then consumed a buffet lunch. Data were analyzed using a three-way analysis of covariance with sex, video condition, and labeling group as the between-subject factors and age and race as covariates. There were main effects of sex and nutrition label condition on lunch energy intake with females consuming less than males and people with nutrition labels consuming less energy than those without, regardless of sex or video condition. Examination of energy intake from low-energy-density and high-energy-density foods showed that the nutrition labeling group consumed less energy from both low-energy-density and high-energy-density food sources. These data support the use of nutrition labels as a way to reduce energy intake.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jada.2010.04.006

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Temple, J. L., Johnson, K., Recupero, K., & Suders, H.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Temple, Jennifer L.
Venue
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
110
Issue
7
Pages
1094-1097
ISSN
0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097061039
Cited by
63
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University at Buffalo
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
nutrition labeling, energy intake, food labeling, obesity prevention, food choice, energy density, sex differences, organic food movement
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Energy Intake, Eating, Female, Food Labeling, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Nutritional Sciences, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review