Cited by 149Treatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Titrated Subcutaneous Ketamine in Older Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression

George, Duncan, Gálvez, Verònica, Martin, Donel, Kumar, Divya, Leyden, John, Hadzi-Pavlovic, Dusan, Harper, Simon, Brodaty, Henry +4 more·2017·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous ketamine for geriatric treatment-resistant depression. Secondary aims were to examine if repeated treatments were safe and more effective in inducing or prolonging remission than a single treatment. Methods In this double-blind, controlled, multiple-crossover study with a 6-month follow-up (randomized controlled trial [RCT] phase), 16 participants (≥60 years) with treatment-resistant depression who relapsed after remission or did not remit in the RCT were administered an open-label phase. Up to five subcutaneous doses of ketamine (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 mg/kg) were administered in separate sessions (≥1 week apart), with one active control (midazolam) randomly inserted (RCT phase). Twelve ketamine treatments were given in the open-label phase. Mood, hemodynamic, and psychotomimetic outcomes were assessed by blinded raters. Remitters in each phase were followed for 6 months. Results Seven of 14 RCT-phase completers remitted with ketamine treatment. Five remitted at doses below 0.5 mg/kg. Doses ≥ 0.2 mg/kg were significantly more effective than midazolam. Ketamine was well tolerated. Repeated treatments resulted in higher likelihood of remission or longer time to relapse. Conclusion Results provide preliminary evidence for the efficacy and safety of ketamine in treating elderly depressed. Dose titration is recommended for optimizing antidepressant and safety outcomes on an individual basis. Subcutaneous injection i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.06.007

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
George, D., Gálvez, V., Martin, D., Kumar, D., Leyden, J., Hadzi-Pavlovic, D., Harper, S., Brodaty, H., Glue, P., Taylor, R., Mitchell, P. B., & Loo, C. K.
Affiliations
  • Black Dog Institute (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Royal North Shore Hospital (AU)
  • Wesley Hospital (AU)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Loo, Colleen K.
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
1199-1209
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2625860417
Cited by
149
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4
FWCI
6.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NSW Institute of Psychiatry
  • University of Barcelona
  • NARSAD
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
subcutaneous ketamine, treatment-resistant depression, geriatric depression, older adults, dose titration, remission, relapse, psychotomimetic effects, antidepressant efficacy, drug safety
MeSH terms
Aged, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Injections, Subcutaneous, Ketamine, Male, Midazolam, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Remission Induction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Cross-Over Studies, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review